Player Ratings vs Plymouth

[Guest]

Taylor 7

Makin 5

Stewart 5.5

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 8

Morris 6.5

Gemmill 6

Nalis 7

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 6

Subs:

Williams 7.5

Blake 6

[Benji]

Taylor 8 - game winning save at the end and i prefer him punching thank you! better than not making a catch or staying on your goal-line

Makin 5

Stewart 7

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Morris 4

Gemmill 6

Nalis 6

Connolly 5

Scowcroft 6

Subs:

Williams 7

Blake 6

[Sparky]

taylor 8

makin 5

dublin 6

dabizas 6

stewart 7

morris 5

nalis 5

gemmill 6

gillespie 7

scowcroft 7

connolly 4

williams 7*

blake 5

[Smiley Tom]

Taylor 7 - Had a good game. Great save at the end but largely redundant for the rest. Nothing he could do about the goal.

Makin 6 - Very poor first half but redeemed himself somewhat with assist for 2nd goal. Would still prefer Canero.

Dabizas 5 - Dodgy in the air, commits too many fouls and gives away the ball too often. Please pick anyone but him. At least he makes good recovery tackles after he has made a mistake.

Dublin 7 - Good in the air at the back, and a good goal. Led the team quite well though still not my first choice at the back.

Stewart 8 - Another good performance. Is becoming more consistant now. Supported forward well and solid defensively.

Gillespie 8 - Played very well. Took on players, put in a few good crosses and got back to defend. Perhaps his best game.

Nalis 7 - Another solid performance. Looked good on the ball and got forward when he could. Good crosses when switched to the left.

Gemmill 6 - Still not convinced by him. Seems slow to get things going and gave the ball away stupidly sometimes.

Morris 5 - Looked off the pace and struggled to get involved. Hints of skill at times but didn't come to collect the ball or help defend much.

Scowy 7 - Scored a good header but perhaps should have had another. Good at bringing the ball down but still struggled at times.

Connolly 5 - Is starting to worry me that he just can't seem to score. Drifts too deep and lacks control at critical times. Why does he take throw-ins, Dickov would never have done?

Subs:

Williams 7 - Did well after coming on. Started creating forward emphasis and supported up front well. Brave header just before the end.

Blake 5 - All he seemed to do was get booked and shout at Scowy.

[Little Nicky]

Taylor 7.5 - Looked commanding in his area and punched superbly

Makin 6 - Not much to shout about apart for the cross for Dublin's header

Dabizas 4 - Levein must be seeing a different player to me to keep selecting this guy, he's a joke!

Dublin 7 - Finally gave a performance, even if it was mostly constrained to the second half, much better at the back than up front!

Stewart 7 - Looked pretty good going forward, still don't think he's a left back, should be left mid IMO but, thats a position we're short of players for since Tiatto rejects it also!

Gillespie 5.5 - People seem to be forgetting the first half where he couldn't seem to keep his foot on the ball! Improved vastly in the second half however, definately a confidence player, I don't think he'll get a look in when canero can finally prove himself worthy of a place (what went wrong there, bring back Canero!)

Nalis 6 - Not one of his best performances, didn't look comfortable on the ball, can't knock him though, he's been one of the most consistent players this season!

Gemmill 8 - Great performance, totally justified his 3 month contract extention, looked pacey and eager to win the ball.

Morris 4 - I was surprised about him, he never really seemed to be at the races, may have blown his chance of a run in the team!

Scowcroft 7 - Great diving header for the goal, but all in all his performance wasn't top draw, won a few headers, but I would like to see him commanding the frontline a bit more.

Connolly 5 - My confidence is dwindling with conners, I've stuck by him so far but if he doesn't start showing some sign that he is actually a centre forward then I'm afraid it's time to warm the bench and give someone else a shot!

Subs:

Williams 8* - Cracking performance, changed the game IMO. Played the holding role in the centre of the park like muzzy used to, if he can keep it up and break into the team again then he could be the answer to our problems!

Blake 6 - Looked good which surprised me when he came on, looks eager to play!

[Ric Flair]

Well it was certainly a game of two halves. The first half we were so shocking myself and my dad were considering going home. Pleased to see we are finally capable of fighting back when were 1-0 down and on a saturday!!

Taylor 7 - Didn't have alot to do until the last few minutes. Solid enough, I hope those punches were only a desperate measure though as they make me nervous.

Makin 3 - One shocker of a game he had. His rating would be lower but his cross for Dublin's goal is worthy of a higher rating. Everything else about him was lacklustre, why Canero was dropped for him is beyond me. Is he injured? Makin will be if I ever meet him, twat. Out now.

Dabizas 6 - A quiet game for Nikos, which is always good news. First half he made a few mistakes, but second half I didn't notice him which means he's had a sound game usually.

