cc_star Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 At least we won something last season, worst value in the transfer market!!! http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/championship/einkaufswerte/wettbewerb_GB2.html With £18,647,200 spent we returned the lowest points per £, lowest wins per £, lowest goals per £ Don't think this includes agents fees (which season before we were by far the highest spenders) Doesn't include paying off remainder of Sven's £3m contract or re-acquisition of NP Doesn't include premiership wages presumably paid out to attract the likes of Beckford, Pantsil, Konchesky, Mills & others. Some people on here can't see why NP is having to wheel & deal with their potential 'favourite' rumoured to be leaving, or why their rumoured valuations are lower than they think it should be... And others are baffled why we're not linked with Beckham, Henry again and having to re-join reality & sign players that Sven wouldn't have even pissed on in his search to blow the most amount of money in the shortest time he could. When it comes down to it some people have played fast & loose with the very future of our club again! And even if the owners are happy to cover it, the debt & interest built up in our name is still going to be a huge drag on finances for years to come. Anyway rant over, hail Sven, hail Top & let's get back to business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 At least we won something last season, worst value in the transfer market!!! http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/championship/einkaufswerte/wwettbewerb_GB2.html With £18,647,200 spent we returned the lowest points per £, lowest wins per £, lowest goals per £ Don't think this includes agents fees (which season before we were by far the highest spenders) Doesn't include paying off remainder of Sven's £3m contract or re-acquisition of NP Doesn't include premiership wages presumably paid out to attract the likes of Beckford, Pantsil, Konchesky, Mills & others. Some people on here can't see why NP is having to wheel & deal with their potential 'favourite' rumoured to be leaving, or why their rumoured valuations are lower than they think it should be... And others are baffled why we're not linked with Beckham, Henry again and having to re-join reality & sign players that Sven wouldn't have even pissed on in his search to blow the most amount of money in the shortest time he could. When it comes down to it some people have played fast & loose with the very future of our club again! And even if the owners are happy to cover it, the debt & interest built up in our name is still going to be a huge drag on finances for years to come. Anyway rant over, hail Sven, hail Top & let's get back to business. Superb post IMO. The chickens have come home to roost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jace Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 Beckham has been left out the Olympic team? Shame he wasn't picked instead of Milner for the Euros then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentFox Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 They needed to run a survey to tell us that ? Could have just asked anyone on here for free ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cc_star Posted 28 June 2012 Author Share Posted 28 June 2012 Edited with the right link in the OP... stupid phone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carter The Boss Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 Great post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellyfox Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 They needed to run a survey to tell us that ? Could have just asked anyone on here for free ! Not sure about that most on here don't understeand why we have not gone out and spent 20mil yet. Most don't remember we gotta pay that all back and more plus 8% and don't understand what FFP is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hirsty The Blue 94 Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 Not sure about that most on here don't understeand why we have not gone out and spent 20mil yet. Most don't remember we gotta pay that all back and more plus 8% and don't understand what FFP is. I don't think many on this forum (including myself) understand the full ramifications of FFP so only Nigel and the owners will know what they have to ship out to be sustainable and balance the books. We will know the full extent of Sven's splashing by the end of August, if we have signed nobody else and sold half of our existing squad we are in serious trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollism Posted 28 June 2012 Share Posted 28 June 2012 To me, this table doesn't mean a great deal. Look who is second in the table of pounds/point. It's West Ham, but the fact of the matter is they got promoted and don't regret spending £22m, but we didn't and we now know that spending £18m was a mistake. The season wasn't a failure because we didn't get enough points, it was a failure because we didn't get promoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 29 June 2012 Share Posted 29 June 2012 Which came from not having enough points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattGamble92 Posted 30 June 2012 Share Posted 30 June 2012 The funniest thing about that table is Forest spent **** all. Yet their points cost them nearly the most! HAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted 2 July 2012 Share Posted 2 July 2012 http://www.thisislei...tail/story.html Every victory Leicester City earned last season cost them £1,035.956, according to new figures released. Every goal City scored cost them £282,533, according to the figures compiled by statistics website transfermarket.co.uk. Leicester City boss Nigel Pearson. Every City win last season cost the club £1,035.956 ew figures show the cost of every City win according to new figures The statistics show how much money, measured against the purchase prices of all players, the clubs in the Championship spent for one point, one goal and one win. While City were not the highest spenders in the division, which was West Ham, according to the statistics, they finished bottom of the table in terms of their performance return relative to their financial outlay. According to the statistics, City spent £18,647,200 last season and collected 66 points, which equates to £282,533 per point. As City finished the season having scored exactly the same number of goals, it equated to the same cost per goal. Top of the table was Watford, who spent just £1,342,000 but finished 11th on 64 points, scoring 56 goals, which equated to £20,696 per point, £23,964 per goal and £83,875 a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.