fox123 Posted 31 January 2006 Author Posted 31 January 2006 thought it was thankyou *thumbs up* no problem
fox123 Posted 31 January 2006 Author Posted 31 January 2006 What could we have got for 2-3 fox123? 66/1
fox123 Posted 31 January 2006 Author Posted 31 January 2006 Would have been nice whats even nicer is scorecast double price, leicester to win 3-2 and hughes last goalscorer was 675/1
lookwhaticando Posted 31 January 2006 Posted 31 January 2006 Be interesting to see if the odds change on Kelly tomorrow.
fox123 Posted 31 January 2006 Author Posted 31 January 2006 Be interesting to see if the odds change on Kelly tomorrow. i dont think the 9/2 will change to be honest, cotterill's still odds on
Lester LXXIV Posted 1 February 2006 Posted 1 February 2006 i dont think the 9/2 will change to be honest, cotterill's still odds on Is he still 9/2 after the interviews he has given in the last 24 hrs?
fox123 Posted 1 February 2006 Author Posted 1 February 2006 Is he still 9/2 after the interviews he has given in the last 24 hrs? no movement due to us not taking any money/ enquiries on him
filbertway Posted 1 February 2006 Posted 1 February 2006 no movement due to us not taking any money/ enquiries on him Who do you represent? Or can't you say
fox123 Posted 1 February 2006 Author Posted 1 February 2006 Who do you represent? Or can't you say all ill say is i was quoted in the mercury when the odds were published last thursday
filbertway Posted 1 February 2006 Posted 1 February 2006 all ill say is i was quoted in the mercury when the odds were published last thursday If you worked for a company surely you would want to advertise yourself, suppose i'll have to look for the article now
fox123 Posted 1 February 2006 Author Posted 1 February 2006 If you worked for a company surely you would want to advertise yourself, suppose i'll have to look for the article now not neceseraly, you have to remember punters wanna sting bookmakers, so for example i put steve cotteril up at 12/1 as he was last thursday, we could get phone calls saying oh i see you have odds on internet at 12/1 is that price still available, id look stupid if it wasnt having posted something 2 minutes before. I have put odds that we have on this board to keep readers upto date as to where the bookmakers are as far as betting is concerned.
filbertway Posted 1 February 2006 Posted 1 February 2006 not neceseraly, you have to remember punters wanna sting bookmakers, so for example i put steve cotteril up at 12/1 as he was last thursday, we could get phone calls saying oh i see you have odds on internet at 12/1 is that price still available, id look stupid if it wasnt having posted something 2 minutes before. I have put odds that we have on this board to keep readers upto date as to where the bookmakers are as far as betting is concerned. oh ok , that's fair enough I'm determined to find out now though
fox123 Posted 1 February 2006 Author Posted 1 February 2006 oh ok , that's fair enough I'm determined to find out now though its not that dificult, to arrow it down for you, we dont have any betting shops only a credit betting call centre
Ric Flair Posted 2 February 2006 Posted 2 February 2006 11/2 Surely with the news in The Sun this morning you should stop taking bets on Newell? If it is Newell I bet you'll be laughing. Made a right earner from the Cotterill stakes!
fox123 Posted 2 February 2006 Author Posted 2 February 2006 Surely with the news in The Sun this morning you should stop taking bets on Newell? If it is Newell I bet you'll be laughing. Made a right earner from the Cotterill stakes! Havent taken a bean on Newell, maybe the punters being cautious from what the sun print after what they printed about cotterill and lumped large ammounts on
IDEA OR IKEA Posted 2 February 2006 Posted 2 February 2006 Havent taken a bean on Newell, maybe the punters being cautious from what the sun print after what they printed about cotterill and lumped large ammounts on Newell is in now surely im going to back a k on it
fox123 Posted 2 February 2006 Author Posted 2 February 2006 Newell is in now surely im going to back a k on it Wasn't that said about cotterill??
Ric Flair Posted 2 February 2006 Posted 2 February 2006 Wasn't that said about cotterill?? Very true, but don't bookies cover have a safe than sorry tactic when it comes to managerial bettings? Surely you wouldn't want someone to lob £5000 on Newell and him to become boss at 11/2 when it's been stated in the papers that he's well up for it.
fox123 Posted 2 February 2006 Author Posted 2 February 2006 Very true, but don't bookies cover have a safe than sorry tactic when it comes to managerial bettings? Surely you wouldn't want someone to lob £5000 on Newell and him to become boss at 11/2 when it's been stated in the papers that he's well up for it. We also have to balance our books, after takign a load on cotterill, taking some on newell would balance it out....i also have the advantage of 'hedging' some of the bets off if i feel i need to, at a slightly larger price.
Ric Flair Posted 2 February 2006 Posted 2 February 2006 We also have to balance our books, after takign a load on cotterill, taking some on newell would balance it out....i also have the advantage of 'hedging' some of the bets off if i feel i need to, at a slightly larger price. Does that mean for example if it looked likely Cotterill was going to be appointed and you were looking at a big loss, you would stick aload of cash on Cotterill yourselves at another bookmakers? I've heard that happens regularly with small independant bookmakers.
fox123 Posted 2 February 2006 Author Posted 2 February 2006 Does that mean for example if it looked likely Cotterill was going to be appointed and you were looking at a big loss, you would stick aload of cash on Cotterill yourselves at another bookmakers? I've heard that happens regularly with small independant bookmakers. Yea we have another bookie that would help us out if needed, we scratch their back, they scratch ours etc.... Big bookies hedge to, usually on course or on the exchanges, thats how prices shorten.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.