A Look at the Managerial Candidates

[Foxes_Trust]

track records and comments here

http://foxestrust.co.uk/site/index.php?opt...83&Itemid=2

[C-man]

Just in case there is any good reason for this, the Trust would like to remind the club of Gregory’s performance at this last job at QPR, a 27.1% win ratio, and a not lost of 52.1%, which is worse than the LCFC record of the man who has just “departed by mutual consent” (28.1” win, 53.1% not lost).

I knew the Trust would say some something worthwhile at some point!

[Tevez]

I've just wasted 5 minutes of my life reading that.

[Fox You Forest]

I thought it was quiet good info for a change.

[Guest]

I actually thought it was quite interesting to see each prospective candidate's record side by side (or in this case in a kinda league table), so cheers for that FT.

(yes I know I probably could've done my own research to find that info but I am a lazy bastard )

[Legend_in_blue]

This is sound information which clearly substantiates the argument for bringing Ince into the club.

Still can't see it though.

[lavrentis]

Well I get Page Load Error when I click the link so I can't see it.

Edit - Fixed.

[Number 6]

surely the stats don't really count for much as these managers have been in different leagues, with different teams, in different situations.

[Guest]

surely the stats don't really count for much as these managers have been in different leagues, with different teams, in different situations.

Well yeah, but you're never gonna have them all in exactly the same situation so you could argue that the figures are misleading, but it's handy to have some stats to show their managerial record.

[lookwhaticando]

No Worthington.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh.

[Master Fox]

Eat sh*t c*nts

[Daggers]

track records and comments here

http://foxestrust.co.uk/site/index.php?opt...83&Itemid=2

Well done Bason - on the back of the huge influenced you have wielded over the season tickets it really makes sense for you to be now advising the club on their next manager.

[Fox in a Box]

who cares what the FTrust think..... go back to your comfy chairs and do something worthwhile.

Build a sandcastle for god sake....

Foxestrust quote

"As the term is used by geologists, sand particles range in diameter from 0.0625 (or 1⁄16 mm) to 2 millimeters. An individual particle in this range size is termed a sand grain. The next smaller size class in geology is silt: particles smaller than 0.0625 mm down to 0.004 mm in diameter. The next larger size class above sand is gravel, with particles ranging from 2 mm up to 64 mm (see particle size for standards in use). Sand feels gritty when rubbed between the fingers (silt, by comparison, feels like flour). Sand is commonly divided into five sub-categories based on size: very fine sand (1/16 - 1/8 mm diameter), fine sand (1/8 mm - 1/4 mm), medium sand (1/4 mm - 1/2 mm), coarse sand (1/2 mm - 1 mm), and very coarse sand (1 mm - 2 mm). These sizes are based on the Φ sediment size scale, where size in Φ = -log base 2 of size in mm. On this scale, for sand the value of Φ varies from -1 to +4, with the divisions between sub-categories at whole numbers"

We need a manager, and stats mean nothing

[Bryn]

Nothing particularly new in there but a fairly succinct (although I doubt I was the only one that skipped the life story from the Ram's trust guy) summary of the candidates, quite informative to read it all in one place and a well placed warning about Gregory.