Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Manwell Pablo

Member
  • Posts

    35,073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by Manwell Pablo

  1. Just so everyone knows the "Unite for change" movement posted by Project Reset is the joining together of the various groups that have made efforts to change the way the club is run, and will be working on the attempting to organise protests. Obviously anyone who want's to do their own thing in any way they wish to, in a non violent manner, is supported. This group will just be trying to organise things on a large scale.
  2. I read it wrong then so I'll apologise.
  3. What? No, I'll talk to the person who tried to dispute what I was saying because it wasn't reported in the Sun.
  4. "The media certainly doesn’t seem to have got the memo about the decision coming ‘sometime in February’" Maybe I know more than the media.
  5. @teblin@ClaphamFox Apologies will be accepted in person or in writing.
  6. I mean as much as I hate to defend Rudkin the lads scored 5 goals in 41 appearances for them and two of them were against us who let every striker short of a goal in the Championship score against us and they paid 10 million for him, it's one of his better ones
  7. No they were "don't reacall" (in regards to Kaebi) "being anything like Musaka" I mean in a way you were very correct.
  8. From what I've heard it's suppose to be happening sometime in February. Of course it get's to the 4th of February and the forum is in meltdown as to why it's not happened yet.
  9. We'll see how he gets on and I do hope he does well as we are at serious risk of going down, but it's a totally different ball game playing regularly at this level, in this team in particular, over any period of time. Any video of academy football is not worth the paper it's written on, the only Manchester City U21's game result I can remember seeing this season is them getting a 4-1 hiding against Rotherham. Who play in the same league as Doncaster, Doncaster's Under 18's got beat 3-1 by Ashby Ivanhoe's first team. Pretty sure anyone (Luke Thomas included) Could be made to look good by putting together youth team clips. Or even full games. Levels. In terms of immediate effect, I am not sold on the idea, at all. You've got a team one point above us signing a lad with 31 England caps on loan, and who got Patrick Bamford in on 2 month short term deal to prove himself and went on to score 6 in 13 for them, that's the kind of business that'll do you well in this division. I'm all for investing in youth but apparently I keep being told we have enough of our own and we should be focusing on our own anyway, he'll be going back and is here to make an immediate impact, I just doubt he will.
  10. I mean I was the first to jump on that Karbi video (as I’m about to on this one) but tbf to Kaebi it was at a World Cup not an under 18s/21s games where you can hit areas far easier than you can in the championship. And that’s all he’s doing, hitting areas, looks good when it comes off but if you think he’ll spread 50 yard balls to Abdul and Stephi with any consistency you are gravely, gravely mistaken. YouTube vidoes are a waste of time.
  11. We'll bring him down to our level don't worry.
  12. The joke was if he's as good as the Divine Moussaka I had in Corfu in the summer we might finish 17th . Or something similar. Old Wasyl has come steaming in and not got the ball as usual and ruined it for everyone.
  13. Mostly rightly so, we do not have the funds or the players to make his system even close to effective. Not to mention the fact he'd have to be several screws lose to take this job. Ridiculous suggestion all around really. But then I imagine it was posted to get the reaction it has as opposed to a serious suggestion.
  14. Talk is continuing. Please be patient, as it has already been handily pointed out this fixture is some way away yet there is no need to start making major announcements a month out and let it fizzle out by the time of the game. Also....remember the people behind this have families to look after, jobs to hold down, etc, they aren't at it 9-5. And this was scoping, for general interest as well as specifically Norwich interest, hence why the third option was added. Top is also good at one thing and that is mitigating things like this, when the chips are down he finds a way to take the pressure off himself and regain faith with his supporters/people on the fence and also get them talking about something else, sacking Marti and coming out and doing that interview has earned him some favour in some quarters and has threads like this get diluted by people wanting to discuss the sacking/new managers/the interview etc, so it's important we time our own actions for maximum effect. As was done with the WBA game. I am not guaranteeing anything about Norwich but obviously something will have to happen in the not so distant future, but I'd strap yourself in for some bad times as I envisage the process of getting Top out of the club will take a long time and things will not get any better until months after he has relinquished control and the results of any rebuild start to take effect. Assuming he sells it to someone suitable which is another issue but hopefully the new look Trust can be somewhat involved in that process to Safeguard it. Obviously every positive vote we get helps so keep em coming.
  15. Past the players or the management, people need to get this ingrained into there heads.
  16. 2-0 loss to Charlton at home is about as bad as it gets in terms of one off results I am afraid The performance was an improvement and the sending off was a massive problem I do admit, but then I say again, Charlton, at home, not exactly the most testing fixture on the fixtures list is it, and we have nothing to show for it. Birmingham away Southampton at home and Boro and Stoke away coming up with a potential points being taken off in the mean time...this is all a potential disaster in the making I am afraid.
  17. I'll say it again. Refusing to take action against this ownership because "Kingy and the lads need our support" is ignoring the root cause of all this mess which will only get worse no matter how much cheering and singing you do, this is why people saying things like that are not helping, this is why action against the board is needed, and soon, because Top will take some shifting out of this club I can guarantee you that. It is going to take someone with far more experience than King to get anything out of this lot for a sustainable period of time, a manager our ownership can neither afford nor have the nuance to identify even if they could.
  18. I'm going to say you're an exception to the digital age rule then
  19. I was about to say it was interesting you didn't see anything, it had national press coverage. Knowing you I get the impression you probably use Facebook more than anything else although it was covered on there by a few groups, and I personally do have a group in mind for that who get good coverage yes, leave X to the other members.
  20. The very small club in the Midlands line made me laugh. We aren't Shepshed Dynamo
  21. You read humor well don't you.
  22. You're point has been duly taken on board. As proven here though, not everyone understands these things need to be prepped and timed if they are going to work properly and you get the question why aren't we doing this in 4 days time. Although I should state I do however fully endorse anyone wanting to make a fuss on Saturday, or anyone not going, please do crack on.
  23. When that Yes number looks more favorable.
  24. This isn't really about that it's about organising doing something and gaging some numbers on here as an early step before some tweets start to go out. 1) There are plenty of topics on that subject should you wish to discuss it. 2) The wording is specifically would you protest, some might have a desire for things to change at the club, but be unwilling to physically protest, for numerous reasons.
  25. No as it's got a Poll, obviously it's 2026. @Mark Any help would be good mate.
×
×
  • Create New...