I wasn't accusing you of that, but there have been some other posts in this thread to that effect.
I'm well aware of our ownership history, but like I've tried to say in a roundabout way, "spiv" owners shouldn't be the benchmark by which all football club owners who come above that standard are judged. The minimum standard expected of good owners should be the criteria I set out, which I've acknowledged the Thais have lived up to.
All I've really tried to say is they shouldn't be free from the same scrutiny people give everyone else involved with LCFC, but there seem to be a fair amount who think they should (again, I know that's not your personal standpoint).
As for "would I bring in anyone else?", I'd rather there was a different ownership model entirely for all clubs in England. But I'm a complete idealist, it'll never happen, and it's another debate for another day anyway I reckon.