Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Lillehamring

actim index

Recommended Posts

Posted
Not doing great on that now.

Weales well down on the list, surely he's been one of the best, if not the best Championship goalkeeper this season :D

goalies don't seem to score too high, he's not doing too bad really, just outside the top five - i'm guessing you rank higher if you make a lot of saves, which he hasn't needed to do so much off cause of our solid defence...

champ_index_gk_top534.gif

Posted

looking a bit more healthy... and this is from thursday, last week

champ_index_gk_top535.gif

champ_index_top10031.gif

Posted
looking a bit more healthy... and this is from thursday, last week

champ_index_gk_top535.gif

champ_index_top10031.gif

Interesting to see Mr Mattock in there at number 38. Don't know why but I got the impression he wasn't doing very well for them and was at fault for a few goals.

Posted
looking a bit more healthy... and this is from thursday, last week

champ_index_gk_top535.gif

champ_index_top10031.gif

Seeing that Ritchie Wellens is not 1st let alone in the top 100, I declare Actim Index an utter joke & completely useless :thumbup:

  • 1 month later...
Posted

champ_index_top10037.gif

Fryatt is 5th

Brown is 31st

Weale is 42nd

Berner is 55th

Hobbs is 57th

Wellens is 88th

King is 93rd

Posted
Seeing that Ritchie Wellens is not 1st let alone in the top 100, I declare Actim Index an utter joke & completely useless :thumbup:

or perhaps that people are basing their opinions on what they want to think about him, that maybe he is doing less than people think.

it's very easy to remember just the good bits about players we like, many people have been saying king has been invisible but he is in the top 100 ranked players in this league, which would suggest that people aren't seeing all the work he's doing

  • 2 months later...
Posted
good reading for the brown haters :P

Good reading indeed. Nice to see Weale up there too, can't figure how Hobbs is so low in the list though…

Posted
good reading for the brown haters :P

champ_index_top10044.gif

They obviously don't record incomplete passes :whistle:

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
Posted

off again...

this from after the palace game...

3 showings isn't bad really.

champ_index_top10052.gif

Posted

Coz I was bored:

Number of players in the index - an index of an index........

Watford 9

Burnley 9

QPR 8

Ipswich 8

Doncaster 8

Coventry 8

S****horpe 7

Millwall 7

Hull 7

Derby 7

Crystal Palace 7

Leicester 3

Cardiff 3

Norwich 2

Sheffield United 2

Leeds 2

Preston 1

Portsmouth 1

Middlesbrough 1

Swansea 0

Reading 0

Bristol City 0

Barnsley 0

Nott's Forest 0

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

from before the derby game, so expect another leap from young andy - surging up but still only one city player...

champ_index_top10064.gif

Posted

It's based on "four calculations" and then they list six. Statisticians!

How is the Actim Index calculated?

Complex mathematical formulae were devised to calculate the value of each player’s contribution, match by match. In simple terms, the Actim Index comprises four calculations:

Calculation 1 – Assesses a player’s contribution to a winning team, based on points won by the team when he appeared.

Calculation 2 – Assesses a player’s performance in each game, by allocating points for actions that positively contribute to a winning performance such as shots, tackles, clearances and saves. It also takes points away from players for negative actions such as yellow/red cards and shots off target.

Calculation 3 – Allocates points based on time on the pitch.

Calculation 4 – Allocates points for goal scorers.

Calculation 5 – Allocates points for assists.

Calculation 6 – Allocates points for clean sheets.

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...