AKCJ

Boom boom booom lemme hear you say Woyo

Wonder if the club will release these accounts to the public earlier than they normally would given they're ready to go?

We could sell him before the PSR deadline so that it falls within the same accounting period as any January signings.

I think we're better letting him stay at Stoke on loan than accepting £7m now. I think if he continues to have a good season then he will still be worth that sort of money and with Vardy retiring and Daka being Daka it'll be important that we've either got a striker that we know can score goals at that level or one that will tempt the Championship clubs that can afford to spend £10-£12m.

I don't think we'd accept £7m.

This summer has to be the restart. Especially if we go down. There needs to be a complete reset of wage structure. Get back to focussing on spending transfer fees on young players with potential sprinkled amongst experienced players with a point to prove.

But have they appealed or is it a case that they might appeal?

They've appealed our appeal? I thought the general consensus was that they'd be wasting their time doing that.

Those thinking we will now be able to freely sign players for as much as we like are in for a rude awakening. We'll have got away with this by the skin of our teeth. We're still paying players like Ward, Vestergaard, Coady, Daka, Soumare, and Choudhury over £50k a week. Outside of Mads and potentially Bilal, we won't have the luxury of selling high end players to pay for these wages this summer either. Although it'll be horrible to see him go, it'll definitely be welcome to have Vardy's wages off the books.

I thought this was the 3-year accounting period leading up to 23/24? (As in 21/22, 22/23 and 23/24)

So how can it still be up in the air? Surely this is done and dusted now?

Am I getting this right? Leicester's accounts show they're between the £105m and £83m allowable losses. The Premier League decide not to charge because they think we're entitled to the £105m loss limit. The independent panel that decides punishments has the final say and they may decide that we are only entitled to £83m losses.

I agree with what you're saying I just find it weird that a club can raise and nurture a player and then right when he's on the brink of first team football he (along with dozens of other players) gets pinched for next to nothing by a club with unlimited money to see which of them can make it as a high level player. It's miniscule risk and potentially a massive reward for clubs like Man City and PSG.

It's very likely that the press have been briefed by now.

Watch this get announced an hour or so after we announce that we're challenging the Premier League's decision to charge us.

It'll be relegation if it's more than 2.

Yeah sorry I mean how close to that are we? Pretty sure we lost like 100m each in 21/22 and 22/23 so we must have had to make a tidy profit in 23/24 to get over the line, no? Not sure we would have.

Anyone know how much we're allowed to lose before we go over the limit? Just want to know how bad it is.

12pm on the last working day before a game so tomorrow.

I've seen similar reviews from Serie A fans in that he's a solid player who could do well in a league as fast and physical as the Premier League. I'm quietly optimistic.

IIRC Sheffield United were charged by the EFL for the -2 point deduction they have for this season while they were still a Premier League team. I'd imagine it would be similar.

Can't he go now?

On the grounds that Kristiansen is definitely shit.