Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Joe.

West Brom Player Ratings

By Joe., in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Joe.

Joe.

Posted
Posted

Fulop 6- Didn't actually have much to do. Not too sure what he could have done about the goals.

Stearman 5- First half started well. Then he went all Stearman on us.

McAuley 5- Don't know what's really happening with him and Kisnorbo. Awful distribution once more.

Kisnorbo 5- See McAuley

Mattock 5- Posed a slight attacking threat.

Kenton 7- Battled very well and had a good game.

Clemence 6- Looked to make things happen but just couldn't do a lot else.

Weso 5.5 (Subbed)- Didn't really notice him in the game to be honest, battled well once more.

Chambers 5- Frustrated and isolated. Received no service.

Cort 5- A tale of two halves. First half- pretty impressive, looked up for it and held it up nicely. Second half- diabolical.

Hume 6.5- Worked hard and forced our goal. Not bad.

Micky Ruddle

Micky Ruddle

Posted
Posted
Fulop 6

Stearman 5

McAuley 5

Kisnorbo 5

Mattock 5.5

Kenton 7

Clemence 6

Weso 5.5 (Subbed)

Chambers 5

Cort 5

Hume 6.5

Doesn't look good at all. :mellow:

Kenton seems to stand out in midfield, more than anyone :thumbup:

Tommy G

Tommy G

Posted
Posted

I wasn't at the game but it sounded like mattock was at fault for the first goal through poor positioning. Therefore a rating of less than 5.5 would be reasonable?

Joe.

Joe.

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I wasn't at the game but it sounded like mattock was at fault for the first goal through poor positioning. Therefore a rating of less than 5.5 would be reasonable?

Probably. Wouldn't argue with that. I remember when writing it I was going to change it to a 5 but then I actually forgot. I'll do it now.

Scaramanga!

Scaramanga!

Posted
Posted

I think the first goal was more Fulops fault, he should have claimed the ball before it even made it to Gera. Though Mattock was getting spanked by Gera every time.

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted

Fulop. 6 - What did he have to do? pick the ball out of the net twice.

Stearman. 4 - At fault for the first goal, got done twice in the space of 5-10 seconds leading toward the cross, took too long on the ball too.

Mattock. 5 - Looked god in attack, which is a stark contrast to his defending.

Kisnorbo. 5 - Won headers. Gave theball away too much.

McAuley. 5 - Hoof. Hoof. Hoof.

Kenton. 7 - Always closing down, mean in the tackle.

Clem. 7 - Much better tha his past few games, tried to make things happen, decent forward runs too.

Weso. 5 - Harried well, so frustrating about his injuries.

Chambers. 6 - Some decent runs, great pace, with some nice touches, players seemed reluctant to use him

Hume. 7 - Looks as if he's getting back to his best. Neeeds better sevice, always looking to make things happen.

Cort. 6 - Had a great first half, but died down in the 2nd, should've had a penalty.

King. 6 - Got well stuck in, kept it tight, playe dthe simple balls.

Hayes. 5 - Lazy twat. Good attacking runs, but get back and defend lad.

Referee. 0 - What a dipstick.

Bluefoxtim

Bluefoxtim

Posted
Posted

Fulop 6

Stearman 5

McAuley 5

Kisnorbo 4.5

Mattock 5

Kenton 6.5

Clemence 6

Weso 5.5

Chambers 5 - did he touch the ball?

Cort 5

Hume 4.5 - sorry but i've had enough, whenever the ball comes to him, he has to try a flick or a snazzy turn. Most of the time he just loses it. PLAY IT SIMPLE! try your tricks when we are winning, FFS.

Simi

Simi

Posted
Posted

Fulop. 6 -

Stearman. 4 - Laughing stock for the first goal, joker. Chambers in.

Mattock. 5 - Weak defending but offered pace going forward, probably why he was infront of Sheehan.

Kisnorbo. 5 - Woeful distribution.

McAuley. 5 - ^^

Kenton. 7 - MOTM

Clem. 6 - Kenton did his job, he looked lost throughout.

Weso. 5 - :(

Chambers. 6 - Nothing of major note.

Hume. 6 - Ran around a lot again, but lacked that final something, to far away from Cort.

Cort. 6 - Wasn't helped by Hume and Chambers at all.

Subs

King. 6 - Went missing to often.

Hayes. 6 - Some good runs forward, nothing more.

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
Some of those ratings are high bert considering we lost the game

Shut up. Did you go to the game? I'm allowed my opinion and that's what i thought. Player ratings don't just go on the team result.

