Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Not going to ever happen, but along with Lisci, Vasco Matos looks superb, got Santa Clara promoted then finished 5th in the top flight and qualified for the Conference League
New contract to not play, no thanks. If Handscomb comes back we have him and Hill also capable of stepping in if Cox gets injured. Weirdly for all the criticism of the club losing money, you seem very happy for us to pay Swindells when he isn't really needed.
I'm replying to the point you made about them being labelled Asian rather than Pakistani, and that actually this article in particular does specify they are Pakistani and doesn't generalise them as Asian.
Aware it has been an issue though where reports have generalised and called them Asian grooming gangs
Not sure if you mean this article in particular or just referencing the story in general but that article states a few times that they were Pakistani men
Guessing we're in favour due to the commercials of it, can't imagine we make much if any money from hosting championship games? I don't agree with it though
This is from the prem website "If your child refuses an offer of retention and a new Club wishes to register your child, the new Club will have to pay money called compensation to your child’s previous Club. It’s also important to know that your child cannot be offered a professional contract until their U16 year or enter into one until they are 17 years old."
So does this mean he could be offered one this year? But it simply doesn't become active until he is 17
I'm only asking why it's a surprise I never specified I expected him to be playing here, if we shift him in a year's time for a couple of million it's a good deal.