Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

bmt

Member
  • Posts

    2,988
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Fan Since
    1992

Recent Profile Visitors

7,376 profile views

bmt's Achievements

Experienced Pro

Experienced Pro (13/14)

  • Fanatic Fox
  • Dedicated
  • Posting Machine
  • Collaborator
  • First Post

Recent Badges

1,731

Reputation

  1. As an aside, how ****ing annoying is GOAT? He's our best ever. Why the stupid acronym?
  2. Back into the abyss
  3. Yeah it should be like the Colossus of Rhodes. Towering over the KP
  4. I think it's the extension that relegation somehow doesn't hurt him very much. If I was him I'd go to the US for a year and make bank
  5. Knew it was coming but devastated. Doubt any Leicester player ever gets close. The greatest ever.
  6. It's very worrying we are so close to PSR thresholds we can't sack him. We are so ****ed next season it's unreal. We won't be able to get rid of any of the wasters because of their book value so we are going to be stuck with a load of crap players we can't get rid of and no headroom to get any new one in. King Power need to go. Also I can see why Ruud is staying for money but we should have barriers letting him know what a twat he is. Worst manager in Premier league history thinks he deserves compensation. A snappy version of that anyway!
  7. This. I think people miss how good Wolves, and to a lesser extent Palace, have been since we were in 16th. Haven't worked the numbers out but I'm sure Wolves wouldn't be far off challenging for Europe if you remove their start. We would have been marginally better off under Cooper imo and that is purely because he was lucky. Having said that I think we would have scored quite a few more. Both horrendous appointments
  8. Wasn't wout faes Liverpools top scorer for a while
  9. Bravo. Hope all goes to plan.
  10. This is wild
  11. Not really my sector but as a long only equity asset manager, with long term investment horizons, I'm not sure we use them. They're more stock specific and investment thesis-driven, but will sell off reactively if the risk of holding a stock goes above the percieved long term benefit. Probably the worst type of asset management in such a circumstance. Will update when I see the next performance figures
  12. Agree with the main point but there will (in my opinion) be long term losses from this to people's pensions, which I can understand, given the nature of how pensions work, pissing people off. When the markets went down there is fiduciary duty of asset owners and asset managers to derisk their portfolios to reduce the amount of the potential future losses they are happy to take. Doing this reduces their capacity to fully realise the upside. I work for an asset manager (with primarily pension fund clients) and while I've not got access to day to day performance I'd be very surprised if any of our funds haven't made a net loss over the past 6 or 7 days.
  13. Maybe you're right but it feels like people do neither. But if 50% of people didn't renew and not many new people wanted the seats it would send a proper message.
  14. I know it's not my place to say but the amount of people on here that have renewed is (imo) pathetic. We need to force change
  15. Honestly one of the weirdest things I've read haha
×
×
  • Create New...