Manwell Pablo

Magnificent creatures. Myself and Tony have been seen in the same room however and I doubt he's still alive tbh.

And why would you think that.

......Does that not ring an alarm bell to you.

You don't understand gambling addicts very well then. 100% guarantee in a moment of weakness at least a few will have relapsed into one of the less reproable companies (and BC Games seems to be about as "less reproable" as you can get) littering English football teams shirts as they will be ones they are not self excluded from and more importantly companies like BC Game will not care if they are self excluded elsewhere.

Completely. Needs putting on his grave stone, "Here lies Wout Faes, finally gone to ground at the appropriate moment"

I've got us in any game involving him mate. After Al's pre match team talk, You'll have had Marko Stamenic and Ji-Sung Eom asking Cameron Burgess who the **** Manwell Pablo is anyway in the tunnel. That's why they were garbage for the first 25 minutes. Just need to get in for half time so he can start ranting about me again. (Rent Free)

Bending certainly. However Chelsea's company that answers to the PL rules has kept it's nose clean, that's all that matters, these clubs are run by rich successful men, rich successful men who have got to be rich and successful in parts by bending rules emplaced by international governments, so if they are good at it (Top and co are not) they aren't going to have a problem with the PL, using their holding companies, and selling assets for fair market value, using for sponsorship to shift money from other companies to the football club for high, but not completely unreasonable fee's. etc I am not sure what more you want the PL to do other than charge them, the PL vs Manchester City has been going on for donkeys mainly because City have been fighting it and will probably continue to fight it tooth and nail, and have loop holes, something we are allowed to do apparently but no one else is according to you, there is not any conclusive verdict on if they've actually done anything wrong yet btw , you are making assumptions, and their lawyers seem confident the PL charges are misplaced. I have no idea what will happen to them if they are found guilty, perhaps you should wait and see before you start getting irate about it? This all detracts from the main issue, our club is a disorganised mess when it comes to it's running's. If we cannot even submit accounts we are going to get charged aren't we, we've made it easy for them and complaining about inconsistency in the rules detracts from the real issue, we need the club to be run in a far more efficient manner than it is.

I haven't heard that one before but no I doubt that would be a points deduction, that sounds more like a fine. Points deductions are generally to do with Profit and Sustainability rules. Again does it really matter. We shouldn't be making excuses for the failings at the top of the club, we should be highlighting them. You did kind of throw a hand grenade into the forum by attacking the fans, not saying I don't agree with some of the points you've made but your always going to get a reaction posting that

And again, this is an ill informed point of view because the PL have charged Manchester City with 115 charges and they have a hearing in October, and Chelsea haven't actually broken any rules. We are no different from Manchester City we are both process pending potential final verdict/punishment and both cases it's been going on for seasons and in both cases no sanction, as of yet, has been imposed on either club.

Think he'd bury the current version of Joshua before Joshua would land cleanly, This version of Joshua is worried about being hit, which is irc what leads to him getting hit. I think AJ is just best to beat up Jake earn a lot of money and disappear into the sunset with a half decent legacy in tact to be honest.

Wouldn't say the division's been shallow during Whyte's career at all tbh, Joshua, Wlad, Fury, Usyek, Dubois, Parker, Wilder despite his technical limitations..... backed up by a good 5 or 6 who could give the prementioned a good run on their night....Not quite what it was in the 90's or the 70's but certainly a pretty solid era. I do agree he is a far cry from the fighter that beat Parker though, been in one to many ding dongs I think, too many miles on the clock and taken three (well four now) pretty heavy knockout losses. He can lose all the weight he wants he's still warn out and getting on.

I agree with this, people happy with situation or trying to blame the football league/Premier League for picking us up on our failings at PSR level instead acknowledging it's our problem are far more of a problem than those that just want to go to a football game. I think the majority on here do at least get there is a problem though.

In his defense probably richer with more time and far less frustration. I'm not really one for telling people not to go or spend money at the club never mind call them part of the problem for doing so, people can do what they want for me but it's pretty hard to call giving your time and money to Leicester City football Club cutting your nose of to spite your face at the moment. I'd say doing so is probably more accurate.

....I think who is on our board is public readily information mate, and is he is right, especially on Rudkin.

