Thracian Posted 13 June 2009 Posted 13 June 2009 you could indeed argue that but a deafer set of ears you could never wish to meet. Do I hear the pot calling the kettle? Cos I certainly don't hear too many complaining about China bleeding Africa of its resources today and we've been invaded and subjected by all and sundry over the centuries. Mind you most countries in times past had to win military victories - paid for in effort and lives - to exploit resources. We just donate them now in welfare - at least the product of those dwindling resources - if only to satisfy the guilt complex we're told we supposed to have for the past, nonsense that it is. Ironic now that the white natives are finding they've got to battle to survive and yet the social engineering do-gooders cry foul because we once battled and competed for spoils as a matter of course, right across the world and on every ocean. Predictable hypocrisy that. Nowadays we don't even have the navy to defend our island or even put the wind up a few Somali pirates in inflatables. Might offend someone I suppose. Yes, I know. Browny's spent the money and would spend a lot more given chance. But I'm sure a bit of the money wasted on welfare, quangos nd MPs expenses would fund the building of some decent ships in once busy shipyards and re-activate an underused workforce. If nothing else cruise liners are very much the in thing and owners like to base them here. If only we could teach enough immigrants to build ships to the highest standard for low rates of pay while at the same time persuading British shipyard workers to forget they are fully skilled and time-served and to sod off somewhere else instead. That would make us competitive.
Hullfox Posted 13 June 2009 Posted 13 June 2009 Do I hear the pot calling the kettle? Not if you're deaf, no.
Thracian Posted 13 June 2009 Posted 13 June 2009 It's not really the government's fault that England has no culture of it's own to celebrate. I'd expect that of a Welshman. But to broaden your education... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_culture
Thracian Posted 13 June 2009 Posted 13 June 2009 Because I felt compelled to. I am sick and tired of the way this Government ( National and local ) and country are slowing trying to draw every ounce of my birthright to be English and proud out of me.You may all mock Thracian, but he doesn't just hit the nail on the head, he shatters it when he says this Government is Racist.They are Racist to the very pit of their stomachs. Why is it that, in a nation supposedly trying to achieve a race-ethnicity "color blind" society in which each individual is dealt with equally, on the basis of his merit, etc. certain races and ethnicities are openly encouraged to "celebrate" their "diversity" - and more, to identify in explicitly racial/ethnic terms - while just one group - whites - is forbidden this and,moreover, heavily lectured that any action or thought that even remotely hints at a white racial identity amounts to racism?. WTF???? People in this country can't see the woods for the trees, in particular the youth. ( As so many on here have proved ) I'm feeling guilty now - bringing the combined weight of the Swan Lestas down on you! I should have warned you earlier. They're a bit like a rugby scrum. Once the signals given they do pack tight together. Quite reminds me of the old days.
Thracian Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 IS Thracian's latest rant final proof that he has fallen for the BNP's propaganda? Or is he really a 'closet' supporter? The BNP is trying to remodel itself as not being racist, but standing up for the rights of working class whites. They argue that racism does exist, but it's the whites who are victims of the 'politically correct' race relations lobby and self-denigrating whites who put foreigners and asylum-seekers first. In fact, Thracian uses the same language as the BNP! Thracian does not attack racism or seek to find the issues really affecting blacks, Asians, whites, asylum-seekers and migrants alike. That's the same thing the BNP does, now that it is not a 'racist' party. In other words, racism is caused by 'anti racism' and the only way to deal with it is to ignore it or only speak about white victims. If you consider that "proof" of anything I just hope you're not a judge! I don't actually know whether I'm more concerned that you think me a BNP supporter or, if I was, that I'd stay in the "closet" and not have the courage to say so. Even worse you even imply that I'm a liar seeing as I've actually said on here that I didn't vote for anyone in the recent elections because none of the options represented my views. While I'm equally pissed of with a) white people being disadvantaged and displaced and b) English politicians sitting back and doing nothing about it and while I still believe it to be worth arguing for a genuinely fair and inclusive society where racism against and the victimisation of native whites is as readily condemned as racism against others, because I have long considered and treated all races with respect. even those I believe are intent are changing the nature of this land for ever. Unfortunately people will inevitably choose to interpret my calls for an end to all discrimination and for responsible policies in relation to this country, its future and its economic viability as an attack on immigrants when in fact it is an attack on politicians who have failed the population of this country (including established immigrants) and supporters of the politicians' policies which have allowed them to go ahead with the resulting mess, well diuscussed, that we now find ourselves in.
