Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Foxin_Mad

Marcus Rashford

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, Foxin_Mad said:

Judging by the way he spoke so naturally on tv I dont think so. To be honest I am astounded to see how he handles in self at 22. Theres a future leader right there in football or elsewhere.

Yep, he comes across very well. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Bert said:

Yep, he comes across very well. 

He seems to be very good at handling stuff. Hancock gets his name wrong he laughs it off whilst the leftist hate mob go after Hancock (who is dyslexic), he gets baited he doesn't rise to it, He keeps focused on this belief his cause and knows he is better for staying out of the gutters and drawn it to futile arguments which achieves little. Absolute credit to himself.

 

I wish I could be as calm as Markus lol

 

Next time he visits the KP he deserves a standing ovation, he does at every stadium. :appl:

Posted
17 minutes ago, David Guiza said:

Bellerin is another example of a top class role model in sport. 

 

Image

No trees planted then :(

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Foxin_Mad said:

He seems to be very good at handling stuff. Hancock gets his name wrong he laughs it off whilst the leftist hate mob go after Hancock (who is dyslexic), he gets baited he doesn't rise to it, He keeps focused on this belief his cause and knows he is better for staying out of the gutters and drawn it to futile arguments which achieves little. Absolute credit to himself.

 

I wish I could be as calm as Markus lol

 

Next time he visits the KP he deserves a standing ovation, he does at every stadium. :appl:

Dyslexic or not... there’s a big difference between Daniel and Marcus lol 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bert said:

Dyslexic or not... there’s a big difference between Daniel and Marcus lol 

There is, but it can in some forms lead to you forgetting names completely, that along with the Radcliffe, Rashford, Daniel, Marcus maybe confusing to a dyslexic. He has had form for it to on his news conferences. 

 

Don't get me wrong, I am not Hancocks biggest fan. To be honest with these guys all I would like to see is a bit of humility, say 'yes we made a mistake, sorry we will learn from it and do better in the future'. I actually don't mind a government making wrong decisions and admitting it and making u-turns if the decision is the right thing to do.  

 

Rashford produced a case that was quite frankly impossible not to support. It will be interesting to see what his next move is. 

Posted
4 hours ago, StanSP said:

 

 

You know when people say "you shouldn't have kids if you can't afford them" they aren't talking about the people that have steady jobs and fall on rough times, people understand that that happens, they are talking about Natalie that has 3 kids already and lives on benefits actively trying for number 4 and then complaining destitution in the sun or some other such shitrag. Or the people that have huge families and then complain the council can't provide them with a mansion. 

 

Defending the people that need defending doesn't mean the people that are genuinely just making shite life choices should be given a free ride with no one calling them out over it. 

Posted
1 hour ago, David Guiza said:

One minor upside when we lose to a dodgy goal late on at the Emirates for the 48th year running! 

This will be the one year we will but with no fans in the stands to witness it.

Posted
On 17/06/2020 at 14:00, Innovindil said:

You know when people say "you shouldn't have kids if you can't afford them" they aren't talking about the people that have steady jobs and fall on rough times, people understand that that happens, they are talking about Natalie that has 3 kids already and lives on benefits actively trying for number 4 and then complaining destitution in the sun or some other such shitrag. Or the people that have huge families and then complain the council can't provide them with a mansion. 

 

Defending the people that need defending doesn't mean the people that are genuinely just making shite life choices should be given a free ride with no one calling them out over it. 

There are undoubtedly people who are dicks.

 

That said especially at the moment there are genuinely good hard working families who have lost half or all their income overnight due to this lockdown cluster****, and I have no doubt there will be many more over the next 6-12 months depending on the recovery. The problem the UK has is we are a service industry country, that isnt going to recover that easily.

 

I'm in manufacturing and so far our demand is very strong, I hope that continues. If we continue like this for 6 months I will need more staff.

 

My view is and always be the support net should be there for those that genuinely need it, it should fully cover all costs and perhaps be equivalent to an average wage for an emergency period available instantly not after 6 weeks. Perhaps after 2 months it should reduce down or the person has (if fit and able) the option remain on full amount if they do work in the community (litter pick, gritting, grass cutting (all the stuff councils cant be arsed with). That way we all benefit, it gives local people a genuine connection to their area.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...