Clay Cross on Tuesday first one of the season.... Hamburg in November hopefully, which will be Bundesliga ground number 4.... well it would be if Hertha sorted themselves out and got back up.

Might not even be that long if he plays like that for the next four months. Wouldn't blame him for going either. Swear he cruyff turned and Megged one of their defenders at one point. Ridiculous for a 16 year old.

If you look closely at enough most clubs will be doing something to avoid breaking rules, if it's legal it's legal. You follow the laws to the letter you'll be alright, Forest for example as you've bought up Palace, exactly the same boat as Palace, got around it, Palace even tried to do what they did but didn't do it in time, Forest play in the Europa League, Palace do not. Similar size clubs no bias on size. It is not having "fingers in pies" it is being a "majority shareholder" What Chelsea have done, letter of the PL's own laws, is legal, Manchester City on the other hand they feel have broken their rules, and they have a hearing in October and have been charged with 115 cases of financial irregularity. And it is interesting you are digging out a team with financial irregularities, for operating for 3 years, successfully, without facing a penalty, when at the time of writing you support a club, that has operated for nearly 3 years with financial irregularities, achieving promotion, so successfully, without as of yet, facing a penalty...... The PL have been after Man City the entire time so lets not pretend they aren't doing anything, these things sit with independent commissions and can take some time. If Manchester City get away with it, it'll be to do with the said independent commission, that has nothing to do with the football structure. I mean the rules are bollocks, like many financial rules in the world they are numerous loop holes and pretty much aren't worth the paper they are wrote on but if you are stupid enough not to navigate them properly (as Chelsea did) you will be charged, like Man City have, like we have. Lets not pretend the clubs size has anything to do with as if this was the case, Manchester City wouldn't have been charged, 115 times. Juventus, another example of a very large club being hit hard when needed. Or member we could go back to the 60's and 70's as you would like where Italian clubs could cheat there way to the European cup without penalty.

Who has steam rolled over the rules. If you are referring to Manchester City they are receiving a verdict in October. Which wont be the end of it as there will be an appeal from which ever side loses.

They're in a far worse position than us that is not arguable can't pay the tea lady on time and are refusing to pay the players travelling expenses.

I'd keep an open mind on it if I were you. As it's a case by case basis it could be anything or nothing at all, the relevant bodies seem to make it up as they go along. 30 is silly talk though that's administration and remaining in administration for a lengthy period of time level deduction. Absolute worst case would be 12 you'd think with the best case being nothing.

I don't think Choudhurry is anything like one of our highest earners tbh, he's been bit part in the PL at best, and signed his new deal while we were in this league.....They were thinking about signing him and the wages didn't seem to be an issue and I don't think we were demanding a massive fee. The reason they didn't sign him is because Wilder left they've bought in Rubben Selles and adopted this ethos of artificially analysed players for less than a million each, I don't think they looked at anyone they had loan last season on a perm basis. It could be finances but I would say that says more about their finances than Choudhurry being unaffordable to most promotion chasing Championship teams. Unless someone knows something I don't.

Some of you laugh but if we get slapped with a hefty points deduction I wouldn't rule it out. I can't see it without one though. You'd of needed to finish in 11th to survive a 12 point deduction last year and I'd say that's far from a guarantee.

Sheffield United are not sensibly ran They've sacked a competent manager, They've shipped out three or four pretty solid players, fetched 22 odd million, and are trying to use AI to replace them for a pittance and that kind of approach is what leads to you getting smashed 4-1 at home by a team you beat 6-0 on aggerate over two legs a few months before. The one good thing about this league is we are not the only team in a mess.

Well yeah we aren't that good, it's all relative. And getting rid of the people I'd have out first, given we've got about 2 weeks, is the priority. I mean it's all irrelevant as the Muppets we have in charge wont do right by the club anyway. It is largely a fruitless task sitting here discussing what is best for the club while we have people with a proven track record of not doing what is right for the club running it.

I mean, keeping the reply short, if he was deemed to do a decent job in the Championship for Sheffield United, and was useful for us last time we went up, how is it ridiculous? I mean this isn't covering the fact he can and has covered numerous positions and he's not exactly the most expensive player on the books. No he's not that good, think some idiot on here called me racist for saying as much, sadly, neither are we in general at the moment. That's the real problem. Right now, he's the kind of player we need to retain, for now at least.