Swedging Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'm not going to name names. But you know who you are.
Babylon Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'm not going to name names. But you know who you are. Go on, name the names... fight fight fight fight.
SystonFox Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 ive always wanted Kelly IN. and Tiatto grabbing a goal can only help himself. come on u mighty blues. makes my day at work easy 2moro. supervisor is a dirty leeds fan
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'm not going to name names. But you know who you are. Are you trying to say we've just played well or that we've not played shit so many times over the last few months?
Mort Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 Stand by my view that RK is not the answear for the long term and Tiatto is, despite an improved season so far, not an ideal player... then again at the moment we have no other choice on either front and the result at Leeds is a good one all the same
Swedging Posted 17 October 2006 Author Posted 17 October 2006 Are you trying to say we've just played well or that we've not played shit so many times over the last few months? As Cantona might have said, "You dangle the sardines and the seagulls will come." Neither. Just, in a rather supercilious way, suggesting that neither Tiatto nor Kelly are as bad as some of the more excitable members of this forum have suggested.
davieG Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 As Cantona might have said, "You dangle the sardines and the seagulls will come." Neither. Just, in a rather supercilious way, suggesting that neither Tiatto nor Kelly are as bad as some of the more excitable members of this forum have suggested. I'm not excitable and I think Tiatto is poor, one and half so so games and one goal against piss poor opposition hasn't changed my mind.
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 As Cantona might have said, "You dangle the sardines and the seagulls will come." Neither. Just, in a rather supercilious way, suggesting that neither Tiatto nor Kelly are as bad as some of the more excitable members of this forum have suggested. I'm as pleased for Tiatto as anyone. Really pleased. I'm also pleased Hammond's done so well having said his pace was so important to us. And that we played attacking football instead of siting back and hoping for a break, and that we played with width and that Kelly got so much right. Attacking and having belief is one of the main things I've wanted Kelly to do for so long I can't count the weeks. Don't you think the outcome today makes me as chuffed as anyone else? And all the other fans who'd like to see us do ourselves justice like this. No I didn't agree with the selections because I doubted the team selected could play in that way. But they did and they demonstrated that we don't need to go and play 4-5-1's and beg for points just because the opposition has a reputation. We're better than that. And hopefully both the manager and the players have reason to believe it now.
dandannieldanok Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'm not excitable and I think Tiatto is poor, one and half so so games and one goal against piss poor opposition hasn't changed my mind. I agree with you, it sounded like he gave the ball away too often which eventually caused Hughes's yellow card.
Chimp Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'm not excitable and I think Tiatto is poor, one and half so so games and one goal against piss poor opposition hasn't changed my mind. QFE
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I agree with you, it sounded like he gave the ball away too often which eventually caused Hughes's yellow card. His main thing now is to stay fit and show he can make that sort of contribution regularly. I actually selected him to start the season (at left back, I think) because I thought he could help balance our attacking on the left but changed my feelings because he was so inconsistent and got further injury problems after doing okay on the wing. Consistency and constancy is the key to his future.
dandannieldanok Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 His main thing now is to stay fit and show he can make that sort of contribution regularly. I actually selected him to start the season (at left back, I think) because I thought he could help balance our attacking on the left but changed my feelings because he was so inconsistent and got further injury problems after doing okay on the wing. Consistency and constancy is the key to his future. I cannot see him continuing at Leicester next season.
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I cannot see him continuing at Leicester next season. Me neither but he's played a significant part in helping us to a decent win and he deserves not only credit but good wishes that he maintains his good form. Nothing cancels what's gone before, good or bad, but it sure is nice to be able to praise the guy justifiably once more.
Manwell Pablo Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 This is not going to happen, as I have said a thousand times, he's already said he's going back to Australia after this year.
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 This is not going to happen, as I have said a thousand times, he's already said he's going back to Australia after this year. If he stays fit and plays his part throughout the rest of the season it'll be the equivalent of three season's work based on last year's efforts.
Leicfox Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 I'm not going to name names. But you know who you are. Who cares tbh. we all know footie fans are fickle. these are pointless threads imo.
Milky Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 Who cares tbh. we all know footie fans are fickle. these are pointless threads imo. yet you've just made a point in it
Leicfox Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 yet you've just made a point in it ok, including me.
Janx Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 well mr Swedge, I was one, and still believe long term he hasnt got "it". Did you go tonight? I did and I saw him doing what I have been asking him to do for ages and that is AttacK... MIND YOU.. lEEDS WERE SOOO poor .. they were so square at the back it was untrue. I will congratulate when due, and we were due a win tomight...but will struggle against a quality side.
Thracian Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 well mr Swedge, I was one, and still believe long term he hasnt got "it". Did you go tonight? I did and I saw him doing what I have been asking him to do for ages and that is AttacK... MIND YOU.. lEEDS WERE SOOO poor .. they were so square at the back it was untrue. I will congratulate when due, and we were due a win tomight...but will struggle against a quality side. Enjoy it Jankers. Confidence is a funny thing. We can only beat the team we're playing against. And there's quite a lot on here who've campaigned for a more attacking approach. Long may it continue eh?
Fez of Mahrez Posted 17 October 2006 Posted 17 October 2006 It's a lot easier to be critical. I should know. But it's only because we all want better. I wouldn't have selected that midfield in a million years if everyone was fit, yet to a certain extent they've proved me wrong tonight and that's what football is all about. Now it's up to them to seize the opportunity they've created for themselves. I don't want to comment too much on individuals having not been to the match but it's obvious that a lot of them were doing something right. Looking forward to seeing us against Palace. For all the criticism I've given players like Tiatto and Low, I've also been wanting Hume and Stearman back in the side for ages. Kelly seems to have this ability to dig out results with below-par players or performances that Levein never had. I'm thrilled for him tonight.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.