It's how the players played during the game. Idiot.

Mark

Mark

Posted
Posted
I think the first goal was more Fulops fault, he should have claimed the ball before it even made it to Gera. Though Mattock was getting spanked by Gera every time.

Or more Stearmans fault, he was letting the ball run out for a throw in despite the fact Brunt was going to keep it in, who's inch perfect cross led to the goal. Mattock played very well today.

Bluefoxtim

Bluefoxtim

Posted
Posted
Shut up. Did you go to the game? I'm allowed my opinion and that's what i thought. Player ratings don't just go on the team result.

It's how the players played during the game. Idiot.

Alright calm down. You have given the referee a '0' why is that? Just because we lost? We were lucky to have our goal given IMO.

Tommy G

Tommy G

Posted
Posted
Shut up. Did you go to the game? I'm allowed my opinion and that's what i thought. Player ratings don't just go on the team result.

It's how the players played during the game. Idiot.

You really are a bellend sometimes, who do you think you are?

No i didnt go to the game, and glad I didnt by the sounds of it!

Tosser

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
Alright calm down. You have given the referee a '0' why is that? Just because we lost? We were lucky to have our goal given IMO.

We should've had a penatly and a number of blatant free kicks.

You really are a bellend sometimes, who do you think you are?

No i didnt go to the game, and glad I didnt by the sounds of it!

Tosser

I don't think i'm anyone mate. I just find it amusing, how you can question what my ratings were, when you didn't even go to the game.

Kilworthfox

Kilworthfox

Posted
Posted

Fulop. 7

Stearman 0 what's all the stepover business about? He lost the ball for the 1st, deserves to be dropped. Constantly poor performances

Mattock. 7 good forward running

Kisnorbo. 6 unconventional but did noting that bad.

McAuley. 6 poor in passing, passed the buck too often to a worse Stearman.

Kenton 7 started with 4 missed passes (very bad!) but ran his socks off and got stuck in

Clem. 6 got caught in possession too often but did deliver good set peices which we could have scored from.

Weso. 6 unfortunately got injured. did not notice too much

Chambers. 7 the kid's gonna be a star in a few years.

Hume. 7 Effort, got its rewards today and thats all i ask.

Cort. 1st half a 7 and second a 4 overall 6! He did chase and he did try a 1st for him, but only in the 1st half.

King. 6 the kid is not out of place, got stuck in. look like he will blossom if he can grow in his role.

Hayes. 6 pacey but with little effect, had a good go which as nice too see.

Referee. 0 gave us now't

Linesman -1 S****horpe

Kirky

Kirky

Posted
Posted

Fulop 6

Stearman 4

McAuley 6

Kisnorbo 6

Mattock 5

Kenton 7

Clemence 4.5

Weso 5.5

Chambers 6

Cort 6

Hume 5.5

King 6

Hayes 4

lookwhaticando

lookwhaticando

Posted
Posted
You really are a bellend sometimes, who do you think you are?

Some days earlier...

what a shit thread

Interesting.

Now just cut the crap and let people rate the players as they see fit. Unless you have a valid point or question, I suggest you keep it shut.

Kilworthfox

Kilworthfox

Posted
Posted
Some days earlier...

Interesting.

Now just cut the crap and let people rate the players as they see fit. Unless you have a valid point or question, I suggest you keep it shut.

:clap:

Tommy G

Tommy G

Posted
Posted
Some days earlier...

Interesting.

Now just cut the crap and let people rate the players as they see fit. Unless you have a valid point or question, I suggest you keep it shut.

My point on the thread I called shit, because it was, thats my opinion.

The 'valid' point I was making is the opinion that he rated the players too highly considering we lost the game, nothing wrong with that?

The reason I called him what I did was because he insulted me first, so it amazes me why you didnt pick his thread up? :unsure:

Simon

Simon

Posted
Posted
Or more Stearmans fault, he was letting the ball run out for a throw in despite the fact Brunt was going to keep it in, who's inch perfect cross led to the goal. Mattock played very well today.

100% spot on. Fulop and Mattock could do nothing with the goal.

I'm not going to comment on people's ratings, I'm too tired and fed up right now.

Fulop 6

Stearman 4

Kisnorbo 4

McAuley 4

Mattock 6

Kenton 7.5

Clem 4

Weso 5

Chambers 5.5

Hume 6

Cort 5

Subs:

King 5

Hayes 5

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...