MC Prussian Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 :crylaugh: :crylaugh: You have no fookin idea about football do you. The kick in the back resulted in a sending off for voilent conduct which carries a 3 game ban. Why rush for the ball the game wasn't going to lose any time, sheer stupidity. How many games was the petulant tit suspended for? Hmmm, thats right 3 games Why stating the obvious? I know he got banned for apparent "violent conduct". That was the referee's point of view. To me and to many other Leicester fans, it was a harsh decision that never granted a red. I might have no fookin idea about football, but I know one thing for sure and it's that your a grumpy old man who revels in winding other people up. I bet you've been posting on here before, just under a different username and have now come back to destroy us all with the wrath built up over the years. You make no sense apart from the fact that you do make no sense.
caz05 Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 I am enjoying the win, but I would enjoy it more if I wasn't reading people advocating bringing in poor players. So are you all going to get the hump when the fans favourites in Fryatt and Howard are bombed for better players? Sven is going to remove the dross I can't see the issue. So what about waggy then? Because if my ears were working properly,it was actually howard who came on and scored,and the other from a defender.
escos Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Fryatt is a good player and under the right managment I beleive will become a better player but there is no getting away from the fact he is known for sulking and acting like a spoilt kid at times. However I trust Sven to put that right. And IMO what he did against Norwich was wrong and out of order!
ScouseFox Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 How anyone can excuse his performances against Coventry and QPR where he didn't bother his arse is beyond me. That is before you even start on his piss poor scoring record in this league. Sven will sort it Last season he got 12 in 29 games. This season he's on 2 from 3 starts. That's not a bad scoring record.
sdb Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 I'm well happy thank you. Just puzzled as to why people would want to bring back a player who has contributed nothing while we have garnered 7 points and been unbeaten in 3 games, while said player was suspended for being a petulant twat. Better players to come in, Sven will take us away from the dross of days gone by. didn't Fryatt score two in his last game? having come off the bench?
hackneyfox Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Why?....Is Sense not allowed? Well said. I agree with him, I'll be happy to see most of our players on the bench, as back up to Sven's new and improved ones. Dyer and Fryatt in The Premierr?
Guest BlueBrett Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 I am enjoying the win, but I would enjoy it more if I wasn't reading people advocating bringing in poor players.So are you all going to get the hump when the fans favourites in Fryatt and Howard are bombed for better players? Sven is going to remove the dross I can't see the issue. Listen mate...You go on about people bumming Fryatt all the time as if he has his own private fan club but in reality that just isn't the case. In this instance especially all the guy did was to mention that we have him coming back from a ban which broadens our offensive options. That is hardly bumming. The truth is that the reasoning behind most peoples' support for Fryatt is much more sound than the logic underpinning your disdain for him. He had a great season 2 years ago and was on course for another really successful one last year before getting injured. This year he has hardly featured but when he has he has looked pretty sharp and up for it. All the so called Fryatt bum boys are doing is pointing out these facts in his defence when you launch one of your unsubstantiated attacks on him. It is the essence of being a supporter and supporting your team which includes the individual players. When Fryatt gets back and has had an extended run in the team, 10-15 games or so, you can start calling him shit again if his performances deserve it. At the moment though it just seems ridiculous and makes you sound like an idiot.
Legend_in_blue Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 All this criticism of Fryatt when he hasn't played a single ball under Svennis is a little harsh. May I suggest holding back an opinion until Svennis picks him for a game? Granted, Fryatt continues to divide opinion but since the league 1 season, where he looked mighty (although most strikers would given the time and space allowed to turn in a circle akin to an articulated lorry) and his performances last season, surely he deserves "game time" to impress under Svennis. As for tonight, it's looking good for Svennis. Very good.
Bugg Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Last season he got 12 in 29 games. This season he's on 2 from 3 starts. That's not a bad scoring record. There's no point arguing about it, he won't listen as he has a blinkered view and thinks that he is right all the time even when he has no clue what he's on about.
MC Prussian Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 No. Any player that turns out for Leicester City and doesn't even bother to try when thousands have spent their money to support and pay their wages can fook off. I have no interest in them. If you are foolish enough to continue to lend your support to someone with the moral fibre of that selfish fooker then hell mend you. As other's have already pointed out, he scored twice at Norwich, bringing us back into the game and put in a more than just decent performance before the sending off. How on earth you can still claim he's no good, I don't know. He's been a little missed in the past three games and I'm sure he'll be burning to play from the start against Swansea. See, I'm a wee optimistic now. Not getting carried away, just a wee optimistic. Whereas you can go yourself with your negative "doom and gloom" attitude.
