davieG Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 Spanish banking giant Santander is to rebrand all of its major UK High Street brands - Abbey, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley. A total of 1,300 branches will have their names changed to Santander by the end of 2010. Any customer of the Abbey, Alliance & Leicester or Bradford & Bingley savings will be able to carry out transactions in any of Santander's UK branches. Santander is the second-biggest banking group in the world after HSBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8069648.stm Vote UKIP
Head Honcho Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 .................but they'll still charge you to withdraw your money in Spain!!!! If the EU wanted to do something useful for a change maybe putting a stop to this shambolic practice would be a start.
Darkzzz_ Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 So I am going to be part of Santander. I just bum the Spanish.
Tommy G Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 Spanish banking giant Santander is to rebrand all of its major UK High Street brands - Abbey, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley.A total of 1,300 branches will have their names changed to Santander by the end of 2010. Any customer of the Abbey, Alliance & Leicester or Bradford & Bingley savings will be able to carry out transactions in any of Santander's UK branches. Santander is the second-biggest banking group in the world after HSBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8069648.stm Vote UKIP Whats wrong with that? It's like McDonalds buying out burger king then not rebranding all off their new restaurants. 'm surprised it hasn't happened sooner really
davieG Posted 27 May 2009 Author Posted 27 May 2009 Whats wrong with that? It's like McDonalds buying out burger king then not rebranding all off their new restaurants. 'm surprised it hasn't happened sooner really Nothing from Santander's point of view it's just a shame to see more long standing British trade names disappear, it was inevitable once all the Building Societies changed to being banks, the financial system didn't need so many banks.
Guest Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 .................but they'll still charge you to withdraw your money in Spain!!!!If the EU wanted to do something useful for a change maybe putting a stop to this shambolic practice would be a start. So what about cash machines here that charge you to withdraw money? You should open an account with Nationwide, as they don't charge anything to withdraw money abroad.
Monk Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 Doesn't bother me at all. There is so much M&A in banking anyway, and if Santander hadn't bought them they'd be bust anyway. The only thing that does bother me if they are integrating the brands is - what happens where there is a B&B next to an A&L? Or in the same town? Does one close now? Or will they continue to act as seperate entities like First Direct and HSBC? Job losses come to mind.
Monk Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 So what about cash machines here that charge you to withdraw money?You should open an account with Nationwide, as they don't charge anything to withdraw money abroad. I believe that they have withdrawn the offer outside of Europe, but it is still the most competitive rate alongside the post office mastercard.
Guest Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 I believe that they have withdrawn the offer outside of Europe, but it is still the most competitive rate alongside the post office mastercard. I bloody well hope that they haven't.
Hitesh Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 I was in Bradford and Bingley today when they started changing the posters and bringing out large signs announcing that the change was happening from now until 2010. Even my cheque I got today had Abbey all over it! I was also thinking about the HUGE customer base they will have in the UK, and surely it must be close to having a monopoly?!
act smiley Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 Er, no. They're a huuuge company but so are the other major banks like Lloyds Group (Lloyds, Halifax, Bank of Scotland), RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland, Natwest, loads of insurance companies like Direct Line, ABN AMRO, etc. etc.), etc. and they don't have much other high-street presence in the UK.
City Fan Posted 27 May 2009 Posted 27 May 2009 and surely it must be close to having a monopoly?! One firm dominating the market? I don't think so.
Ultra Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 Doesn't bother me at all. There is so much M&A in banking anyway, and if Santander hadn't bought them they'd be bust anyway.The only thing that does bother me if they are integrating the brands is - what happens where there is a B&B next to an A&L? Or in the same town? Does one close now? Or will they continue to act as seperate entities like First Direct and HSBC? Job losses come to mind. It said on the news that all branches would stay open, thus removing the threat of widespread job losses. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8069648.stm
Monk Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 surely it must be close to having a monopoly?! I'm sure they have a pretty large market share - but Monopoly? No way. Not in this country. Glad to hear no job cuts. I wouldn't be suprised if they very clearly segregate what each bank offers. They are too similar otherwise.
James. Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 One firm dominating the market? I don't think so. Technically a monopoly is considered 25% of the market share.
Hitesh Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 Technically a monopoly is considered 25% of the market share. Yeah, I was thinking more on those lines and about customers having less choice.
Monk Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 Banking goes through phases of diversification and consolidation. No prizes for guessing what we're in at the moment. Ultimately there is still a lot of competition, and I don't think B&B and A&L single handedly provided an alternative to people, but I recognise what you are saying.
Shrenchel Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 .................but they'll still charge you to withdraw your money in Spain!!!!If the EU wanted to do something useful for a change maybe putting a stop to this shambolic practice would be a start. Just get a nationwide account for holidays. Doubt the EU will ever do anything about it, in quite a few countries (Spain for instance) you get charged for using a cashpoint that isn't of the bank you have your account with so they're not really treating tourists any differently from their own people.
Shrenchel Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 Oh didnt see Lisa and Monk already mentioned nationwide. I swear it's still valid outside of Europe though. Didnt charge me in Morocco a few weeks back.
Lillehamring Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 can't see many people rushing out to bank with 'santander', if it wasn't for my stupid overdraft, i'd get rid.... just hope my santander shares go up in value
Shrenchel Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 Just get the cirrus card instead of the Visa innit. Thats what Ive got. Works in 90% of cashpoints abroad.
Guest Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 One other thing, I am sure that in most other countries, people pay fees for their banking, so being charged a transaction fee would be quite normal for them.
Lillehamring Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 One other thing, I am sure that in most other countries, people pay fees for their banking, so being charged a transaction fee would be quite normal for them. yup, we even used to get charged for debit card purchases in shops but they've ditched them all now
Jordan Posted 28 May 2009 Posted 28 May 2009 It said on the news that all branches would stay open, thus removing the threat of widespread job losses.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8069648.stm I work for a large American bank that was bought by another large bank recently, and the merger process is underway with full banking and brand integration to be finished in 2010 or 2011. I don't know much about what's going on behind the scenes at A&L and B&B, but I can assume a lot of employees there are under a lot of pressure. There may not be massive layoffs in store, but jobs will be eliminated. You won't see this in plain daylight, as most early job losses will be in the offices, not the branches. Santander will not need two or three persons selling the same mortgage rates in the same community. If more than one of the Santander family banks work with the same credit card lender (say, MBNA), then those departments will all be hollowed out and merged into one unit. They'll only need one deparment for everything else that doesn't have to do with sales (for example, operational soundness areas like loss prevention and auditing, marketing, legal). Keeping all of the branches sounds well and good, but there's too much overlap between each bank's respective footprint for this to be a sound plan for the long term. It doesn't make sense to have branches so close together. Eventually, some of those branches will have to close in order to save costs. Santander are smart not to say this, as the public is already jittery about the current state of banking. And if Santander is a huge, healthy bank that can handle the crap ledger sheets they just bought in the UK, I don't think many people will worry to much about the brand name changes.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.