Daggers Posted 8 November 2009 Posted 8 November 2009 The teaching of history is about giving out the techniques that allow you to look at the past with a critical eye rather than repeating facts and others opinions by rote. El Empty was busy looking at Youtube clips when those techniques were being covered.
davieG Posted 8 November 2009 Posted 8 November 2009 I have no idea what you are on about here, but it doesn't seem to bear any resemblance to reality. Reality is a conspiracy by those in power not the ones we see every day they're just holograms but the real people behind them in fact they are the only people that exist. Most don't They're just illusions of themselves living in a unreal world that they believe is real. Youtube is a portal of dreamlike sequences that are put out by these people to pollute your non-existent minds. Only a few real people know this, if you don't then I can't help you as your not one of the real people and will need to carry on 'existing' in your make believe reality.
Webbo Posted 8 November 2009 Posted 8 November 2009 No one part of history is more or less important than any other. If they had learnt about that then people would just piss and moan about them not knowing the difference between Gladstone and Disraeli or something. The teaching of history is about giving out the techniques that allow you to look at the past with a critical eye rather than repeating facts and others opinions by rote. That's how it should be, although you have to know some facts before you can make a judgement. Helping my eldest with her homework on Hiroshima it struck me that she was expected to look at some with a more critical eye than others.
stez Posted 8 November 2009 Posted 8 November 2009 i suppose being taught who hitler actually was is similar to being taught brain surgery in science.
Sirloin Posted 8 November 2009 Posted 8 November 2009 That's how it should be, although you have to know some facts before you can make a judgement.Helping my eldest with her homework on Hiroshima it struck me that she was expected to look at some with a more critical eye than others. Yes, but just blindly learning stuff doesn't really help. History is such a huge subject that teaching should be geared towards teaching kids how to appreciate and enjoy it, then they can find stuff out for themselves. For that it doesn't really matter if you are studying the nazis or victorian underpant design. Hiroshima is an interesting one, I went there a few years back, very upsetting.
BoneDog Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 I forgot about this thread and I've got to say the reaction to my post is not as bad as I was expecting! I thought Bilo, DavieG and Daggers (and a few more) would slaughter me Why are you so sure what you think is true is in fact true and so damning of those who believe differently.. Perhaps what you believe is also false history. I didn't mean to sound damning of anyones views but I do believe that a 5 million exaggeration of the Holocaust should be questioned. I have looked into this quite alot and believe that the 600,000 - 1,000,000 number is the true account. It could well be that the number of jews killed in concentration camps is not around the 6 million mark. I believe that even the leading Jewish organisations have admitted such. Still, even IF it were 'just' 100.000 people, it doesn't detract from the horrific actions and mindset at the time. Those actions by the Nazi regime as well as all the other antisemites around Europe and the rest of world (who tend to be forgotten) have rightfully been condemned. I'd agree with you that a lot of genocides have by-and-large gone under the radar during recent times when they shouldn't have, but that doesn't mean we should forget or ignore the holocaust. Saying that the Jews brought on the holocaust themselves for their own benefit is just despiccable though. Only? 'Only'?! I didn't mean to say 'it was only 1,000,000' as if that is ok then. I was trying to say that the bishop and the so-called deniers say 'it was only 1,000,000 and not 6,000,000'. I think about this subject alot and I am as horrified and sickened as most people are about it, I wouldn't try to belittle what happened. And I wouldn't say that Jewish people brought it on themselves, what I meant to say was that a few zionist leaders of the time were in on it as they had already planned long before to take over The Holy Land and they knew that this would help them achieve their goal. It is known fact that alot of Hitlers apparent enemies were actually doing business with him and helping his war machine while they told the public they were doing everything they could to stop him. I have no idea what you are on about here, but it doesn't seem to bear any resemblance to reality. I was just saying that I don't think kids need to go to a Holocaust museum when in my opinion there are more recent and relevant genocides that deserve our attention nowadays if we are going to teach our kids about this kind of thing. In fairness, that's never stopped him before. Fair point, although I would say that about 94.5% of the time I am correct El Empty was busy looking at Youtube clips when those techniques were being covered. I don't spend my life on Youtube as people seem to think! Although I did spend most of yesterday on there watching courtroom fights and practical jokes.
Guest Bilo Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 I forgot about this thread and I've got to say the reaction to my post is not as bad as I was expecting! I thought Bilo, DavieG and Daggers (and a few more) would slaughter me I didn't mean to sound damning of anyones views but I do believe that a 5 million exaggeration of the Holocaust should be questioned. I have looked into this quite alot and believe that the 600,000 - 1,000,000 number is the true account. The Destruction of the European Jews is considered to be among the most seminal books ever written on the Holocaust, has been described as a monumental classic by historians and often cited as a foremost authority. It gives an estimated death toll of 5.1 million Jews though even that may be a conservative estimate as Hilberg bases his estimates on the records that are available both pre and post war, many of which were destroyed deliberately by the Nazis. 1,000,000 are known to have died in Auschwitz alone so 600,000-1,000,000 would be described by any reputable historian as a massive underestimate of the greatest crime of the Twentieth Century. I think the reason why the Holocaust is so remembered is because it was committed by sophisticated and educated European people, largely for profit and driven by a hatred that had been festering in Europe for centuries. It's something we all should learn from, especially given that Muslims are treated by some today as the Jews were at the beginning of the last century. Antisemitism is clearly very much alive and kicking across Europe, but Islamophobia has reared its ugly head in recent years and should be stamped on with the same determination if we are to learn the lessons of the past.
