Hullfox Posted 24 June 2009 Posted 24 June 2009 The domestic sphere is a natural place for a woman to be,” he said. “I honestly think it is woman's right to be at home. Women should get married and their first priority should be the home. Works in our house.
Ultra Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 BNP babes website I'm sure this will give some posters a thrill or two..
Koke Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 I would nail couple of them, whatever their belief. I think it's just people taking the mick, really. I don't think these legitimate views.
lou Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 BNP babes websiteI'm sure this will give some posters a thrill or two.. their comments are HILARIOUS!!!
lou Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 I would nail couple of them, whatever their belief. I think it's just people taking the mick, really. I don't think these legitimate views. Oh I dunno...... sounds very much like some of the stuff the BNP supporters have posted on here recently
Guest Bilo Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 their comments are HILARIOUS!!! Such as...... Think of Nazi Germany, or 1930s Italy.I can’t even remember when that happened really, but I’m against them anyway. How old are you?19. Wait, no, 18. 19 next month. When you don't even know how old you are, who you intend to vote for is irrelevant. You're probably too fucking stupid to find the Polling Station.
coale39 Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 Some of them are. I kind of got into it through my friend Danny. He’s really racist. Everyone calls him “Nazi Danny”. He started telling me about them, and it made a lot of sense. Just...amazingly, hilariously worrying.
Guest Bilo Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 Just...amazingly, hilariously worrying. I wouldn't mind flipping one or two of them over and giving them the good news. Wouldn't go any further than that, I'd end up going all Peter Harvey on their arse.
Daggers Posted 15 July 2009 Posted 15 July 2009 BNP babes website Think of Nazi Germany, or 1930s Italy.I can’t even remember when that happened really
Zingari Posted 16 July 2009 Posted 16 July 2009 I fail to see why there is so much fuss about the BNP yours sincerely I. Littler I agree regards C. Guile
Guest Posted 16 July 2009 Posted 16 July 2009 Are most of your friends BNP?Some of them are. I kind of got into it through my friend Danny. He’s really racist. Everyone calls him “Nazi Danny”. He started telling me about them, and it made a lot of sense. Brilliant!!
lou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/glouces...ire/8162309.stm Here we go again!!
James. Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/glouces...ire/8162309.stmHere we go again!! The only mistake that chap made was using beer instead of piss.
lou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 The only mistake that chap made was using beer instead of piss. It was Guiness though to be fair!
Tabou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 It was Guiness though to be fair! MP for Ribble Valley, Nigel Evans comemnted "What a terrible waste of beer". Never a truer word said. I would love to have the opportunity for an altercation with Nick Griffin. The tosser looks like he fell out of the ugly tree, and was subsequently dragged through the forest.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/glouces...ire/8162309.stmHere we go again!! Why is a hooligan allowed to attack an elected member of Parliament and get away with it, and, why has a member of our government supported the thug, and, why has the "neutral" BBC written the story in favour of the government member, thus the thug.
lou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Why is a hooligan allowed to attack an elected member of Parliament and get away with it, and, why has a member of our government supported the thug, and, why has the "neutral" BBC written the story in favour of the government member, thus the thug. Because no one reported it to the Police! Wonder why that was?
Tabou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Why is a hooligan allowed to attack an elected member of Parliament and get away with it, and, why has a member of our government supported the thug, and, why has the "neutral" BBC written the story in favour of the government member, thus the thug. Because Nick Griffin is a twat.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Because no one reported it to the Police! Wonder why that was? Would the BNP believe the police would defend them? Would the BNP think the police have more important things like trying to catch 1 million illegal immigrants? I often here people say, i was robbed but i didn't phone the police because they don't do anything anyway. If you recall, Mr Griffin was charged on "incitement to racial hatred" charges by the CPS and the Police's employers (Labour) in 2006?, 12 men and women of the public found him and Leicester lad Mark Collett not guilty, you can add the Liverpool 12, the dawn raid on a BNP MEP candidate june 3rd?, the police took money and phones etc to stop him in his election build up, no charges, no crime committed. The police stood by and let the Labour, Conservative etc sponsered thugs of UAF attack them june 9th? this year, so why would the BNP think the police would defend them?
James. Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Would the BNP believe the police would defend them? Would the BNP think the police have more important things like trying to catch 1 million illegal immigrants? I often here people say, i was robbed but i didn't phone the police because they don't do anything anyway.If you recall, Mr Griffin was charged on "incitement to racial hatred" charges by the CPS and the Police's employers (Labour) in 2006?, 12 men and women of the public found him and Leicester lad Mark Collett not guilty, you can add the Liverpool 12, the dawn raid on a BNP MEP candidate june 3rd?, the police took money and phones etc to stop him in his election build up, no charges, no crime committed. The police stood by and let the Labour, Conservative etc sponsered thugs of UAF attack them june 9th? this year, so why would the BNP think the police would defend them? Either you have just spectacularly missed the point lou was making or I am about to... No one reported it to the Police because Griffin's chums gave the guy who spilt the drink a good going over. In their eyes justice was done, so why involve the law? Griffin should have drinks spilt on him, eggs thrown on him and whatever else people want to do at every available opportunity.
Tabou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Would the BNP believe the police would defend them? Would the BNP think the police have more important things like trying to catch 1 million illegal immigrants? I often here people say, i was robbed but i didn't phone the police because they don't do anything anyway.If you recall, Mr Griffin was charged on "incitement to racial hatred" charges by the CPS and the Police's employers (Labour) in 2006?, 12 men and women of the public found him and Leicester lad Mark Collett not guilty, you can add the Liverpool 12, the dawn raid on a BNP MEP candidate june 3rd?, the police took money and phones etc to stop him in his election build up, no charges, no crime committed. The police stood by and let the Labour, Conservative etc sponsered thugs of UAF attack them june 9th? this year, so why would the BNP think the police would defend them? Who did you vote for in the recent elections, out of interest?
lou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Or, just playing Devils Advocate here, it could possibly have been because his companions physically assaulted a man who had merely spilt a pint of Guiness on him? Surely the mature and professional thing to do (as befitting an MP) would have been to treat the man who did this with contempt and either report it or ignore it and go home and get cleaned up?
lou Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Either you have just spectacularly missed the point lou was making or I am about to...No one reported it to the Police because Griffin's chums gave the guy who spilt the drink a good going over. In their eyes justice was done, so why involve the law? Griffin should have drinks spilt on him, eggs thrown on him and whatever else people want to do at every available opportunity. Exactly Im sure its an occupational hazard for MP's but they dont all go around having their assailants beaten up by their "minders"
Zingari Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Exactly Im sure its an occupational hazard for MP's but they dont all go around having their assailants beaten up by their "minders" no they don't , John Prescott used to give egg throwers a good hiding himself
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Either you have just spectacularly missed the point lou was making or I am about to...No one reported it to the Police because Griffin's chums gave the guy who spilt the drink a good going over. In their eyes justice was done, so why involve the law? Griffin should have drinks spilt on him, eggs thrown on him and whatever else people want to do at every available opportunity. Did the BNP admit to giving the thug a good going over?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.