Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

st albans fox

Member
  • Posts

    41,727
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by st albans fox

  1. Two days left any rain (might be a bit in the afternoon session) is irrelevant to a result. Will be either series drawn or England 3-1 win
  2. Wycombe paid their players less than 2k in the championship Highest was Vokes who got a bit above 2.5k Problem is his agent won’t accept less than 30k to come here because it’s us
  3. Maybe we could have a different sponsor for each game ?
  4. Visited once in the summer and it peed all day saw a souvenir which said ‘Salzburg in the rain’ figured it was common
  5. Isn’t it always sodden ??
  6. Blackbird road good memories never did work out why my parents were interested and took us down each week old man liked a bet so suppose blackbird road was familiar re the dog track neither at all interested in bikes or stuff like that
  7. He’s a vet
  8. Surely that means something is in the offing - or is it irrelevant - if he isn’t paid then he can tear the deal up.
  9. If they cannot put out a team against us and are subsequently sold, would the game be rearranged for later in the season ?? im not sure other clubs pushing for promotion would be happy about us receiving a 3 point gift based on the fixture schedule.
  10. Agents talking player not involved …….. hypotheticals …..
  11. He’s actually ‘shot’ the messenger
  12. It’s about to rain for up to an hour maybe would have been best to just see out a big chunk of the day rather than swing and get out three days still to go!
  13. Can you imagine England not winning the series based on the position not long after lunch today ??
  14. pretty amazed by this
  15. Ward in goal and coady at CB guaranteed clean sheets against us then !
  16. we’ve discussed this several times won’t happen
  17. Yahya is a new entry in the 2024 boys names maybe we can expect to see adolf or Donald next year ……
  18. I stand corrected - He must have been used differently last season based on those numbers. Previous seasons were nothing like as prolific We can’t afford to sell skipp annd we can’t afford to have expensive players sat around. Unless we have a loan option planned for him.
  19. Just seems a broadly similar player to skipp and winks why do we need another ? (Unless winks is off)
  20. the guilty brother will go down (might only be for a year). Given it is a first offence he may have got away with a community order without the publicity and his not guilty plea. Bloke singular mac one of the brothers isn’t guilty of anything at this time Regarding the red mist policeman - if he’s not been involved in anything similar before then I’d accept it was an ill judged reaction in a highly stressful situation. If he’s got form then he should be disciplined
  21. In this case the judge pointed out to the jury that the two hadn’t been involved with the police previously. He said it was up to them to assess whether that made it less likely that would be guilty. Given that the evidence was on video I found the comments bizarre. I wonder if judges have been told to say things like this to try and bring about not guilty verdicts, given the lack of space in our prisons. Maybe the thoughts of the DOJ is that someone who commits an isolated violent offence isn’t much of a risk and on balance doesn’t need to be put away. Wouldn’t sound like justice to me.
  22. Well one brother has for now - perhaps it was thought a poor strategy if the they had entered different pleas
  23. good assessment as you say, the charges relating to pc stampy are unproven (for now) I would expect that the cps will go for a retrial under pressure from the police and politicians. I think this would be the correct route forward. I also think that the prosecution would find it easier to get a guilty verdict on retrial (especially against the brother already convicted )
  24. Must be getting close to a verdict on the manc airport trial jury unable to be unanimous so asksd to reach 10/2 by the judge the defence was basically self defence as they didn’t realise they were being challenged by police. If they get off then I’m concerned re precedence. Anyone involved in a scuffle can lump a copper and claim they didn’t realise. The videos I saw looked pretty solid for a guilty verdict. Whether one of the policemen needs to be disciplined is another matter. Surely that doesn’t affect the guilt/not of the defendants - isn’t it separate??
×
×
  • Create New...