Muzzy_Izzn’t

Yeah I suppose my original point would make more sense if we’d gone in with the loan + obligation. Completely agree with the above and the fact that the RW role has been lacking, realistically since Mahrez left, and Under was always going to be a bit of a punt considering his history of injuries and lack of playing time.. but surely this had to be considered at length before we brought him in and must be playing a factor in why Under has been used so infrequently so far.

I suppose there is a couple of ways of looking at this though no? Obviously the above being one.. But also could it not be that we are giving him time to come up to speed with the rigour of Premier League football as well.. we’ve tried to nurture him through the first half of the season to make sure he is getting up to fitness and up to the speed of the Premier League, which could be a sign that he is a longer term prospect, rather than an instant quick fix. I’m sure when Fabinho first joined Liverpool he didn’t get a tonne of starts and didn’t have as big an