Dublin 6 - First half awful, some karate kick volley's which were wild and obscene. Second half, good finish and did his job in the dying stages.

Stewart 7 - Solid game from Jordan, first half was average but second he did well. Got forward well and he's finally looking like a player we can be proud of.

Nalis 6 - Not his best game for us, but still he was busy. The problem with having 2 central midfielders over the age of 32 is that there's not much vibrancy. Nalis is head and shoulders above our other old boys though and he was unlucky not to score.

Gemmill 6 - To give credit where credits due I thought Gemmill had his best game for us, which isn't that hard though considering his previous performances. He irritates me though as he doesn't offer us anything that our other midfielders do, pointless signing but steady game none the less.

Gillespie 7 - Did really well to get that cross in for Scowy's goal, his crossing is getting better as is his all round game play. Impressed

Scowcroft 6 - Terrible first half, he was atrocious. He isn't as influential now he's moved back upfront, but then again he was a nuisance in midfield aswell. Second half he improved, great goal. Other than his goal though he didn't do much and his tackling was bad at times. I think he'll get better though.

Connolly 5 - I feel sorry for the chap, I really do. When's this goal scoring streak going to happen? Never? I'm unsure, he didn't really get a sniff on saturday. The thing is our other strikers aren't any better than Connolly.

Subs:

Williams 9* - ****ing shit hot. Amazing display, he changed the match. He was buzzing, he's a proper footballer. He gave the midfield that lift it needed, his age helps. Looking forward to seeing more of that, he even got stuck in at the end. Well done Gaz.

Blake 6 - Looks more lively, still not convinced by him though. Good finish for the disallowed goal though, handy to have on the bench.

[Craig]

Taylor 8

Makin 5

Stewart 7

Dabizas 6

Dublin 6

Gillespie 8

Morris 3

Gemmill 5

Nalis 6

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 6

Subs:

Williams 7.5

Blake 6

[Macca4lcfc]

Taylor 7

Makin 2

Stewart 6.5

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Morris 4.5

Gemmill 5

Nalis 2

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 7.5

Subs:

Williams 7

Blake 5

[Stuliasz]

Hi guys, any more votes really will count! There is less than 0.1 between the top four players so keep your votes coming in because you will make a difference!

[Ric Flair]

Taylor 7

Makin 2

Stewart 6.5

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Morris 4.5

Gemmill 5

Nalis 2

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 7.5

Subs:

Williams 7

Blake 5

41151[/snapback]

Scowy man of the match??!! Interesting

[Southern Fox]

Taylor 7

Makin 6

Stewart 7

Dabizas 6

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Gemmil 7

Nalis 6

Morris

Scowcoft 6

Connolly 6

Williams 7 MOM

Blake 5

[Ash]

In the Sun today i saw what there rated our players

Gemmill - 8

[Stuliasz]

Can I just get an opinion, how much of the month do people think that a player should have played to be considered for player of the month? Up until now I have used 40% as a mark, but in the context of this month that is someone who has played two games of the five.

When thinking about it this way, this doesn't seem like enough somehow. What do people think? Should I continue to use 40% or perhaps increase this slightly?

[shen]

Can I just get an opinion, how much of the month do people think that a player should have played to be considered for player of the month? Up until now I have used 40% as a mark, but in the context of this month that is someone who has played two games of the five.

When thinking about it this way, this doesn't seem like enough somehow. What do people think? Should I continue to use 40% or perhaps increase this slightly?

41245[/snapback]

50% at least IMO...so in this case at least 3 appearances this month

[Stuliasz]

I think 50% is probably a good option means in months with 4 games they need to have played two, in 6 game months they need to have played 3 and in 5 game months more than 2. Yeh I'll go for 50.

[davieG]

I think 50% is probably a good option means in months with 4 games they need to have played two, in 6 game months they need to have played 3 and in 5 game months more than 2. Yeh I'll go for 50.

41249[/snapback]

Or you could go for a more simple option of 50% if you've been dropped and 40% if your'e out through injury

[MON]

I think 50% is probably a good option means in months with 4 games they need to have played two, in 6 game months they need to have played 3 and in 5 game months more than 2. Yeh I'll go for 50.

41249[/snapback]

Or you could go for a more simple option of 50% if you've been dropped and 40% if your'e out through injury

41263[/snapback]

the club dont give that info

look at canero

[Anish]

Well it was certainly a game of two halves. The first half we were so shocking myself and my dad were considering going home. Pleased to see we are finally capable of fighting back when were 1-0 down and on a saturday!! 

Taylor 7 - Didn't have alot to do until the last few minutes. Solid enough, I hope those punches were only a desperate measure though as they make me nervous.

Makin 3 - One shocker of a game he had. His rating would be lower but his cross for Dublin's goal is worthy of a higher rating. Everything else about him was lacklustre, why Canero was dropped for him is beyond me. Is he injured? Makin will be if I ever meet him, twat. Out now.

