Fez of Mahrez Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 ------------------------Logan--------------------- Stearman-----McAuley----Kisnorbo-----Kenton Maybury-------Porter-------Tiatto---------Welsh ---------------Hammond-----Hume-------------- Subs: Henderson, Johansson, Hughes, Gradel, Odihambo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 ------------------------Logan--------------------- Stearman-----McAuley----Kisnorbo-----Kenton Maybury-------Porter-------Tiatto---------Welsh ---------------Hammond-----Hume-------------- Subs: Henderson, Johansson, Hughes, Gradel, Odihambo. No Wesolowski at all Muzz? Logan Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Nisse Welsh Weso Tiatto Porter Hammond Hume Not sure if Weso and Tiatto in the middle will work at all, but its worth a shot. Can't be any worse than Hughes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 23 October 2006 Author Share Posted 23 October 2006 I forgot about Weso. Stick him on the bench ahead of Hughes. Wishful thinking of course, no way Kelly will pick a 16 without Low, Hughes, Sylla and O'Grady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Logan Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Nisse Sylla Tiatto Hughes Welsh Hume Hammond Subs, Hendo, maybury, o grady, low, weso Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieWorthoYaggedMyWife Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Sylla has only been around the squad for the last couple of weeks! We have only got 18 first teamers fit including Rab, Unless we play some of the kids I can't see it being too different to Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 It'll be the Chosen Men. But for me it'd be: Logan; Stearman, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Nils; Porter, Tiatto, Wesolowski, Welsh; Hammond, Hume. subs: Henderson, Maybury, Gradel, Hughes, O'Grady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vo Rogue Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Just about right Thrac,only Low instead of Porter will be the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Logan Stearman McAuley Kis Nils Low Tiatto Weso Welsh Hume Hammond Subs: Henderson, Maybury, Williams, Hughes, O'Grady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe. Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Logan Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Nisse Sylla Tiatto Hughes Welsh Hume Hammond Subs, Hendo, maybury, o grady, low, weso I think you're about spot on there mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 I think you're about spot on there mate You're probably right but it's seriously horrible. MON stiffles Welsh and that's our creative attacking strategy right out of the window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SydneyFC Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Logan Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Nisse Sylla Tiatto Weso Welsh Hume Hammond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 I'd go along with Thracian's team but be tempted to throw Gradel in at the deep end simply because Martin O'Neill will have us all figured out, especially if the likes of Low are playing. It's why they draw so many games, they don't have the players to finish teams off at the moment so there's nothing to fear. Johansson is a major concern at left back being up against Agbonlahor's pace, he's incredibly overated though IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildave3 Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Logan Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Nisse Welsh Wesolowski Tiatto Porter Hammond Hume Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 nisse is gunna get run all over 2moz not enough pace is kenton fit maybe it would be a good idea to play him at LB instead! Logan stearman kis Mcauley kenton Low weso tiatto welsh hammond hume although maybe playin slightly more attacking would be good so drop either low or weso and bring on o'grady and play o'grady and hammond upfront with hum just behind them??? wont happen i know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 radio leicester said this morning that logan will be missing , didnt hear weather it was injury or being rested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Policy I'd imagine. Support keeper takes over in the Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simi Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Injury Permitting Henderon Stearman Kisnorbo McAuley Kenton Welsh Tiatto Weso Sylla Hume Hammond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 If we want to give ourselves a better chance of progressing, Logan has to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Logan Stearman Kisnorbo © McAuley Maybury Welsh Wesolowski Hughes Porter Elvis Hume Subs: Tiatto, O'Grady, Henderson, Gradel, Nils Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 Who would be better in the middle out of tiatto and hughes? They both raise their game against prem oposition, and if Weso is fit to play who should partner him? Tiatto is more likely to make a mistake and cost us a goal ( with his crazy running across the back line and poor passing, but he also works hard and will pressure the villa midfield. Hughes has more ability than tiatto and could up his game and make a difference and help get us a goal. He may also not ge tinvolved and be a waste of space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 23 October 2006 Author Share Posted 23 October 2006 Who would be better in the middle out of tiatto and hughes? They both raise their game against prem oposition, and if Weso is fit to play who should partner him? Tiatto is more likely to make a mistake and cost us a goal ( with his crazy running across the back line and poor passing, but he also works hard and will pressure the villa midfield. Hughes has more ability than tiatto and could up his game and make a difference and help get us a goal. He may also not ge tinvolved and be a waste of space. I think it's more like who should partner Tiatto out of Hughes and Weso at the moment. I can't see him putting Weso back in for a cup tie against a Premiership team when he didn't give him a run-out on Saturday. He hasn't played for a while now and I'm not sure whether Kelly rates him highly enough to think he is that important to risk starting him ahead of Hughes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 I think it's more like who should partner Tiatto out of Hughes and Weso at the moment. I can't see him putting Weso back in for a cup tie against a Premiership team when he didn't give him a run-out on Saturday. He hasn't played for a while now and I'm not sure whether Kelly rates him highly enough to think he is that important to risk starting him ahead of Hughes. Good point, but a weso lacking match practise could be more use than a hughes or tiatto thats played Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 If we want to give ourselves a better chance of progressing, Logan has to play. It emphasises the sort of difficulties you get into when you veer from the policy of choosing your best side and providing appropriate games, whatever, for the fringe players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 It emphasises the sort of difficulties you get into when you veer from the policy of choosing your best side and providing appropriate games, whatever, for the fringe players. Rob Kelly needs to be less of a nice guy coach and a manager, pick your best players Rob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 23 October 2006 Share Posted 23 October 2006 I think it's more like who should partner Tiatto out of Hughes and Weso at the moment. I can't see him putting Weso back in for a cup tie against a Premiership team when he didn't give him a run-out on Saturday. He hasn't played for a while now and I'm not sure whether Kelly rates him highly enough to think he is that important to risk starting him ahead of Hughes. Your point is valid enough but every match carries risks - there are no easy fixtures in reality. But what you say was one of the reasons I couldn't understand Kelly not using Weso at all on Saturday, particularly as two wingers wasn't working and 4-3-3/3-4-3 might have found a way through the centre where I always felt we could take cause em trouble with Hammond's pace. As it turned out, we didn't find out and Weso didn't get any much-needed miles on the clock. Or O'Grady. Introducing Sylla had no logic at all that I could work out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.0e7438f54a80a2f2566907f77fd7a32a.thumb.png.0ea5e31693d284629c473304eabd4568.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.