Raj Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 I was so thick as a Kid i didn't even know how to spell my own name let alone know who Hitler was. Look at me know!!!!!
Sirloin Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 I forgot about this thread and I've got to say the reaction to my post is not as bad as I was expecting! I thought Bilo, DavieG and Daggers (and a few more) would slaughter me I didn't mean to sound damning of anyones views but I do believe that a 5 million exaggeration of the Holocaust should be questioned. I have looked into this quite alot and believe that the 600,000 - 1,000,000 number is the true account. I didn't mean to say 'it was only 1,000,000' as if that is ok then. I was trying to say that the bishop and the so-called deniers say 'it was only 1,000,000 and not 6,000,000'. I think about this subject alot and I am as horrified and sickened as most people are about it, I wouldn't try to belittle what happened. And I wouldn't say that Jewish people brought it on themselves, what I meant to say was that a few zionist leaders of the time were in on it as they had already planned long before to take over The Holy Land and they knew that this would help them achieve their goal. It is known fact that alot of Hitlers apparent enemies were actually doing business with him and helping his war machine while they told the public they were doing everything they could to stop him. I was just saying that I don't think kids need to go to a Holocaust museum when in my opinion there are more recent and relevant genocides that deserve our attention nowadays if we are going to teach our kids about this kind of thing. Fair point, although I would say that about 94.5% of the time I am correct I don't spend my life on Youtube as people seem to think! Although I did spend most of yesterday on there watching courtroom fights and practical jokes. One of the reasons that the Holocaust and Nazi Germany are good to study is because they are contentious, and that you can see both sides in the argument. Also, the fact that one of those sides is easily refutable and can then be broadened into a study of anti-semitism is also a plus point. There are a couple of lecturers who specialise in this at Leicester Uni (or there were), and its a fascinating area of research. You don't need to scratch very hard to get to the rather unpleasant underbelly of the deniers in most cases.
Sirloin Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 The Destruction of the European Jews is considered to be among the most seminal books ever written on the Holocaust, has been described as a monumental classic by historians and often cited as a foremost authority. It gives an estimated death toll of 5.1 million Jews though even that may be a conservative estimate as Hilberg bases his estimates on the records that are available both pre and post war, many of which were destroyed deliberately by the Nazis. 1,000,000 are known to have died in Auschwitz alone so 600,000-1,000,000 would be described by any reputable historian as a massive underestimate of the greatest crime of the Twentieth Century. I think the reason why the Holocaust is so remembered is because it was committed by sophisticated and educated European people, largely for profit and driven by a hatred that had been festering in Europe for centuries. It's something we all should learn from, especially given that Muslims are treated by some today as the Jews were at the beginning of the last century. Antisemitism is clearly very much alive and kicking across Europe, but Islamophobia has reared its ugly head in recent years and should be stamped on with the same determination if we are to learn the lessons of the past. Yeah, its so well documented and proven that disagreeing with it is more than a little retarded. I mean, I've only touched on the area as most of my research is into medieval crap, but the sheer amount of evidence is overwhelming. The idea that not that many died or that they "brought it on themselves"/"collaborated" is ill disguised anti-semitism.
Wycombe Fox Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 Hitler wouldn't have been a very good football coach. He only had one ball. Although apparently, he had another one in the Albert Hall.
lou Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 My 12 year old came home yesterday announcing that drinking tea and coffee is more harmful than smoking Cannabis..... her health and social teacher had told them that!
Webbo Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 My 12 year old came home yesterday announcing that drinking tea and coffee is more harmful than smoking Cannabis..... her health and social teacher had told them that! What a knobhead (the teacher not you).
Daggers Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 Drinking 12 pints of tea and 12 pints of coffee in one sitting IS more dangerous than having one spliff. I thought everybody knew that. The only people who should teach anything about drugs are those who've had it. The same for sex ed.
Zingari Posted 10 November 2009 Posted 10 November 2009 My 12 year old came home yesterday announcing that drinking tea and coffee is more harmful than smoking Cannabis..... her health and social teacher had told them that! are you sure she didn't say "drinking tea and coffee is more harmful than smoked calamaris" i often used to mishear what teachers were saying in prayers, i thought my teacher was saying "Surely Good Mrs. Murphy shall follow me all the days of my life" but actually she was saying "Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life" good old Lady Mondegreen
The Doctor Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 My 12 year old came home yesterday announcing that drinking tea and coffee is more harmful than smoking Cannabis..... her health and social teacher had told them that! not more harmful, but smoking cannabis doesn't do that much more damage to your brain than drinking excessive amounts of tea/coffee on a regular basis (6-7 mugs a day - i think) and does a lot less damage than smoking cigarettes and drinking.
Webbo Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 not more harmful, but smoking cannabis doesn't do that much more damage to your brain than drinking excessive amounts of tea/coffee on a regular basis (6-7 mugs a day - i think) and does a lot less damage than smoking cigarettes and drinking. Forgive me if I'm wrong, I don't know a lot about drugs but surely spliffs/joints/whatever they're called are made with tobacco as well and seeing as they don't have filter tips they are surely just as harmful as cigarettes.
BoneDog Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Forgive me if I'm wrong, I don't know a lot about drugs but surely spliffs/joints/whatever they're called are made with tobacco as well and seeing as they don't have filter tips they are surely just as harmful as cigarettes. True. Marijuananana is only not harmful if you don't smoke it. It is a plant that can be digested like any food or drink. Eat it like spinach or have a cup of green tea That way it's healthy. Don't drive or use heavy machinery though
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.