Samilktray Posted 31 March 2008 Posted 31 March 2008 personally i wudnt want tyson he is to injury prone and why sell fryatt he has hit good form since playing right midfield and looks dangerous id say keep him that position. barry hayles must go if we are to sign a striker lets just sign 1 and let it be a top notch striker james beattie Barry Hayles must go yes, because its not like he puts in effort and tries to make things happen no. Fryatt has hit good form for a striker yes, how many goals ?
Brainy Posted 2 April 2008 Posted 2 April 2008 Apparently Tyson was taken off with an injury yesterday and may be a doubt for the play offs.
lildave3 Posted 2 April 2008 Posted 2 April 2008 personally i wudnt want tyson he is to injury prone and why sell fryatt he has hit good form since playing right midfield and looks dangerous id say keep him that position. barry hayles must go if we are to sign a striker lets just sign 1 and let it be a top notch striker james beattie About as dangerous looking as this:
Samilktray Posted 2 April 2008 Posted 2 April 2008 About as dangerous looking as this: Thats so cute.
Mort Posted 3 April 2008 Posted 3 April 2008 Hayles and Dj maybe, Not Fryatt and deffo not Hume. How could you sell Ian Hume. He is one of our best players, he has a increadible work rate, he's all over the pitch at times. Hume and Fryatt can stay. Fryatt is begining to show he can do somthing. ...like missing sitters from six yards out?, wait a second... thats what he's been showing for the best part of two years! And still his poor performances get excused, while other players get a hammering if they so much as put a foot wrong! Hayles will stay if Holloway is still here, too much money has been invested in DJ and frankly when fit (which hasnt been often) he's shown himself a good and consistent option up front (more than Fryatt ever has), Hume's been at a disadvantage through being played out of position but might be shifted after an indifferent season and Howard we'll hang onto so long as we're in this division coz, like it or not, he scores goals at this level and given a solid pre-season I think he's likley to do well next season.
Asha Posted 3 April 2008 Posted 3 April 2008 ...like missing sitters from six yards out?, wait a second... thats what he's been showing for the best part of two years! And still his poor performances get excused, while other players get a hammering if they so much as put a foot wrong! Hayles will stay if Holloway is still here, too much money has been invested in DJ and frankly when fit (which hasnt been often) he's shown himself a good and consistent option up front (more than Fryatt ever has), Hume's been at a disadvantage through being played out of position but might be shifted after an indifferent season and Howard we'll hang onto so long as we're in this division coz, like it or not, he scores goals at this level and given a solid pre-season I think he's likley to do well next season. That is true. Fryatt's a complete waste of space. Personally, I would take Tyson. But only if Fryatt goes. Tyson and Hammond up front would be decent partnership.
SamL Posted 3 April 2008 Posted 3 April 2008 About as dangerous looking as this: LilDave, that's bigger than you. That is true. Fryatt's a complete waste of space.Personally, I would take Tyson. But only if Fryatt goes. Tyson and Hammond up front would be decent partnership. (ankle) What you said about Fryatt is a bit harsh ain't it?
hackneyfox Posted 3 April 2008 Posted 3 April 2008 'Tyson and Hammond up front would be decent partnership. ' You are on a wind-up aren't you?
dandannieldanok Posted 3 April 2008 Author Posted 3 April 2008 Tyson and Hammond up front would be decent partnership. Good one, although you're a bit late for April fools.
Samilktray Posted 3 April 2008 Posted 3 April 2008 Good one, although you're a bit late for April fools. Could do better than Fryatt has done this season. Not hard though is it.
dandannieldanok Posted 3 April 2008 Author Posted 3 April 2008 Could do better than Fryatt has done this season.Not hard though is it. Tyson and Hammond would both be in the treatmen room all season. Tyson because he's crocked and Hammond because he's shite and the club are actually embarassed that he's our player. In fact, I'd rather have Fryatt as lone striker.
lildave3 Posted 3 April 2008 Posted 3 April 2008 LilDave, that's bigger than you. I know you don;t get the feeling from the picture, but it's actually 9 feet tall.
Ultra Posted 5 April 2008 Posted 5 April 2008 Tyson and Hammond would both be in the treatmen room all season. Tyson because he's crocked and Hammond because he's shite and the club are actually embarassed that he's our player. In fact, I'd rather have Fryatt as lone striker. No you wouldn't. It'd be a surefire guarantee that the team would never score. He's been so far off the pace lately, it's embarassing. Good job Hayles is available to replace him for the Colchester game.
BoneHead. Posted 5 April 2008 Posted 5 April 2008 Tyson and Hammond would both be in the treatmen room all season. Tyson because he's crocked and Hammond because he's shite and the club are actually embarassed that he's our player. In fact, I'd rather have Fryatt as lone striker. Is this your idea of a joke? can we have serious posts only from now on please
LCFC2007 Posted 8 April 2008 Posted 8 April 2008 I would rather see Kris Commons at Leicester rather than Nathan Tyson because we already have a lot of strikers but we haven't got many good midfielders at the moment.
dog_4 Posted 8 April 2008 Posted 8 April 2008 need more pace upfront, so tyson would make sence. also we need a left winger, so why not buy both. Also love to see isiah opsbourne and marton fulop sign for next season and possibly get hendrie and a left back and leave it at that.
Asha Posted 8 April 2008 Posted 8 April 2008 need more pace upfront, so tyson would make sence. also we need a left winger, so why not buy both. Also love to see isiah opsbourne and marton fulop sign for next season and possibly get hendrie and a left back and leave it at that. Who?
Fez of Mahrez Posted 8 April 2008 Posted 8 April 2008 I can't believe people are bothering with this. Have you seen the league table? Nutjobs.
Manwell Pablo Posted 9 April 2008 Posted 9 April 2008 I can't believe people are bothering with this. Have you seen the league table? Nutjobs. Will you just shut up and start naming players we have no chance of signing, get with the ****ing program FEZ!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.