Dr The Singh Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 It was white males who fashioned a country in the first place that all and sundry now want to live in. Like many who are successful they've felt a desire to share it. Some have accepted the invitation with good grace and goodwill, and have gone on to make themselves a happy life in Britain. Others have taken advantage, have thrown our charity in our faces and have sought to undermine our society for their own advantage and purposes. The fact is, that the nation throughout it's history was invaded and remodelled!!!
Guest Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 I love how this campaign for St George's day has become a banner for some; no fecker ever celebrated it in the past.
Fosse Boy Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 I love how this campaign for St George's day has become a banner for some; no fecker ever celebrated it in the past. I think it's brilliant. Every year all the English should gather together on the 23rd of April to celebrate their Englishness and everything that's great about their country by, er, having a go at anyone who isn't English and chanting loyalist slogans.
Dr The Singh Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 quote name='Thracian' date='Jun 14 2009, 12:17 AM' post='1404703'] Do I hear the pot calling the kettle? Cos I certainly don't hear too many complaining about China bleeding Africa of its resources today and we've been invaded and subjected by all and sundry over the centuries. Mind you most countries in times past had to win military victories - paid for in effort and lives - to exploit resources. We just donate them now in welfare - at least the product of those dwindling resources - if only to satisfy the guilt complex we're told we supposed to have for the past, nonsense that it is. Ironic now that the white natives are finding they've got to battle to survive and yet the social engineering do-gooders cry foul because we once battled and competed for spoils as a matter of course, right across the world and on every ocean. Predictable hypocrisy that. Nowadays we don't even have the navy to defend our island or even put the wind up a few Somali pirates in inflatables. Might offend someone I suppose. Yes, I know. Browny's spent the money and would spend a lot more given chance. But I'm sure a bit of the money wasted on welfare, quangos nd MPs expenses would fund the building of some decent ships in once busy shipyards and re-activate an underused workforce. If nothing else cruise liners are very much the in thing and owners like to b ase them here. If only we could teach enough immigrants to build ships to the highest standard for low rates of pay while at the same time persuading British shipyard workers to forget they are fully skilled and time-served and to sod off somewhere else instead. That would make us competitive. Funny you should say that, I was reading a article the other day that white brits were bottom of the pile in there gcse exams, infact chinese, africans and indians were well ahead, so who is gonna be teaching whom. Also I wouldn't worry, manufacturing is dead in this nation, the chinese, and other asiatic nations will be care of it!! It's not ironic that white natives are struggling, we all fooking are!! You forget, the pillaging the british empire did, not to add the hoards of colonial soldiers the british empire used. My forefathers faught and died for the brits in both world wars, infact my grandad faught in burma, my mothers brother was stationed in africa. It would be highly inproper for those that faught for this nation to be forgotten.
Finnegan Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Actually you could argue that it was exploitation of the resources of the nations of the British empire which built and sustained Britain as the power it was and created the foundations of the nation we are today. Translation: Britain was built on slavery. I'd expect that of a Welshman. But to broaden your education... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_culture You're still only the fourth most interesting nation in the UK.
Daggers Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 I'd expect that of a Welshman. But to broaden your education... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_culture Fuck me - so all of that is now banned by the racist government? Even Cheddar cheese? Bastards. I'm feeling guilty now - bringing the combined weight of the Swan Lestas down on you! I should have warned you earlier. They're a bit like a rugby scrum. Once the signals given they do pack tight together. Quite reminds me of the old days. Actually Tony, your posting over the last four weeks has reminded me of that too - because it is insufferable bollocks. You are being a bit of a twat.
