ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Dr Sign oops, Signh? no singh. The one that kept saying MP
Guest Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 I never said he was an MP, and he is a member of Parliament, as you wrote via the EU Parliament. I think Dr Sign said MP.Don't be sorry, never watched Peep show, have i made a joke? Your post was the instigator of the misunderstanding. You are being very paranoid tonight. Alan Johnson has been posting for a few weeks - you should read some his posts.
Fosse Boy Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Would the BNP believe the police would defend them? Would the BNP think the police have more important things like trying to catch 1 million illegal immigrants? I often here people say, i was robbed but i didn't phone the police because they don't do anything anyway.If you recall, Mr Griffin was charged on "incitement to racial hatred" charges by the CPS and the Police's employers (Labour) in 2006?, 12 men and women of the public found him and Leicester lad Mark Collett not guilty, you can add the Liverpool 12, the dawn raid on a BNP MEP candidate june 3rd?, the police took money and phones etc to stop him in his election build up, no charges, no crime committed. The police stood by and let the Labour, Conservative etc sponsered thugs of UAF attack them june 9th? this year, so why would the BNP think the police would defend them? He's nothing for the city or county to be proud of, it actually makes me feel a little bit sick to know that I was born in the same city as an all out Nazi such as that cunt. You really are the third and fourth syllables of your username aren't you?
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Your post was the instigator of the misunderstanding. You are being very paranoid tonight.Alan Johnson has been posting for a few weeks - you should read some his posts. I could never be paranoid on FoxesTalk. Unless you're trying to stitch me up, you are aren't, you've got it in for me After that last dribble, blimey, i'd rather suck petrol.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 He's nothing for the city or county to be proud of, it actually makes me feel a little bit sick to know that I was born in the same city as an all out Nazi such as that cunt.You really are the third and fourth syllables of your username aren't you? What do you define as a Nazi, and equate that defined mission statement to Mark? And you know how to count When do the other adults play on this forum?
Flynny Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 We also, currently, have the largest number of people per square kilometer. than any other country in Europe. Not good, to put it mildly. That's not true, Holland beats us hands down.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Mark Collett exposed by Russell Brand.. the general unwashed public don't understand all the ins n outs of political tactic, i don't, but i know this, Mark didn't describe himself as a nazi in that documentary because he considers himself a nazi, he did it purely for publicity, and it worked fantasticly well, because it wasn't about engaging nazi wanabe's to the BNP, whoever those wanabe's are will have heard all about the BNP by now, what Mark did was engage people into finding out who the BNP are, thus, when they do, they realise the BNP have no nazi style policies, thus free promotion. Even showing this video in this thread is a promotion. Its a little bit like that Amy winehouse and that Docherty? the singer? in baby shambles, they aren't drugged up 24 hours a day, and they don't seek publicity 24/7, all that media stuff was to engage free publicity to sell their records. I saw baby shambles the other day, on stage and looking mighty clean cut, amazing progress.
