Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
BrilliantFox

Vardy vs the Ownership

By BrilliantFox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

BrilliantFox

BrilliantFox

Posted
Posted

If there is anything that will unite the fanbase to take action against the board it would be Vardy saying it publicly.

 

Do you think Vardy one day will sit down with Sky or TNT to highlight the problems at the club? We know for a fact Vardy knows all the issues upstairs.

Lloyd90

Lloyd90

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said:

If there is anything that will unite the fanbase to take action against the board it would be Vardy saying it publicly.

 

Do you think Vardy one day will sit down with Sky or TNT to highlight the problems at the club? We know for a fact Vardy knows all the issues upstairs.

When they have paid him Millions and millions of pounds ? Jeeze. I’ve heard it all now.

  • Like 2
BrilliantFox

BrilliantFox

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

Why would he want to get involved?

If there was any player you could attribute to the label "Mr. Leicester City" it would be him.

 

He loves the club dearly and so do his children, he isn't someone to shy away from the truth either.

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BrilliantFox said:

If there was any player you could attribute to the label "Mr. Leicester City" it would be him.

 

He loves the club dearly and so do his children, he isn't someone to shy away from the truth either.

Fan favourite sure, but he also isn’t about to burn those bridges. This is a now issue, nothing to do with Jamie, we need to live through this, not him.

  • Like 1
BrilliantFox

BrilliantFox

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Lloyd90 said:

When they have paid him Millions and millions of pounds ? Jeeze. I’ve heard it all now.

He's under no current financial contract or obligation with the club now. He's a Cremonese player. 

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BrilliantFox said:

He's under no current financial contract or obligation with the club now. He's a Cremonese player. 

This is a very small industry so pissing in any pool causes ripples. So no, I do not believe he ever will.

  • Like 1
Old Fox

Old Fox

Posted
Posted
Just now, BrilliantFox said:

He's under no current financial contract or obligation with the club now. He's a Cremonese player. 

Absolutely and like lots of the 2016 heroes many must be looking at what’s going on and be saddened by the mess we are in.

 

The lack of any of that era apart from Kingy being connected to us is shambolic - be it in coaching, scouting or even bloody PR says it all really.

 

if you see or hear the likes of Albrighton you can tell it’s a shambles but it’s just bloody sad !

  • Like 1
Chelmofox

Chelmofox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said:

He's under no current financial contract or obligation with the club now. He's a Cremonese player. 

What's in it for him then? Unless there is a story that pays in top wedge then i strongy doubt it. I doubt any media is paying big for a story about Leicesters ownership right now.

 

And ive always felt he held the ownership in pretty good regard.

  • Like 1
BrilliantFox

BrilliantFox

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

And ive always felt he held the ownership in pretty good regard.

 

3 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

I bet he fully loves the ownership.

2 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Of course he does, it’s positively weird to think he wouldn’t.

 

Im sure he is well aware to differentiate Vichai from Top. 

 

Top being a beneficiary of everything Vichai created, then going on to destroy his father's legacy.

Edited by BrilliantFox
jayfox26

jayfox26

Posted
Posted

If Vardy knows about dodgy stuff etc then the only way it comes out would be when he's retired and needs some more money so does a book.

 

By which point either Top will be gone or the club will be gone so it will be null and void.

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BrilliantFox said:

 

 

Im sure he is well aware to differentiate Vichai from Top. 

 

Top being a beneficiary of everything Vichai created, then going on to destroy his father's legacy.

Jamie and the players were clearly part of those good times, along with Vichai and Top, and as much as we love to separate them in our mind as fans, Vichi and Top, it’s a bit silly really, as slamming Top will inherently diminish the family, and I doubt anyone from those times wishes to do this.

Lloyd90

Lloyd90

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said:

 

 

Im sure he is well aware to differentiate Vichai from Top. 

 

Top being a beneficiary of everything Vichai created, then going on to destroy his father's legacy.

Mate we finished 12th and then 9th the seasons after winning the league when he was alive…

we then finished 9th, 5th and 5th when he wasn’t alive and won an FA cup.

nothing lasts forever, it is cycles….

we will be back one day.

  • Like 1
Lloyd90

Lloyd90

Posted
Posted
Just now, BrilliantFox said:

Top has singlehandedly allowed Aston Villa to replace us.

And you think they will stay there forever? Or as I suggested by cycles, in the next 2 or 3 years they will be in decline. 

  • Like 1
OnlyOneCity

OnlyOneCity

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Jamie and the players were clearly part of those good times, along with Vichai and Top, and as much as we love to separate them in our mind as fans, Vichi and Top, it’s a bit silly really, as slamming Top will inherently diminish the family, and I doubt anyone from those times wishes to do this.

This exactly. We’ve gone from telling other fans that they should be boycotting matches, by fans who don’t attend anyway, to telling our Goat, who he should and shouldn’t be friends with. We have a worrying number of control freaks on here.

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, BrilliantFox said:

Top has singlehandedly allowed Aston Villa to replace us.

Pretty sure Emery and the Villa board had a little something to do with it.

  • Like 1
BrilliantFox

BrilliantFox

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Dahnsouff said:

Pretty sure Emery and the Villa board had a little something to do with it.

Emery was available, but we clung onto Rodgers and they sacked Gerrard. 

 

Thats the difference, our hierarchy are passive.

Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
Just now, BrilliantFox said:

Emery was available, but we clung onto Rodgers and they sacked Gerrard. 

 

Thats the difference, our hierarchy are passive.

Hindsight judgements are not in any way valuable you know. It’s the easiest thing in the world to be right after the fact.

J. James

J. James

Posted
Posted

It's the fan base needs to take action not a former player no matter how he may or may not feel, the owners of clubs he may want to go to wouldn't touch any player who goes against one of their own.

It's our club,our team being trashed, but if the majority are not bothered - as they clearly aren't - why should he be?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...