MrLuke

Sorry, my bad. Just read the definition: "A good deed is an action done to help, protect, comfort, or benefit someone else — usually without expecting anything in return, unless you are from Coventry."

Well, it is a good deed. You've just decided it isn't because the guy earns a lot of money and it's on camera. I'm sure the recipient thinks it's a good deed - which is all that matters.

I agree. Wouldn't have been my first choice but I'll support him. Get the impression he's a bit of a slow starter while his style is embedded, I think that could be the trickiest time for us. He's a tough job on his hands - a fractured fan base, some players with bad attitudes and poor club leadership. Good luck, you're going to need it.

Hmm, not sure I agree with the comparison 😆 I think what you've said is totally subjective. You can look at him, his record (prior to the premier League season) and personality and like him. The problem is many people have, like cooper, already made their minds up that it's a poor choice and to assassinate his character. It may well be a poor appointment. But considing the negative rut we are in it seems counter productive to constantly be on a downer when we aren't able to do anything about the appointment. To clarify, I'm in no way a pro-Martin person, but I will personally support him.

agree, passion for the badge, willingness to run more than 5 yards before giving up and blaming everyone and everything else would be a start.

As I've said before, I'm still willing to give him a chance. Every manager deserves that. Right now though we're back in Cooper territory: everyone's judged him before he's started. I still feel the frustration with the ownership for this move. I get the anger and resentment at how the club's being run. But FFS, let's at least see how he pans out. The negativity's all-encompassing at the minute and I can't be arsed with it. We will forever be in this negative death spiral otherwise. I'll give him time. And if it doesn't work out, I'll throw all my vitriol back where it belongs: at the ownership. But he does have great hair.

I'll support him, because what other choice do we have? I probably have a case of stockholm syndrome tbf. I will give him a chance, but I won't watch another interview of a manager talking about their vision for the club. They all talk a good game, very few actually follow it up by fulfilling those statements on the pitch with passion and results. One thing I will say: FFS please get this team strong and fit. my daughter's under 9 team has more stamina than these jokers. Edit: i had started watching his video and turned it off when the edit made him look at the subscribe button as it appeared on screen. Irritating.

Fair enough, just thought I would add my thoughts. Personally I find the call out boxes leading. Like I say though, great work.

Some great work there @Foxes_Trust My only issue is the use of the blue call-out boxes that are used inconsistently in the presentation. They amplify certain responses: (e.g. combining poor and very poor results into one total, highlighting 25% think the foxes trust has effectivness has improved when 50% didnt see a change) but not others. I think that removes the neutrality of the survey and undermines it. It then becomes more editorial which gives the club the opportunity to push back on it.

Problem is, Top doesn't have a clue what is going wrong at the club, so he would never sack Rudkin. This is a guy who is still scratching his head as to how we got relegated from the Prem in '23. I get the impression from his interviews that getting him to understand the day to day workings of a football club would be similar to trying to explain thermodynamics to a Labrador.

I won two tickets for the Preston game via Sky bet. I think the redeemable value of the free tickets was 0.001p so I may see if I can have the money instead.

I hate me too, it's fine.

Connections Puzzle #998 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟪🟪🟪🟪

Wordle 1,720 4/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩⬛🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Connections Puzzle #997 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟪🟪🟪🟪 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟩🟩🟩🟩