HonradaRaposa Posted 19 October 2010 Author Posted 19 October 2010 Why stating the obvious? I know he got banned for apparent "violent conduct". That was the referee's point of view. To me and to many other Leicester fans, it was a harsh decision that never granted a red. I might have no fookin idea about football, but I know one thing for sure and it's that your a grumpy old man who revels in winding other people up. I bet you've been posting on here before, just under a different username and have now come back to destroy us all with the wrath built up over the years. You make no sense apart from the fact that you do make no sense. So kicking a player in the back is acceptable then? Well done I didn't know this existed until a few months back when someone on Bentleys mentioned it, the sheer comedy of some supporters on here astounds me, so I thought I join in. But if you as a moderator have an issue then you know what you can do
Dylan Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 How anyone can excuse his performances against Coventry and QPR where he didn't bother his arse is beyond me. That is before you even start on his piss poor scoring record in this league. Sven will sort it Last season in the league: 12 in 29 appearances, a few of which when he was just coming back from injury. Average of 0.41 goals/game. Multiplied by 46 league games: 19 goals Would've put him 3rd top scorer last season in the Championship, but piss poor isn't it?
HonradaRaposa Posted 19 October 2010 Author Posted 19 October 2010 Last season in the league: 12 in 29 appearances, a few of which when he was just coming back from injury. Average of 0.41 goals/game. Multiplied by 46 league games: 19 goals Would've put him 3rd top scorer last season in the Championship, but piss poor isn't it? You ignore the actual 1:5 ratio he has then.
Bugg Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 So kicking a player in the back is acceptable then? Well done I didn't know this existed until a few months back when someone on Bentleys mentioned it, the sheer comedy of some supporters on here astounds me, so I thought I join in. But if you as a moderator have an issue then you know what you can do Oh come on! It was hardly the falcon kick you're making it out to be, it was a little tap.
Corky Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Fryatt may well score goals under Sven, we don't know yet. If he does then great, if he doesn't then Sven will try and get someone else in, so we don't do too badly either way.
ScouseFox Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 You ignore the actual 1:5 ratio he has then. Which starts from about 2006, when we were a completely different team. If you look at most players, you'll find that they have bad seasons and good seasons, they peak at times and go through rough patches. If you're using his scoring record from 4 years ago to back up why he shouldn't be playing now, then just give up.
HonradaRaposa Posted 19 October 2010 Author Posted 19 October 2010 Oh come on! It was hardly the falcon kick you're making it out to be, it was a little tap. It doesn't matter, it was still a stupid kick which constitutes violent conduct. We've had some piss poor refs this season but that decision was 100% correct, at the time I thought it was wrong but my position in the stand didn't give the view the ref and TV cameras saw.
hackneyfox Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Sven wants players with pace. This love fest with Fryatt and Dyer is ridiculous. They are both adequate players, who on their day, can look good. They aren't a long term answer. I hope I'm proved wrong, but I've seen nothing to think I will be.
caz05 Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 didn't Fryatt score two in his last game? having come off the bench? Yes he did mate,but this thick twate reckons he shows no passion and cant be arsed to play for the team,but when he does show passion by trying to get the ball back of a fooking cheat,who thinks its ok to lay on it,he gets called for that. This person doesnt like any of the team,he even slates Dyer who in my opinion we miss when hes not thier
Dylan Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 You ignore the actual 1:5 ratio he has then. 1:5 ratio? Your surely not going to count the 05-08 seasons, when we were always fighting against relegation, and he was developing as a player?
HonradaRaposa Posted 19 October 2010 Author Posted 19 October 2010 Which starts from about 2006, when we were a completely different team. If you look at most players, you'll find that they have bad seasons and good seasons, they peak at times and go through rough patches. If you're using his scoring record from 4 years ago to back up why he shouldn't be playing now, then just give up. There is no escaping it's 1:5. Sven knows and that is why Sven is looking to bring in more strikers, I can't see the problem.
MC Prussian Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 So kicking a player in the back is acceptable then? Well done I didn't know this existed until a few months back when someone on Bentleys mentioned it, the sheer comedy of some supporters on here astounds me, so I thought I join in. But if you as a moderator have an issue then you know what you can do I think it's fair to say your the only one doing an "entertaining one" at the minute. Btw, Fryatt did NOT kick Barnett in the back. He pushed him with his knee. If at all, both him and Barnett should've been shown a yellow card apiece. But that was the referee back then, and god knows what shite referees we've had to put up with in the past. And also - who scored two against Norwich after being brought on from the bench?
hackneyfox Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Fryatt got sent off because he kicked a player. How hard doesn't come into it, he'd scored 2 goals and then he acted like a fool.
caz05 Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Listen mate...You go on about people bumming Fryatt all the time as if he has his own private fan club but in reality that just isn't the case. In this instance especially all the guy did was to mention that we have him coming back from a ban which broadens our offensive options. That is hardly bumming. The truth is that the reasoning behind most peoples' support for Fryatt is much more sound than the logic underpinning your disdain for him. He had a great season 2 years ago and was on course for another really successful one last year before getting injured. This year he has hardly featured but when he has he has looked pretty sharp and up for it. All the so called Fryatt bum boys are doing is pointing out these facts in his defence when you launch one of your unsubstantiated attacks on him. It is the essence of being a supporter and supporting your team which includes the individual players. When Fryatt gets back and has had an extended run in the team, 10-15 games or so, you can start calling him shit again if his performances deserve it. At the moment though it just seems ridiculous and makes you sound like an idiot.
Dylan Posted 19 October 2010 Posted 19 October 2010 Can we count the 100's he probably scored at Sunday League level when he was a kid?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.