Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Mark

Match Ratings: Chelsea 4-2 Leicester City - Vote Now

Chelsea 4-2 Leicester City

You do not have permission to vote. Please login to vote.
  1. 5.7

    Total Average Rating

    120 votes
  2. Highest Rated Player

    Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall 7.5
  3. Lowest Rated Player

    Wout Faes 4.8
  4. Manager Confidence 91% +1%

Recommended Posts

Season: 2023/24
Voting Starts: 17/03/24
Voting Ends: 22/03/24

  1. Jakub Stolarczyk
  2. Hamza Choudhury
  3. Wout Faes
  4. Jannik Vestergaard
  5. Callum Doyle
  6. Wilfred Ndidi
  7. Harry Winks
  8. Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall
  9. Abdul Fatawu
  10. Patson Daka
  11. Stephy Mavididi
  12. Yunus Akgün (sub)
  13. James Justin (sub)
  14. Conor Coady (sub)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This vote will be interesting.

 

IMHO:

 

Jakub and KDH very good.

 

Vesty, Faes, Doyle, Fatawu, Daka struggled.

 

Justin probably gonna get panned for his brief appearance.

 

Mavididi not penetrative very often but that goal adds 2 or 3 to his score.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stolarczyk 8 Some really good saves that might have been underestimated at the time (low to the ground and he got down well)

 

Hamza 5 In his defence, this inverted full back position is totally alien to him. He can’t do it. Looked slow and almost disinterested 

 

Faes 4 Been off it for a while. Coady please 

 

Vestergaard 6 Made some decent interceptions but his lack of pace is embarrassing. We just cannot pick him next season if we get up 

 

Doyle 6 Lack of pace was a problem 

 

Winks 6 Looks  weak when up against physical midfielders like Caeceido. Wasn’t able to get on the ball as normal so just looked a bit lightweight and lost 

 

KDH 9 Imperious. That performance puts him in the shop window unfortunately once again. Don’t think we’ll keep him. MOTM 

 

Fatawu 5 Occasion maybe too big for him but he’ll be back

 

Ndidi 6 Looked disinterested like Hamza did 

 

Mavididi 7 Extra point for the goal. Superb and hopefully a confidence booster for him 

 

Daka 5 How he stayed on for 90 is beyond me. No threat yesterday 

Edited by Dickov22
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dickov22 said:

Stolarczyk 8 Some really good saves that might have been underestimated at the time (low to the ground and he got down well)

 

Hamza 5 In his defence, this inverted full back position is totally alien to him. He can’t do it. Looked slow and almost disinterested 

 

Faes 4 Been off it for a while. Coady please 

 

Vestergaard 6 Made some decent interceptions but his lack of pace is embarrassing. We just cannot pick him next season if we get up 

 

Doyle 6 Lack of pace was a problem 

 

Winks 6 Looks  weak when up against physical midfielders like Caeceido. Wasn’t able to get on the ball as normal so just looked a bit lightweight and lost 

 

KDH 9 Imperious. That performance puts him in the shop window unfortunately once again. Don’t think we’ll keep him. MOTM 

 

Fatawu 5 Occasion maybe too big for him but he’ll be back

 

Ndidi 6 Looked disinterested like Hamza did 

 

Mavididi 7 Extra point for the goal. Superb and hopefully a confidence booster for him 

 

Daka 5 How he stayed on for 90 is beyond me. No threat yesterday 

Winks is slow as well. Once he gets turned the attacker is away, even at Championship level. The calls for him to play for England on here were embarrassing. 

 

Agree with your ratings and comments though.

Edited by Fox92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

Winks is slow as well. Once he gets turned the attacker is away, even at Championship level. The calls for him to play for England on here were embarrassing. 

 

Agree with your ratings and comments though.

Maybe I’ve been a bit harsh on Daka. It was his pressure that led to the own goal.

 

Agree on Winks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...