Dabizas 6 - A quiet game for Nikos, which is always good news. First half he made a few mistakes, but second half I didn't notice him which means he's had a sound game usually.

Dublin 6 - First half awful, some karate kick volley's which were wild and obscene. Second half, good finish and did his job in the dying stages.

Stewart 7 - Solid game from Jordan, first half was average but second he did well. Got forward well and he's finally looking like a player we can be proud of.

Nalis 6 - Not his best game for us, but still he was busy. The problem with having 2 central midfielders over the age of 32 is that there's not much vibrancy. Nalis is head and shoulders above our other old boys though and he was unlucky not to score.

Gemmill 6 - To give credit where credits due I thought Gemmill had his best game for us, which isn't that hard though considering his previous performances. He irritates me though as he doesn't offer us anything that our other midfielders do, pointless signing but steady game none the less.

Gillespie 7 - Did really well to get that cross in for Scowy's goal, his crossing is getting better as is his all round game play. Impressed

Scowcroft 6 - Terrible first half, he was atrocious. He isn't as influential now he's moved back upfront, but then again he was a nuisance in midfield aswell. Second half he improved, great goal. Other than his goal though he didn't do much and his tackling was bad at times. I think he'll get better though.

Connolly 5 - I feel sorry for the chap, I really do. When's this goal scoring streak going to happen? Never? I'm unsure, he didn't really get a sniff on saturday. The thing is our other strikers aren't any better than Connolly.

Subs:

Williams 9* - ****ing shit hot. Amazing display, he changed the match. He was buzzing, he's a proper footballer. He gave the midfield that lift it needed, his age helps. Looking forward to seeing more of that, he even got stuck in at the end. Well done Gaz.

Blake 6 - Looks more lively, still not convinced by him though. Good finish for the disallowed goal though, handy to have on the bench.

41142[/snapback]

Hoof - you completely omitted Morris! Was he really invisible?

Taylor 7

Makin 2

Stewart 6.5

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Morris 4.5

Gemmill 5

Nalis 2

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 7.5

Subs:

Williams 7

Blake 5

41151[/snapback]

Give Nalis a break - he wasn't our joint worst player

[Macca4lcfc]

Well it was certainly a game of two halves. The first half we were so shocking myself and my dad were considering going home. Pleased to see we are finally capable of fighting back when were 1-0 down and on a saturday!! 

Taylor 7 - Didn't have alot to do until the last few minutes. Solid enough, I hope those punches were only a desperate measure though as they make me nervous.

Makin 3 - One shocker of a game he had. His rating would be lower but his cross for Dublin's goal is worthy of a higher rating. Everything else about him was lacklustre, why Canero was dropped for him is beyond me. Is he injured? Makin will be if I ever meet him, twat. Out now.

Dabizas 6 - A quiet game for Nikos, which is always good news. First half he made a few mistakes, but second half I didn't notice him which means he's had a sound game usually.

Dublin 6 - First half awful, some karate kick volley's which were wild and obscene. Second half, good finish and did his job in the dying stages.

Stewart 7 - Solid game from Jordan, first half was average but second he did well. Got forward well and he's finally looking like a player we can be proud of.

Nalis 6 - Not his best game for us, but still he was busy. The problem with having 2 central midfielders over the age of 32 is that there's not much vibrancy. Nalis is head and shoulders above our other old boys though and he was unlucky not to score.

Gemmill 6 - To give credit where credits due I thought Gemmill had his best game for us, which isn't that hard though considering his previous performances. He irritates me though as he doesn't offer us anything that our other midfielders do, pointless signing but steady game none the less.

Gillespie 7 - Did really well to get that cross in for Scowy's goal, his crossing is getting better as is his all round game play. Impressed

Scowcroft 6 - Terrible first half, he was atrocious. He isn't as influential now he's moved back upfront, but then again he was a nuisance in midfield aswell. Second half he improved, great goal. Other than his goal though he didn't do much and his tackling was bad at times. I think he'll get better though.

Connolly 5 - I feel sorry for the chap, I really do. When's this goal scoring streak going to happen? Never? I'm unsure, he didn't really get a sniff on saturday. The thing is our other strikers aren't any better than Connolly.

Subs:

Williams 9* - ****ing shit hot. Amazing display, he changed the match. He was buzzing, he's a proper footballer. He gave the midfield that lift it needed, his age helps. Looking forward to seeing more of that, he even got stuck in at the end. Well done Gaz.

Blake 6 - Looks more lively, still not convinced by him though. Good finish for the disallowed goal though, handy to have on the bench.

41142[/snapback]

Hoof - you completely omitted Morris! Was he really invisible?

