Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Baby Elvis

Bednar OR Howard?

By Baby Elvis, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Swalker

Swalker

Posted
Posted

Howard every day. Bednar has had so much expected of him and he hasn't looked threatening at the goal, doesn't look very strong and even though he links play well he always seems to play with his back to goal. I think that he would be more suited to be played with a 2nd striker

Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted

Howard. Bednar would score goals in League one but i don't see him scoring many for us during his loan like Fryatt. Waste of a loan signing. Fryatt is better than Bednar technically.

Baby Elvis

Baby Elvis

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Howard every day. Bednar has had so much expected of him and he hasn't looked threatening at the goal, doesn't look very strong and even though he links play well he always seems to play with his back to goal. I think that he would be more suited to be played with a 2nd striker

So who do you think bedners ideal strike partner would be??

Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted

So who do you think bedners ideal strike partner would be??

He's like a Mark De vries player really so a striker like Fryatt that gets the knock on ball with his feet and is good on the ball. So either Fryatt or Waghorn.

Baby Elvis

Baby Elvis

Posted
  • Author
Posted

He's like a Mark De vries player really so a striker like Fryatt that gets the knock on ball with his feet and is good on the ball. So either Fryatt or Waghorn.

Interesting comment! I am sure this has been said in the forum but sven needs to opt for a more out and out goal scorer! are strikers are letting the side down! :chant:

Swalker

Swalker

Posted
Posted

He's like a Mark De vries player really so a striker like Fryatt that gets the knock on ball with his feet and is good on the ball. So either Fryatt or Waghorn.

Yes so he would need either Vassel, Waghorn or Fryatt or if he can score goals himself Howard

white_y

white_y

Posted
Posted

Bednar, that's why he will get played more than Howard as he is a proven premier league goal scorer, if somebody tells me Howard is don't make me laugh, at least Bednar offers fitness and pace which I feel Howard lacks, which is why he comes off the bench so often. also can I make the point that Howard steps up in all of the big games for example Cardiff last semi away leg. for me it's got to be Bednar by a distance and also we have not seen Bednar's full potential in a blues strip as he needs to settle in.

SO BASICALLY BEDNAR, THEN HOWARD OFF THE BENCH, NOT WHAT HE USED TO BE, THIS IS A DIFFERENT LEICESTER NOW.

Swalker

Swalker

Posted
Posted

Bednar, that's why he will get played more than Howard as he is a proven premier league goal scorer, if somebody tells me Howard is don't make me laugh, at least Bednar offers fitness and pace which I feel Howard lacks, which is why he comes off the bench so often. also can I make the point that Howard steps up in all of the big games for example Cardiff last semi away leg. for me it's got to be Bednar by a distance and also we have not seen Bednar's full potential in a blues strip as he needs to settle in. SO BASICALLY BEDNAR, THEN HOWARD OFF THE BENCH, NOT WHAT HE USED TO BE, THIS IS A DIFFERENT LEICESTER NOW.

I would agree that we haven't seen the best of Bednar yet but if he is this prolific goal scorer how come he has played for the majority of both Forest and Watford games and he has had 1 shot in each game. He is a prolific goal scorer in a formation where he isn't the lone striker

Guest NGoloMode

Guest NGoloMode

Posted
Posted

Bednar, that's why he will get played more than Howard as he is a proven premier league goal scorer, if somebody tells me Howard is don't make me laugh, at least Bednar offers fitness and pace which I feel Howard lacks, which is why he comes off the bench so often. also can I make the point that Howard steps up in all of the big games for example Cardiff last semi away leg. for me it's got to be Bednar by a distance and also we have not seen Bednar's full potential in a blues strip as he needs to settle in.

SO BASICALLY BEDNAR, THEN HOWARD OFF THE BENCH, NOT WHAT HE USED TO BE, THIS IS A DIFFERENT LEICESTER NOW.

I respectfully disagree :whistle:

Ozwin

Ozwin

Posted
Posted

Did I read that right, someone compared Bednar to Mark de Vries. Seriously? And nobody picked up on it until now?

This is a big inside joke on me isn't it? Come on FoxesTalk, come on out you sly dogs!

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I'll judge when i've seen Bednar play a few more games for us.

Steady on with your sensible approach, there's no room for that on here, offer us a wildly speculative opinion :D:thumbup:

VampLCFC

VampLCFC

Posted
Posted

Neither! Bednar's first touch is diabolical!

Howard, love the guy for his passion and commitment, but maybe he is a little bit past it and the amount of fouls he gives away is becoming a bit of a joke, I do realise that referees tend to pick on him a bit, so think we need a different approach.

We need that fast young 20 year old that is going to bang in 20-25 goals a season, that was supposed to be Waghorn, but what has he done since his £3M price tag?!?!

VampLCFC

VampLCFC

Posted
Posted

I agree, why not play a 4-3-3

Weale

Naughton

Davies

Vitor

Cunningham

Abe

King

Wellens

Vassell

Waghorn

Gallagher

We could be deadly

Heart-Shaped Fox

Heart-Shaped Fox

Posted
Posted

I'm not sure, Bednar is a bit more mobile, but you know Howard will always be in the game.

I think I'd give Bednar another game ot two, but then thats his lot. Needs to get a goal really.

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted

Bednar. Ridiculous to judge him so early, typical bloody City fans. You'd have think some of you would have learned after Yuki Abe. :whistle:

Bednar isn't some questionably dodgy reject we've picked up on a free, he's a solid player with a proven track record. He's just massively out of match fitness and sharpness and needs to be played in to both.

Steve Howard is over the hill. He isn't a ninety minute player any longer. When we give him a bit of a head start and send him on against tired legs he does come on fighting and he does galvanize us - so leave him to that role.

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted

Howard has more passion

Oh right, oh well that's okay then.

As long as he's got passion - brilliant, get him on.

Oh by the way, I've got more passion than basically all of them combined, I mean I actually support the side so can I play too? I reckon we could find a spot in the line up for Thracian and Daggers, n'all. Oh. And anotherofwalshieswomen.

Lisa up front?

l444ry

l444ry

Posted
Posted

Howard has more passion

What good is passion alone if all it achieves is a succession of free-kicks against. I agree with Finnegan. But Bednar needs to make his mark sooner rather than later..

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted

What good is passion alone if all it achieves is a succession of free-kicks against. I agree with Finnegan. But Bednar needs to make his mark sooner rather than later..

Of course, he can't labour under the excuse of needing to find fitness forever, I agree.

But I just can't personally see him needing to. He's clearly a very solid player. Thirty goals in eighty games for West Brom, as a target man? Not too shabby, really. Must be better than Howard's return for us.

Guest ttfn

Guest ttfn

Posted
Posted

Bednar has been total turd in both games so far. Had Fryatt put in those 2 performances people would be burning effigies of him on the Narborough Road

We don't have time to be playing Bednar in to form. We need to start scoring sooner rather than later.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...