BoneDog Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 the general unwashed public don't understand all the ins n outs of political tactic, i don't, but i know this, Mark didn't describe himself as a nazi in that documentary because he considers himself a nazi, he did it purely for publicity, and it worked fantasticly well, because it wasn't about engaging nazi wanabe's to the BNP, whoever those wanabe's are will have heard all about the BNP by now, what Mark did was engage people into finding out who the BNP are, thus, when they do, they realise the BNP have no nazi style policies, thus free promotion. Even showing this video in this thread is a promotion.Its a little bit like that Amy winehouse and that Docherty? the singer? in baby shambles, they aren't drugged up 24 hours a day, and they don't seek publicity 24/7, all that media stuff was to engage free publicity to sell their records. I saw baby shambles the other day, on stage and looking mighty clean cut, amazing progress. I watched that video just and Mark does sound like he is very clever and knows how to speak well. I never expected that for some reason. You're a Doherty fan? He plays alot of gigs for 'Music against Racism' you know, and I think he is a member of the UAF. Are you not a BNP voter after all? I thought you were but after saying you went to see Babyshambles I'm not so sure ! I thought all their fans were leftie types
C-man Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 I've heard so much blatant racism in the last two weeks or so that I'm quite embarrassed to be a part of the same society as such plebs.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 You're a Doherty fan? He plays alot of gigs for 'Music against Racism' you know, and I think he is a member of the UAF. Are you not a BNP voter after all? I thought you were but after saying you went to see Babyshambles I'm not so sure ! I thought all their fans were leftie types No, i don't like him. He doesn't know what racism is, not many do. Yes i think i seen his name on that UAF site too, explains what an idiot he is. I never said i went to see babyshambles, can't stand them. I would guess most of their fans live in a dream world, most of which would never wana live in a white monority society, like Leicester soon. Leicester 64% white in the 2001 census, be interesting to see the next one in 2011. Im guessing 52% white. Heres a question, lets say Leicester is 40% (probably more) brown/black, why isn't our fan base something similar? Why havn't we got 8,000 brown/black supporters?
Edmund Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Heres a question, lets say Leicester is 40% (probably more) brown/black, why isn't our fan base something similar? Why havn't we got 8,000 brown/black supporters?
C-man Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 No, i don't like him. He doesn't know what racism is, not many do. Yes i think i seen his name on that UAF site too, explains what an idiot he is. I never said i went to see babyshambles, can't stand them. I would guess most of their fans live in a dream world, most of which would never wana live in a white monority society, like Leicester soon. Leicester 64% white in the 2001 census, be interesting to see the next one in 2011. Im guessing 52% white.Heres a question, lets say Leicester is 40% (probably more) brown/black, why isn't our fan base something similar? Why havn't we got 8,000 brown/black supporters? Well, a lot of Asians don't like football for a start. Secondly, they might be first/second generation immigrants that don't yet feel like they belong to Leicester, or thirdly they subscribe to SkySports Big Four bullshit.
Flynny Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Well, a lot of Asians don't like football for a start. Secondly, they might be first/second generation immigrants that don't yet feel like they belong to Leicester, or thirdly they subscribe to SkySports Big Four bullshit. Or fourthly they're put off by the still not inconsiderable racism in the stands.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Or fourthly they're put off by the still not inconsiderable racism in the stands. At Filbert street, there was quite alot of what people consider to be racism, but in the 6 years at the plastic ground, ive only seen one incident.
Flynny Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 At Filbert street, there was quite alot of what people consider to be racism, but in the 6 years at the plastic ground, ive only seen one incident. I know a couple of people have been called Pakis and the like, can't say they enjoyed the experience or felt much like going back. You're right, there's far less of it about but the reputation that football fans carry is enough to keep a lot away, whatever the actual realities of the situation.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 I know a couple of people have been called Pakis and the like, can't say they enjoyed the experience or felt much like going back. You're right, there's far less of it about but the reputation that football fans carry is enough to keep a lot away, whatever the actual realities of the situation. In my 16 years of going down the City, i have never seen any kind of racism. I'm not sticking up for it but i think our fans are well behaved on the racism thing. Also i took my mate, who's a indian to his first ever came of soccer. Was at highfield road against Cov and he sat up the top with the lads and he enjoyed it and now is a Leicester fan.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 In my 16 years of going down the City, i have never seen any kind of racism. I'm not sticking up for it but i think our fans are well behaved on the racism thing.Also i took my mate, who's a indian to his first ever came of soccer. Was at highfield road against Cov and he sat up the top with the lads and he enjoyed it and now is a Leicester fan. How about getting him to put a good word in at his mosque? Theres thousands of potential support out there that could be the difference between us getting Joe Bloggs or Ched Evans to play for us.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 How about getting him to put a good word in at his mosque? Theres thousands of potential support out there that could be the difference between us getting Joe Bloggs or Ched Evans to play for us. He's not a muslim, even if he was, why would that matter ?
