https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/climate-change/energy-subsidies#:~:text=Back to Top-,Size of Fossil Fuel Subsidies,support from surging energy prices.
IMF has estimated the subsidies to the fossil fuel companies at $7 trillion. Somewhat higher than the amount given to Ukraine (which was money ploughed straight back into the domestic defense industry creating jobs and just putting money back into the US financial system). The fossil fuel industry have done an excellent job of blinding people to the state money they receive via tax breaks and subsidies.
Point I'm making is that even if you don't care about the environment at the expense of your wallet, moving away from fossil fuels is the long term solution as they're cheaper. We've seen the consequences of being hostage to the global energy market rate is following Russia's invasion (wasn't exactly delighted to see my energy bills go from £80p/m to £450 p/m), so the idea of going deeper into hydrocarbons makes no sense financially or environmentally. Wish the former was articulated better to try and convince those who are opposed to de-carbonisation better. It's more idealogical crap being weaponised for vested interests that sadly have a strangle hold on US politics.