Gené and Tonic Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 What does this mean then? Milan has a three year plan. I guess it's just incase some of them don't turn out as expected and we're not stuck with them for the year we're supposed to be going for promotion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morris1234 Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 What does this mean then? Milan has a three year plan.I guess it's just incase some of them don't turn out as expected and we're not stuck with them for the year we're supposed to be going for promotion. answered your own question you maybe right, tell you who knows why though! milan or martin???!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 Nielsen - don't know why it's 2 years. Possibly just in case he doesn't adjust and isn't up to it. Cautiousness rules? N'Gotty - obvious, really. He's past his peak, you'd imagine, but you need to offer him extra to get him on board - 2 years was the logical choice (he had the offer of a year in the Premiership, remember). Cort - simple, again. Huge risk with his injury record. Two years was enough to entice him, but not too long enough to shaft ourselves if he gets crocked. Kishishev - he'll be 33 when he plays for us, almost 35 when his contract expires. As for the others... Sappleton's not long out of an academy, could go either way in the first team. Sergio... his recent past doesn't warrant three years, because playing for a bunch of part-timers isn't the best of springboards for a season or two in the Championship. Basically 2 years is a good compromise in many of these cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Bob Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 I think it is a good approach, it gives the players something to play for and not take their contract for granted. Also if they are pants we can loose them quicker and sign someone else who will be pants!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston. Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 None of the signings deserve more than 2 years. Older players want stability (I'm sure it says that in football manager). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batfink77 Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 its really quite simple as 3 year plans go. First year gain easy promotion to Prem by a good 12pt margin. Sell off players still under contract to relegated Derby to use as squad players. Second year sensible spending to squeeze a top 6 placement Third year european trophy and let the cash flood in. frankly its not rocket science.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 19 June 2007 Share Posted 19 June 2007 its really quite simple as 3 year plans go.First year gain easy promotion to Prem by a good 12pt margin. Sell off players still under contract to relegated Derby to use as squad players. Second year sensible spending to squeeze a top 6 placement Third year european trophy and let the cash flood in. frankly its not rocket science.... Batfink is a great cartoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monk Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 its really quite simple as 3 year plans go.First year gain easy promotion to Prem by a good 12pt margin. Sell off players still under contract to relegated Derby to use as squad players. Second year sensible spending to squeeze a top 6 placement Third year european trophy and let the cash flood in. frankly its not rocket science.... best.post.ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationwider Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 Perhaps it's now just a two year plan? Or maybe the plan just involves not having any players in year three? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilkesy Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 its really quite simple as 3 year plans go.First year gain easy promotion to Prem by a good 12pt margin. Sell off players still under contract to relegated Derby to use as squad players. Second year sensible spending to squeeze a top 6 placement Third year european trophy and let the cash flood in. frankly its not rocket science.... Nothing wrong with being optimistic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daggers Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 Perhaps it's now just a two year plan?Or maybe the plan just involves not having any players in year three? By year three the clone production facility at Belvoir Drive should have been completed and running at three Andy Johnsons an hour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Nibblington Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 By year three the clone production facility at Belvoir Drive should have been completed and running at three Andy Johnsons an hour Does that mean it's producing three Andy Johnsons an hour, or running at the speed of 3 Andy Johnsons an hour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lester LXXIV Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 Does that mean it's producing three Andy Johnsons an hour, or running at the speed of 3 Andy Johnsons an hour? That'll never make a profit!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimp Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 Does that mean it's producing three Andy Johnsons an hour, or running at the speed of 3 Andy Johnsons an hour? Neither will that, unless there's a glue factory that pays well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molson Canadian Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 its really quite simple as 3 year plans go.First year gain easy promotion to Prem by a good 12pt margin. Sell off players still under contract to relegated Derby to use as squad players. Second year sensible spending to squeeze a top 6 placement Third year european trophy and let the cash flood in. frankly its not rocket science.... I AGREE :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonisco Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 Does that mean it's producing three Andy Johnsons an hour, or running at the speed of 3 Andy Johnsons an hour? It's one of those new-fangled metric measurements they're trying to get us to use. Bloody Europeans! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Reverend Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 So we dont get any more money grabbing cants like de Vries i suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationwider Posted 20 June 2007 Share Posted 20 June 2007 So we dont get any more money grabbing cants like de Vries i suspect. I think N'Gotty's contract should just about take him up to state pension age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.