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 He's not a muslim, even if he was, why would that matter ? Even better that he's not a muslim, as most of Leicester's asians are sikh's and hindu's. Tell him to wear a city shirt around belgrave etc.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 That's not true, Holland beats us hands down. WRONG! Check it out. They are currently second behind us. The latest figures are from March of this year.
Flynny Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 WRONG! Check it out. They are currently second behind us. The latest figures are from March of this year. Does it say England or Britain? If it's Britain I'm really surprised, I thought the gulf was quite large. In fact looking again unless the population of Holland has fallen by about 4 million that can't be right.
Budweiser Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 According to admin, this isn't anywhere near abuse no worries, i'll pass your email address onto the mental health board and add that ive found you "The tough part with the muslim religion is that so far they are the only ones killing people(even their own!!) "in the name of god". I know christianity (read catholisism) did it, but they found out it was wrong and stopped. Muslim society claims that they are a religion of peace, but if you do not think just like they do, you are considered an enemy. I am not being radical, that is how they behave. I live in an international community and that is why the muslims are only among them, because of course in many things(not just religion) there are different ways of thinking, so for them, if you think different then you are not in the group... of course we(non muslims) are not part of their group, but even sharing time becomes a bug for them... " - this wasn't me, just quoting someone. Religion is just hassle, whichever way you look at it, basically. That's my opinion.
BoneDog Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 "The tough part with the muslim religion is that so far they are the only ones killing people(even their own!!) "in the name of god". I know christianity (read catholisism) did it, but they found out it was wrong and stopped. Muslim society claims that they are a religion of peace, but if you do not think just like they do, you are considered an enemy. I am not being radical, that is how they behave. I live in an international community and that is why the muslims are only among them, because of course in many things(not just religion) there are different ways of thinking, so for them, if you think different then you are not in the group... of course we(non muslims) are not part of their group, but even sharing time becomes a bug for them... " - this wasn't me, just quoting someone. Religion is just hassle, whichever way you look at it, basically. That's my opinion. Whoever you're quoting doesn't really know what they talking about. Most Muslims accept all ways of life. As for killing, if we look at statistics we find that Muslims are by far in the majority of people being slaughtered around the world. Chechnya, Iraq, Palestine, Indonesia, Afghanistan and many more countries. I'm not talking about the men with guns who get killed by soldiers, I'm talking about innocent people. Muslims are getting shat on all over the place. Yes some Muslims fight soldiers in these country, but they are in a minority.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 Bud, religion, or atleast the godly form, is a nightmare, the worst thing to inflict humanity IMO. Given credence by very powerfull people such as the people who re-ignited the Knights Templars of the 13th century. The KT's used to be christians, but fell out of love with that religion and sought alternative satanic practises and homosexuality. An example of who's taken on their ways is illustrated by the statue on Capitol Hill, a lady of the 14th? century called Persephone, the Queen of the underworld. Now why would the Queen of the underworld be looking down from a political building on the people of America? Meaning, today's religion has been bartasized for brainwashing purposes, Islam, Christianity etc, all infiltrated via the Vatican, who's gold reserves live in the Bank Of England, controlled by Evelyn Rothschild, the second richest human on earth, or atleast the House of Rothschild is, behind the Queen/Royalty (including the Danish (mark of dan) and the dutch). There are good muslims, there are bad muslims, and theres evil muslims who work alongside the worlds most powerful people for war purposes, all in the name of religion. Every major war over the last 300 years was orchestrated via the money men. An example of the power the money men in society have, is illustrated via Baron Nathan Mayer Rothschild, one of 5 famous sons of Amschel Mayer Rothschild who set out to conquer the world in the late 18th century, he said after helping Welligton defeat Napoleon and cleaning up on the English stock market via that win, "I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England. The man that controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire - and I control the British money supply."
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.