Daggers Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Kelly Holmes is not fully British, says BNP MEP Andrew Brons These racist types really know how to make themselves look total cunts, don't they! Stormfront's response is predictably hilarious.
Koke Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Since Thracian and the BNP as well is extremely worried about the "Islamification" of Britain, then they can surely have no objection to a black person joining the party since the are evidently not Muslims cos they seem to attend Churches every week. After all, there are many black people in the UK whose attendance at church shows that they are not nor ever will be a danger to the Christian traditions, religion, culture and law in this country. So like a good politician, Thracian has dodged the question very well all through the 32 pages and instead has harped on and on about Muslims & Asians like a broken record - so I ask again, why can't a black Christian lad like Emile Heskey join the BNP since they are worried about "Islamification" being their number one problem, allegedly? Surely that will help their cause vs Islam, no?
Edmund Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Fuck me - so all of that is now banned by the racist government?Even Cheddar cheese? Bastards. Officer : Whats that in the boot of the car? British Citizen : Its Edam, honest. Officer : Release the Mice unit. Officer : Yep it's come up trumps. Cheedar. Officer : Im arresting you for possession and intent to supply a class A cheese. You have the right to remain silent ....
stez Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Officer : Whats that in the boot of the car?British Citizen : Its Edam, honest. Officer : Release the Mice unit. Officer : Yep it's come up trumps. Cheedar. Officer : Im arresting you for possession and intent to supply a class A cheese. You have the right to remain silent .... pc : sir...... officer : what? pc : i've found a stash of shakespeare, dickens, several rings of cumberland sausages british subject : you've planted them on me! officer : you people disgust me.
Finnegan Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Seven sticks of dynamite, four glass bottles, three hundred nails and a copy of the Qu'ran? Well, no, I didn't see that episode of Blue Peter... I suppose you're alri-... what's that? A brightly ribboned hat, ankle-strap bells and a wooden stick? Sir, I'm going to have to ask you to come with me...
Edmund Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 pc : sir......officer : what? pc : i've found a stash of shakespeare, dickens, several rings of cumberland sausages british subject : you've planted them on me! officer : you people disgust me. Brief : We have had reports of an underground fish and chip network in the city. These guys are to be considered dangerous and will not hesitate to use there deep fat fryers. Be vigilant as they like to throw batter in the eyes. We believe the doors are rigged with sausages. These traditional scum will batter a mars bars if give the opportunity so use all force possible. We have been seeing a daily pattern. The users will approach just before dinner time and leave with a bag full of goods wrapped in newspapers. (The officers in the room mutter : Bastards) Since labour outlawed fish and chips we have had an increase of fishheads and chipheads mugging in order to get there daily fix. Last of all I want all fridges checked as word on the street is that the chips are being garnished with cheddar cheese.
Zingari Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 Who voted BNP and why? http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/poli...and+why/3200557 i found it a good read anyway , and does seem to imply that BNP voters were merely expressing a lot of what Thracian has been saying ( rightly or wrongly ) edit; this bit in particular from the article . We also find that most BNP voters do NOT subscribe to what might be described as "normal racist views". Just 44 per cent agreed with the party in rejecting the view that non-white citizens are just as British as white citizens. Yet the feeling is widespread that white Britons get a raw deal. Seventy seven per cent of BNP voters think white people suffer unfair discrimination these days. But that is also the views of 40 per cent of the public as a whole.
