Nationwider Posted 16 September 2005 Posted 16 September 2005 I've been thinking about getting one of these two games for the PS2. Which is better? And which is easier, as I'm sh1t at most PS2 games?!!!
ashwj Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 BL is much, much better! Game rankings gives cricket 2005 an average score (based on several published reviews) of 55.6%. BL gets 73.9%, reviews aren't everything but I find game rankings avg very useful.
Nationwider Posted 17 September 2005 Author Posted 17 September 2005 Thanks peeps. I'm a bit confused now!!! I'll probably rent one or t'other from Blockbuster first.
filbertway Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 I prefered BL , the only prob with brian lara is there is no autoplay.
Hitesh Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Thanks peeps. I'm a bit confused now!!! I'll probably rent one or t'other from Blockbuster first. GET BRIAN LARA Na, just go for the one which you get most enjoyment out of. I can tell you that me and my mates had a multiplayer game the other week and enjoyed it loads! Plus, you get good enjoyment from single player doing a world series!
Libertine Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Lara of course! Do you not realise that EA is satan in disguise?!
Benji Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Lara but if you ever manage to bowl out lara on test level then buy yourself some big medal
Jay Posted 18 September 2005 Posted 18 September 2005 Lara all the way I quite like the way when you play you have a good chance of bowling the other side out for a realistic score, on to many cricket games in the past it takes you ages to bowl a side out and they get a massive score and then you get bowled out for about 40 runs!! everything about Lara is great
Ricey Posted 18 September 2005 Posted 18 September 2005 If anyone wants a good Cricket management game I'd recommend keeping your eyes on Cricket Coach
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.