Joe. Posted 18 December 2008 Posted 18 December 2008 Clubs Back 'Home-Grown' Ruling Good news all around. EDIT: Link fixed.
davieG Posted 18 December 2008 Posted 18 December 2008 Clubs Back 'Home-Grown' Ruling.Good news all around. The link doesn't work for me.
Webbo Posted 18 December 2008 Posted 18 December 2008 The link doesn't work for me. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7789808.stm
Fosse Boy Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 It doesn't go that far really, but it's certainlya step in the right direction. Good on them.
El_Thief Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 its a good idea but on sky sports they said that if it was in place last weekend all the clubs in the football league would already have been doing it, there some talk of it been a publicity stunt but all in all i think its a good idea, can't see the prem following suit though
Jay Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 to be honest I don't see what difference it makes the rule seems like a load of crap to me and is more politics than action!!! I know it's the football league and the premiership is different but If you are talking about Arsenal who some regard as the biggest culprits then the likes of Song, Clichy, Fabregas,Denilson, Vela and Bendtner would all pass this rule so what is the point?
lavrentis Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 Good news, hopefully the Prem will follow as I kind of want it to lower the Prem's standard with less foreigners but this should make it easier for promoted clubs to stay up and should improve the English players game and develop more talent.
davieG Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 Good news, hopefully the Prem will follow as I kind of want it to lower the Prem's standard with less foreigners but this should make it easier for promoted clubs to stay up and should improve the English players game and develop more talent. I suspect the only difference it will make is the big clubs will go out and entice young foreigners, with ££££££s to leave home and to join their academies, if that's the case then I think it's totally counter-productive.
Tilley Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 I suspect the only difference it will make is the big clubs will go out and entice young foreigners, with ££££££s to leave home and to join their academies, if that's the case then I think it's totally counter-productive. Exactly. Hence, thats why it is a load of crap.
Matt Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 I think this is quite good. Most of the smaller clubs I assume are not far away from this anyway. But there does need to be abit more protection of clubs, The big boys can't just come in and take your players and then you don't have enough of these home-grown players registered for atleast 3 years thus you not being able to play the game within the rules. In the Premiership, The foreign players do make it the best league in the world, but something needs doing to force teams into playing a minimum amount of English players, and thats one of the reasons I blame on the International side being poor. All i'm saying is Arsenal will be fooked if any minimum English players in a side rule comes in! The rule they propose reads to me that the player can be any nationality as long as they have been registered with the club for 3 years, not necessarily English.
Jay Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 I suspect the only difference it will make is the big clubs will go out and entice young foreigners, with ££££££s to leave home and to join their academies, if that's the case then I think it's totally counter-productive. but that already goes on look at Arsenal, Man Utd, Chelsea, Liverpool you take a look at their youth squads this is a political statement from the Football League to make it look like they are doing something when in reality it has no meaning or use in the practical sense.
davieG Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 but that already goes on look at Arsenal, Man Utd, Chelsea, Liverpool you take a look at their youth squadsthis is a political statement from the Football League to make it look like they are doing something when in reality it has no meaning or use in the practical sense. I know it goes on but this will increase it, I'm not disputing you're view of it.
davieG Posted 19 December 2008 Posted 19 December 2008 I think this is quite good. Most of the smaller clubs I assume are not far away from this anyway. But there does need to be abit more protection of clubs, The big boys can't just come in and take your players and then you don't have enough of these home-grown players registered for atleast 3 years thus you not being able to play the game within the rules.In the Premiership, The foreign players do make it the best league in the world, but something needs doing to force teams into playing a minimum amount of English players, and thats one of the reasons I blame on the International side being poor. All i'm saying is Arsenal will be fooked if any minimum English players in a side rule comes in! The rule they propose reads to me that the player can be any nationality as long as they have been registered with the club for 3 years, not necessarily English. This wont stop the big boys just coming in and taking your players, it doesn't specify they have to be registered with your academy just an English academy, they also don't specify the players must be English. Home-grown means just that but they can still be Brussel sprouts as well as English Pippins.
Joe. Posted 19 December 2008 Author Posted 19 December 2008 This will never happen in the Premiership unfortunately.
Jay Posted 20 December 2008 Posted 20 December 2008 This will never happen in the Premiership unfortunately. Why? it exists in the Champions league this season 8 homegrown players are required in each squad of 25, 4 from the clubs own academy and 4 from any English academy. they have to have been at the club or an English club from 16 so teams like Arsenal would still be fine and players like Fabregas would still probably class as a homegrown player always ways round things like this though
Edmund Posted 20 December 2008 Posted 20 December 2008 However, Grimsby Town boss Mike Newell was less enthused, telling 5 Live: "I take it with a pinch of salt. It won't have a massive impact in the lower divisions and I think it's probably another publicity stunt by the Football League." Got to love mike newell.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.