Taylor 7

Makin 2

Stewart 6.5

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Morris 4.5

Gemmill 5

Nalis 2

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 7.5

Subs:

Williams 7

Blake 5

41151[/snapback]

Give Nalis a break - he wasn't our joint worst player

41341[/snapback]

firstly hoof, williams 9? shit hot? he played 45 minutes for god sake, how can you give him 9? he didnt completely change the game, but he was god. I gve nalis a 2 probably a bit hrshly, but i dint think he did anyting at all. he madea few normal psses but apart rom that you wouldnt hve even known he played. h was non existent for most of the game. id gve nalis about the same as morris to be fair, crap ratings there. And the reason i gave scowy man of the mtc was because i thort he was consistent , gillespie was good 40 about 75% and williams wasnt on for long enough to get motm, and scowy didntput a foot wrong. tell me why you think he shouldnt get it?

[Mark]

Scowcroft hardly had the ball to put a foot wrong Macca, he is consistant alright, at being non existant. One of his worst games this season, well if he hadnt of scored, that just put his poor performance rating up slightly.

[Ric Flair]

Well it was certainly a game of two halves. The first half we were so shocking myself and my dad were considering going home. Pleased to see we are finally capable of fighting back when were 1-0 down and on a saturday!! 

Taylor 7 - Didn't have alot to do until the last few minutes. Solid enough, I hope those punches were only a desperate measure though as they make me nervous.

Makin 3 - One shocker of a game he had. His rating would be lower but his cross for Dublin's goal is worthy of a higher rating. Everything else about him was lacklustre, why Canero was dropped for him is beyond me. Is he injured? Makin will be if I ever meet him, twat. Out now.

Dabizas 6 - A quiet game for Nikos, which is always good news. First half he made a few mistakes, but second half I didn't notice him which means he's had a sound game usually.

Dublin 6 - First half awful, some karate kick volley's which were wild and obscene. Second half, good finish and did his job in the dying stages.

Stewart 7 - Solid game from Jordan, first half was average but second he did well. Got forward well and he's finally looking like a player we can be proud of.

Nalis 6 - Not his best game for us, but still he was busy. The problem with having 2 central midfielders over the age of 32 is that there's not much vibrancy. Nalis is head and shoulders above our other old boys though and he was unlucky not to score.

Gemmill 6 - To give credit where credits due I thought Gemmill had his best game for us, which isn't that hard though considering his previous performances. He irritates me though as he doesn't offer us anything that our other midfielders do, pointless signing but steady game none the less.

Gillespie 7 - Did really well to get that cross in for Scowy's goal, his crossing is getting better as is his all round game play. Impressed

Scowcroft 6 - Terrible first half, he was atrocious. He isn't as influential now he's moved back upfront, but then again he was a nuisance in midfield aswell. Second half he improved, great goal. Other than his goal though he didn't do much and his tackling was bad at times. I think he'll get better though.

Connolly 5 - I feel sorry for the chap, I really do. When's this goal scoring streak going to happen? Never? I'm unsure, he didn't really get a sniff on saturday. The thing is our other strikers aren't any better than Connolly.

Subs:

Williams 9* - ****ing shit hot. Amazing display, he changed the match. He was buzzing, he's a proper footballer. He gave the midfield that lift it needed, his age helps. Looking forward to seeing more of that, he even got stuck in at the end. Well done Gaz.

Blake 6 - Looks more lively, still not convinced by him though. Good finish for the disallowed goal though, handy to have on the bench.

41142[/snapback]

Hoof - you completely omitted Morris! Was he really invisible?

Taylor 7

Makin 2

Stewart 6.5

Dabizas 5

Dublin 6

Gillespie 7

Morris 4.5

Gemmill 5

Nalis 2

Connolly 6

Scowcroft 7.5

Subs:

Williams 7

Blake 5

41151[/snapback]

Give Nalis a break - he wasn't our joint worst player

41341[/snapback]

firstly hoof, williams 9? shit hot? he played 45 minutes for god sake, how can you give him 9? he didnt completely change the game, but he was god. I gve nalis a 2 probably a bit hrshly, but i dint think he did anyting at all. he madea few normal psses but apart rom that you wouldnt hve even known he played. h was non existent for most of the game. id gve nalis about the same as morris to be fair, crap ratings there. And the reason i gave scowy man of the mtc was because i thort he was consistent , gillespie was good 40 about 75% and williams wasnt on for long enough to get motm, and scowy didntput a foot wrong. tell me why you think he shouldnt get it?

41416[/snapback]

I'm sorry but is that the worst bit of typing anyone has ever done accidently? Macca old buddy, old pal you might well be a talented footballer but your typing is horrific

Just because someone only plays 45 minutes doesn't mean he can't get a 9. If we went on your basis the player who played the longest would get the highest rating. We were shite first half and second half we were alot better, Williams had a near perfect game hence the 9.

As for Morris, words fail me that's why I left him out.