Head Honcho Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Maybe not the right time to be pointing the finger but wtf were the parents doing leaving a baby with a couple of Rottweilers? RIP little un
Sparky Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 incident happened on stevenson drive new parks
lookwhaticando Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Maybe not the right time to be pointing the finger but wtf were the parents doing leaving a baby with a couple of Rottwielers? RIP little un Going out getting drunk probably, being responsible parents and all. R.I.P kid.
Milky Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 that may not have been the case. When i was very young i was standing just outside my front door when one of the rottweilers from down the road came from nowhere and jump up at me to attack but my mum was just inside the door so i was rescued.
Head Honcho Posted 24 September 2006 Author Posted 24 September 2006 that may not have been the case. When i was very young i was standing just outside my front door when one of the rottweilers from down the road came from nowhere and jump up at me to attack but my mum was just inside the door so i was rescued. Link http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3807807a12,00.html
cisono Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Maybe not the right time to be pointing the finger but wtf were the parents doing leaving a baby with a couple of Rottweilers? RIP little un We had 2 such cases in one week in Italy while I was there on holiday...
Head Honcho Posted 24 September 2006 Author Posted 24 September 2006 The dogs have been trained as guard dogs and the parents exposed their baby to the dogs They need locking up! Now the dogs will be put down no doubt Things like this really do my nut in!
Head Honcho Posted 24 September 2006 Author Posted 24 September 2006 kill the dogs! not safe around humans. Your statement is correct but in a controlled environment the dogs are harmless! Why were they not muzzled?
lookwhaticando Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Your statement is correct but in a controlled environment the dogs are harmless! Why were they not muzzled? Because the parents in question are, in fact, nutjobs.
Bert Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Not far from me, heard different stories about this but i'm not going to say as they may not be true, and this is a very distressing time. R.I.P.
stez Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 nice to see you all (well some) waiting til the full facts have come out before you start condemning the parents
lookwhaticando Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 nice to see you all (well some) waiting til the full facts have come out before you start condemning the parents I don't get East Midlands Today - so I'm never going to be fully enlightened, sadly.
stez Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 I don't get East Midlands Today - so I'm never going to be fully enlightened, sadly. but on the strength of the 'article' allen put up you condemned the parents? there was nothing in the article! anywho they may be 'nut jobs' but i'll wait til the facts are out
Bert Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 It will no doubt be in the mercury tomorrow LWICD. You will be able to read about it on the website.
Head Honcho Posted 24 September 2006 Author Posted 24 September 2006 nice to see you all (well some) waiting til the full facts have come out before you start condemning the parents Whichever way you look at it in most circumstances all parents are responsible for the welfare of their children whether they are in their care at the time or not! We may be prejudging but I'll bet it's warranted and apologise if it isn't.
Head Honcho Posted 24 September 2006 Author Posted 24 September 2006 It will no doubt be in the mercury tomorrow LWICD. You will be able to read about it on the website. Not a word of it on the mercs website On the ball as ever down on St George Street!
lookwhaticando Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 but on the strength of the 'article' allen put up you condemned the parents? there was nothing in the article! anywho they may be 'nut jobs' but i'll wait til the facts are out Whichever way you look at it in most circumstances all parents are responsible for the welfare of their children whether they are in their care at the time or not! We may be prejudging but I'll bet it's warranted and apologise if it isn't. I for one will happily retract my statement if it turns out that my judgement was premature and grossly inacturate.
stez Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Whichever way you look at it in most circumstances all parents are responsible for the welfare of their children whether they are in their care at the time or not! We may be prejudging but I'll bet it's warranted and apologise if it isn't. like i said, they could be at fault, but if they weren't and they were to get wind of the condemnation they're in reciept of i bet that would help them come to terms with their loss a whole lot quicker
stez Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Not a word of it on the mercs website On the ball as ever down on St George Street! seems everyone round there was shit scared of the dogs
Bert Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 It will no doubt be in the mercury tomorrow LWICD. You will be able to read about it on the website. Not a word of it on the mercs website On the ball as ever down on St George Street!
Libertine Posted 24 September 2006 Posted 24 September 2006 Im just a pedantick fook, Allen! Or pedantic.... Sorry.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.