Adster Posted 21 October 2010 Posted 21 October 2010 One day your overused stats will come back to haunt you...
Lord Fox Posted 21 October 2010 Posted 21 October 2010 I agree - only idiots make snap judgements after only 3 games with a new manager - ''Just puzzled as to why people would want to bring back a player who has contributed nothing while we have garnered 7 points and been unbeaten in 3 games'' Who's to say that if Fryatt had played we wouldn't have had 9 points instead- it seems the the Radio Leicester commentary team and members of the forum (myself included) over the past 3 game have voiced.. ooh, if only we’d taken those chances, or we should really be 3 - 0 up at half time.
lou Posted 21 October 2010 Posted 21 October 2010 Fryatt is "meh" in my book. When he's on form, he's a quality striker and you only wonder what he'd be capable of or who he'd be playing for if he did it for an entire season. However, he has more average or bad games than he has good, is prone to looking extremely disinterested, wastes far too many "easy" chances and has a habit of taking too many touches / being too greedy when he has support in better positions. That's not to say he's the worst player at the club, but he's hardly the answer to all of our problems and sure as hell isn't irreplaceable. Spot on Jamie!!!
lou Posted 21 October 2010 Posted 21 October 2010 Who's to say that if Fryatt had played we wouldn't have had 9 points instead- it seems the the Radio Leicester commentary team and members of the forum (myself included) over the past 3 game have voiced.. ooh, if only we’d taken those chances, or we should really be 3 - 0 up at half time. Hes the worst offender for not taking his chances!!!
HonradaRaposa Posted 21 October 2010 Author Posted 21 October 2010 But it's only working based on 3 games - the exact thing you're questioning about someone making a snap judgement based on 3 games. Bless you That's not a snap judgement is it? It is fact in the history books
ajthefox Posted 21 October 2010 Posted 21 October 2010 Fryatt is "meh" in my book. When he's on form, he's a quality striker and you only wonder what he'd be capable of or who he'd be playing for if he did it for an entire season. However, he has more average or bad games than he has good, is prone to looking extremely disinterested, wastes far too many "easy" chances and has a habit of taking too many touches / being too greedy when he has support in better positions. That's not to say he's the worst player at the club, but he's hardly the answer to all of our problems and sure as hell isn't irreplaceable. Can't disagree with any of this really. I like Fryatt because finishing can be very good and I think it's obvious if things went his way and he played a whole season he would definitiely surpass the 20 mark, and I rekon he would end up wth just over 25. However this hasn't ever really happened for him, which is a great shame imo.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.