PompeyFox Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 With a defensive line up like that has anyone got the rant line for monday night phone in. I have just about had enough of this attitude.
TornadoShaunUK Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 bollacks to 4-5-1 <_< its all looking for a another nice defeat today. my prediction.. we lose by 2 goals.. after the game.. Levein rues 'missed chances' and goes on about how unlucky we were and that sooner or later hope our luck will change..
Steven Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 With a defensive line up like that has anyone got the rant line for monday night phone in. I have just about had enough of this attitude. Wait and see what the result is first.
josh Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 I wouldn't mind the 4-5-1 if he had Hume playing in the midfield pushing a bit further forward. Alas this is not the case. Why is Hume not starting?????
Anish Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Why do we have 2 defensive midfielders in the centre? It's bloody pointless!
Wellman Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 As they say on blind date, the choice is yours! WTF!!!!
PompeyFox Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 The missus reckons we are gona win, But you win games by attacking
Louise Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Yeah, but realistically what will happen if we use the link? What will they do. I doubt they will punish the person posting the link or the ones using it, but more likely will shut down this site and perhaps sue Mr C.
Population-1 Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 I must admit to be disappointed Hume isn't starting. If we are playing the 4-5-1 system then we need pace up front and someone who can hold up the ball to bring the likes of Hughes, Momo etc into the game. That is not de Vries' style. Levein has long favoured the big target man mentality however. Personally I think it will be meat and drink for the likes of Lescott and co. Lets hope I am wrong.
Wellman Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 THE BLOKE FROM THE FOXES TRUST WHO'S ON COMMENTARY SITS IN FRONT OF ME AT THE WALKERS!!!!!!!! My claim to fame
Population-1 Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Apologies if this has been asked already, but can anyone provide a link to live match commentary that is actually legal to access without subscription?
Anish Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 There is no 'legal' link to commentary I'm afraid
Anish Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 "Not the biggest away support from the Leicester fans" - that's cos we're bloody annoyed with our away record and our stupidly defensive tactics!
Anish Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Who's the co-commentator? Ian Bason of the Foxes Trust
Durnerz Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 "Not the biggest away support from the Leicester fans" - that's cos we're bloody annoyed with our away record and our stupidly defensive tactics! For me it was the price pretty much and the fact i've already been to Molineux.
Steven Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Who's the co-commentator? Ian Bason from the Foxes Trust.
Wellman Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Who's the co-commentator? The bloke who sits infront of me at walkers
Hazza Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Checked the teams on Sky Sports' online score centre and they've got it set out as 4-4-2 but with Kisnorbo at left back and Dublin up front with de Vries, but that's hardly inspiring either Have they said on commentary whether it's 4-5-1 or 4-4-2?
Little Nicky Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 What a load of crap! Who the hell is seella? his name is Sodding SYLLA! Stupid bloke Wolves 2-0!
Louise Posted 17 September 2005 Posted 17 September 2005 Checked the teams on Sky Sports' online score centre and they've got it set out as 4-4-2 but with Kisnorbo at left back and Dublin up front with de Vries, but that's hardly inspiring either Have they said on commentary whether it's 4-5-1 or 4-4-2? It is 4-5-1
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.