Corky Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 fook it if people have that much of problem it dm. Just go and watch then Jake
fox123 Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 fook it if people have that much of problem it dm. Stick your name down Jake, everyone else is
GLC Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 You mean you don't look like that? Big shame. sorry, so today people have found out im 18 and not a abi clancy!
fox123 Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 sorry,so today people have found out im 18 and not a abi clancy! Bang goes your lift, you can walk!
Bert Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 Legendary, we do need strikers ...Well both put your names down, it can't hurt. Ultimately it should really be non exclusive but its kinda down to Bert and the rest of the U21s. It's not just down to me. All I do is devise the final team. When we were at Cheds last week the majority of us (there was 7 or 8 of us there) decided on what the basis of the team would be and how many we'd have in our squad.
Bert Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 and the main dog didn't even get a phone call... Dunno why Wilkesy didn't answer....
Finnegan Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 I would encourage anyone to come along, really. Especially if they've been rucking on here. I really, really hope fox123 (for example) comes along and realizes that we're just a bunch of fairly normal people - and visa versa. For that reason I'd be really involving as far as DB11 and Shingler are concerned. HOWEVER I think there's a massive difference in maturity between the likes of Ultra, Thracian, TPH, fox123, Daggers etc and younger chaps on the forum. And that's not just the two young outcasts in question, but the Cheds, Joes, JMEs, Alberts and co of this world - too. And if you can't come and turn up without the chip-on-shoulder, without being willing to take the piss out of yourself a bit and acknowledge you've been a goober - then I wouldn't show up. If someone were to say to fox123 that they'd rather he didn't go (and I really hope this wouldn't be the case) I trust he'd be mature enough to at very least understand why. I think the mere fact, Jake, you don't quite "get" why people would be less keen to see you there and - more than that - play alongside you, sort of illustrates my point entirely. So look inside yourself. You want to turn up? Turn up. Just don't expect everyone to be involving if you're going to turn up in denial.
stez Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 It's not just down to me. All I do is devise the final team. When we were at Cheds last week the majority of us (there was 7 or 8 of us there) decided on what the basis of the team would be and how many we'd have in our squad. so you all sit around, discuss it and decide you were right? © brian clough
AoWW Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 SpectatorsLisa Sir Fynwy Katy & Singh Corky AoWW Looks like I'm going then!!!
Bert Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 so you all sit around, discuss it and decide you were right? © brian clough No. We decided what we thought might be best for the team.
GLC Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 I would encourage anyone to come along, really. Especially if they've been rucking on here. I really, really hope fox123 (for example) comes along and realizes that we're just a bunch of fairly normal people - and visa versa. For that reason I'd be really involving as far as DB11 and Shingler are concerned. HOWEVER I think there's a massive difference in maturity between the likes of Ultra, Thracian, TPH, fox123, Daggers etc and younger chaps on the forum. And that's not just the two young outcasts in question, but the Cheds, Joes, JMEs, Alberts and co of this world - too. And if you can't come and turn up without the chip-on-shoulder, without being willing to take the piss out of yourself a bit and acknowledge you've been a goober - then I wouldn't show up. If someone were to say to fox123 that they'd rather he didn't go (and I really hope this wouldn't be the case) I trust he'd be mature enough to at very least understand why. I think the mere fact, Jake, you don't quite "get" why people would be less keen to see you there and - more than that - play alongside you, sort of illustrates my point entirely. So look inside yourself. You want to turn up? Turn up. Just don't expect everyone to be involving if you're going to turn up in denial. who? jake obviously
Uncle Albert Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 No.We decided what we thought might be best for the team. I personally think it is better for the team.
stez Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 I would encourage anyone to come along, really. Especially if they've been rucking on here. I really, really hope fox123 (for example) comes along and realizes that we're just a bunch of fairly normal people - and visa versa. For that reason I'd be really involving as far as DB11 and Shingler are concerned. HOWEVER I think there's a massive difference in maturity between the likes of Ultra, Thracian, TPH, fox123, Daggers etc and younger chaps on the forum. And that's not just the two young outcasts in question, but the Cheds, Joes, JMEs, Alberts and co of this world - too. And if you can't come and turn up without the chip-on-shoulder, without being willing to take the piss out of yourself a bit and acknowledge you've been a goober - then I wouldn't show up. If someone were to say to fox123 that they'd rather he didn't go (and I really hope this wouldn't be the case) I trust he'd be mature enough to at very least understand why. I think the mere fact, Jake, you don't quite "get" why people would be less keen to see you there and - more than that - play alongside you, sort of illustrates my point entirely. So look inside yourself. You want to turn up? Turn up. Just don't expect everyone to be involving if you're going to turn up in denial. amen, brother. i've met many people off here, and found i was right to have reservations about them.
GLC Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 The would-be ref. oh fair enough i agree with you though, if people cant come without causing trouble then dont come
Uncle Albert Posted 8 January 2009 Posted 8 January 2009 The thing is when have any of the Under 21's (the less mature group) ever turned up to an FT match and caused trouble? Or started acting like a dick?
Finnegan Posted 9 January 2009 Posted 9 January 2009 It's not necessarily about causing trouble, it's about being humble. I'm well aware I get in people's faces on Foxes Talk - but I'm also well aware of my flaws, I know I'm not All That and I know I'm a mouthy, ignorant tit. I turn up with that humility and I get on with people. What we don't need are egos from "outsiders" who end up leaving unsure why they weren't embraced. It's never, EVER an easy thing penetrating a clique that already exists. Smutts in the first game he played with us was the classic example, shy, quiet, after all the hype he turned up and went off like a bit of a whimper. Come the St. Mags affair and he was the life of the party - it takes a bit of bottle and a bit of character, which is why I can see the Shinglers of this world struggling.
Uncle Albert Posted 9 January 2009 Posted 9 January 2009 It's not necessarily about causing trouble, it's about being humble.I'm well aware I get in people's faces on Foxes Talk - but I'm also well aware of my flaws, I know I'm not All That and I know I'm a mouthy, ignorant tit. I turn up with that humility and I get on with people. What we don't need are egos from "outsiders" who end up leaving unsure why they weren't embraced. It's never, EVER an easy thing penetrating a clique that already exists. Smutts in the first game he played with us was the classic example, shy, quiet, after all the hype he turned up and went off like a bit of a whimper. Come the St. Mags affair and he was the life of the party - it takes a bit of bottle and a bit of character, which is why I can see the Shinglers of this world struggling. Yea exactly the same from me I turned up at St. Mags for my first game and i'm pretty confident people would of thought I was a dick because of how I am on FT. But I got on with it and got involved with most of the people. This match has had a right dampner put on it just because we agreed on only having 15 players in our squad for the game and people who arent even in our age bracket are moaning.
GLC Posted 9 January 2009 Posted 9 January 2009 It's not necessarily about causing trouble, it's about being humble.I'm well aware I get in people's faces on Foxes Talk - but I'm also well aware of my flaws, I know I'm not All That and I know I'm a mouthy, ignorant tit. I turn up with that humility and I get on with people. What we don't need are egos from "outsiders" who end up leaving unsure why they weren't embraced. It's never, EVER an easy thing penetrating a clique that already exists. Smutts in the first game he played with us was the classic example, shy, quiet, after all the hype he turned up and went off like a bit of a whimper. Come the St. Mags affair and he was the life of the party - it takes a bit of bottle and a bit of character, which is why I can see the Shinglers of this world struggling. i should be fine then i can take just as much as i can give, in the ''real'' world
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.