CosbehFox Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 Correct, and Adams is more of a winger so practically down to the 2 we have playing. He played in the centre with Bury last season. I'd like to see him tbh. Also, there's gotta be a handy, young centre forward from one of the Big 4 who we could get in on loan. Finally, if Chambers wasn't injured...I firmly believe he'd have been given a chance up front.
Ultra Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 Doncaster are ready to loan out striker Darren Byfield, with MK Dons and Millwall keen. (News of the World)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darren_Byfield Would he be that bada signing if we could get him, maybe encourage Howard and Fryatt on a bit more? Not a bad call. Byfield would certainly give the strikeforce some mobility, which it badly needs.
Koke Posted 26 October 2008 Author Posted 26 October 2008 Fryatt and Dyer had been carrying us in the early parts of the season. Now, one can't score for shit and the other is off-form (but still contributes significantly to the team), so it's time for our centre mids amongst others to step up the plate and pull their weight. We can't keep relying on Dyer and Fryatt to get the goals for us.
lcfc81 Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 Must say in Kings defence he scored a disallowed goal yesterday. At least he is starting to look like he wants to get forward. On that point did anyone see why it was disallowed and if it was correct?
dandannieldanok Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 Must say in Kings defence he scored a disallowed goal yesterday. At least he is starting to look like he wants to get forward.On that point did anyone see why it was disallowed and if it was correct? Howard, who knocked it down to him was offside, it looked the right decision but can't be sure.
Ultra Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 TV evidence suggested Howard was marginally offside. The linesman took his time to put the flag up, though.
Daggers Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 Must say in Kings defence he scored a disallowed goal yesterday. At least he is starting to look like he wants to get forward. But his first-half shot would have looked dreadful on a non-league ground. It's not him, our efforts on goal have been looking poor from all over the park. We simply aren't troubling oppo keepers, and if we aren't asking them questions we are not commanding matches.
Thracian Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 I think Ric Flair mentioned a couple times that Adams scored most of his goals for Bury as a centre mid/attacking mid. There have been conflicting reports about whether Adams is any good in midfield. I've not been encouraged but of the situation generally, and including midfield, of course we need competition. At right-back, in central midfield and up front. Porter, Adams, Dickov and possibly McKay are the only real alternatives so some positions aren't sensibly covered at all, particularly right-back, defensive midfield and target striker. And most think we've no attacking midfield option either. Basically we're trying to win a battle when we're short of bullets.
Thracian Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 But his first-half shot would have looked dreadful on a non-league ground.It's not him, our efforts on goal have been looking poor from all over the park. We simply aren't troubling oppo keepers, and if we aren't asking them questions we are not commanding matches. He clearly tried to bend that shot with the outside of his foot. Had he caught it right it would have been an outstanding goal and he has done such things before from closer range. On this occasion it didn't work. Okay, it didn't nearly work. But at least the bloke took responsibility and had a go even if he did use the same sighting techniques as Howard and a few others yesterday afternoon!.
Sparky Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 He clearly tried to bend that shot with the outside of his foot. Had he caught it right it would have been an outstanding goal and he has done such things before from closer range.On this occasion it didn't work. Okay, it didn't nearly work. But at least the bloke took responsibility and had a go even if he did use the same sighting techniques as Howard and a few others yesterday afternoon!. haha brilliant statement , if he had caught it right it may well ended in row z . It was very poor technique for a proffesional football , in fairness he wasnt alone
lcfc81 Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 But his first-half shot would have looked dreadful on a non-league ground.It's not him, our efforts on goal have been looking poor from all over the park. We simply aren't troubling oppo keepers, and if we aren't asking them questions we are not commanding matches. Oh yeah I had forgot about that Maybe I was doing that survivor thing when they forget major traumas to cope!
Daggers Posted 26 October 2008 Posted 26 October 2008 He clearly tried to bend that shot with the outside of his foot. Had he caught it right it would have been an outstanding goal and he has done such things before from closer range.On this occasion it didn't work. Okay, it didn't nearly work. But at least the bloke took responsibility and had a go even if he did use the same sighting techniques as Howard and a few others yesterday afternoon!. :laugh: Come on! I could equal that courageous attempt at an outstanding goal too. Naked. Of course, I would probably have either gone for a more straightforward shot or laid the ball to someone else to do the same because that would have been the more sensible option. King chose to showboat and ended up looking more stupid than the phone callers to Radio Leicester: it was a crass decision, an appalling effort and wasted opportunity. And now we've done the "If it had gone in the net it'd been a goal!" line that just leaves the "He lost his head and kicked it over the bar!"
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.