Thracian Posted 14 June 2009 Posted 14 June 2009 quote name='Thracian' date='Jun 14 2009, 12:17 AM' post='1404703']If only we could teach enough immigrants to build ships to the highest standard for low rates of pay while at the same time persuading British shipyard workers to forget they are fully skilled and time-served and to sod off somewhere else instead. That would make us competitive. Funny you should say that, I was reading a article the other day that white brits were bottom of the pile in there gcse exams, infact chinese, africans and indians were well ahead, so who is gonna be teaching whom. Also I wouldn't worry, manufacturing is dead in this nation, the chinese, and other asiatic nations will be care of it!! I've read similar myself and have mentioned the need for our natives to compete and learn. Whether poor perfomance is down to lack of motivation, widespread family beakdown (Chinese and Indians strike me as having strong family values though I may be mistaken) or other factors I don't know. But in the days of Grammar Schools education seemed to be high on many English people's agenda). You forget, the pillaging the british empire did, not to add the hoards of colonial soldiers the british empire used. My forefathers faught and died for the brits in both world wars, infact my grandad faught in burma, my mothers brother was stationed in africa. It would be highly inproper for those that faught for this nation to be forgotten. I don't and wouldn't ever forget about those who fought for England. Indeed I think it embarrassing the way the Gurkhas have been treated regarding nationality. Yet I'm beginning to lose count of the number of long-established Indians here, doubtless the kind you mention, who seem as keen as me to slow the flow of immigration to Britain while the jobs situation is so bad. Perhaps they are people in isolation few who have given me the wrong overall impression. There is, however, no doubting the change and the strength of native English opinion or the determination of Labour and their "open door" supporters to ignore it.
Zingari Posted 24 June 2009 Posted 24 June 2009 I fail to see why there is so much fuss about the BNP yours sincerely I. Littler
Ultra Posted 24 June 2009 Posted 24 June 2009 They certainly worry the Tories. And so they should. The BNP have shown in Leicestershire they can attract support in Tory areas as well as Labour ones.
Ultra Posted 24 June 2009 Posted 24 June 2009 From the Norwich Evening News The controversial British National Party has confirmed that one of its members will bid to become the next Norwich North MP.Robert West, founder of the Christian Council of Britain and who describes himself as a “reverend” on the BNP website, will officially stand to replace Ian Gibson. He was the lead candidate for the BNP, which has been condemned for its extreme views, in the East Midlands but did not gain enough votes to win a seat in the European Parliament last month. Today, MPs and councillors hit out at the party and said their extremism was not welcome. North Norfolk MP Norman Lamb said: “I want voters to reject extremism and if anyone stands for the BNP they should be rejected. They are a racist party and are preying on vulnerable people. “I believe in treating people equally and this party does not share this view.” Tim East, a South Norfolk councillor for Costessey, said: “Before anyone has a chance of being elected we need to know their full background. There should be complete transparency into people's pasts before the public can make a valued judgement.” Mr West caused controversy on BBC1 in February when he said the answer to the recession was for women to “work at home” and he is against all forms of multi-culturalism. And the 53-year-old, who lives near Spalding in south Lincolnshire, said today: “We are taking a strong anti-immigration line. And we are against the issue of sovereignty to the European community. I believe multi-culturalism is unnecessary and evil. “I want the people of Norwich to follow this line and realise we have not been tough enough on immigration. I do not want anywhere in this country turning into the Middle East. “This is Britain and I will fight to keep it that way.” Mr West said although he does not live in the city he believes he can represent people here because he comes from a “rural community” which is similar to Norfolk and he has lectured for the University of East Anglia (UEA). He admitted to possessing old fashioned views but said he wants to tell people in Norwich the truth about what he represents and “not a pack of lies”. He said he believes the market has been flooded with women working and it would be “better if they stayed at home”. “The domestic sphere is a natural place for a woman to be,” he said. “I honestly think it is woman's right to be at home. Women should get married and their first priority should be the home. “Recently the home has been abandoned and this modern way does not work. I think many women agree with this, even though they are working themselves. “This is my view and I hope to get the people of Norwich to listen to this.” I'm sure they will - and then tell the "reverend" to hasten back to his cave as soon as possible.
Webbo Posted 24 June 2009 Posted 24 June 2009 From the Norwich Evening NewsRobert West, founder of the Christian Council of Britain and who describes himself as a “reverend” on the BNP website, will officially stand to replace Ian Gibson. According to some he's the only member of the Christian Council of Britain and he's not a real reverend.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.