Daggers Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager
Alexikokopops Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Balti PastieLucy Pinder Lager Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager Balti Pastie Lucy Pinder Lager I have an advert for the Nike store
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Good decision. These people are potential terrorists.
Guest Basildon Fox Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Good decision. These people are potential terrorists. Not very good ones then by making themselves known to everyone.
Guest Bilo Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Wicked!Cheryl Cole Naked Banana On the subject... Lesbian Cheryl Cole Pixie Lott Chocolate Sauce
Daggers Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Good decision. These people are potential terrorists. Absolutely - make them carry out their meetings and activities in a much more clandestine fashion, that'll show 'em.
Thracian Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 Lousy decision. The original protest should have been allowed anyway and the Police should have taken the day off. The whole issue only emphasises that our society will eventually and ironically pay dearly for allowing its basic decency to be compromised and finally wrecked on the deceptively treacherous rocks of the Human Rights Act.
lou Posted 13 January 2010 Posted 13 January 2010 They were never going to go ahead with this march, it was all for publicity which theyve now got. They organised another march months ago and cancelled it due to lack of interest (not in WB though).
Zingari Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 Possible Bad taste alert. they tried to make we me go to jihad , but i said no no no :D
foxoffderby Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 Possible Bad taste alert. very funny but factualy incorrect at 1:08 seconds the 3 gents are Indian Sikhs with turbans and not Muslims or anything to do with Islam.
MPH Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 very funny but factualy incorrect at 1:08 seconds the 3 gents are Indian Sikhs with turbans and not Muslims or anything to do with Islam. really? i didnt notice.... <_< Cant help whats on the video... just posted it for the song..
Zingari Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 very funny but factualy incorrect at 1:08 seconds the 3 gents are Indian Sikhs with turbans and not Muslims or anything to do with Islam. very well spotted ,it's full of mistakes i have it on good authority that osama has a sony ericsson , and would not touch a nokia
Tony Pine Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 i doubt osama can get a signal in the cave he lives in
Thracian Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 i doubt osama can get a signal in the cave he lives in I didn't know they had caves in Paradise.
BoneDog Posted 14 January 2010 Posted 14 January 2010 very well spotted ,it's full of mistakes i have it on good authority that osama has a sony ericsson , and would not touch a nokia He's got one (or 10) of them satelleite phone thingy-ma-bobs that he uses on the very rare occasion that he's in Afghanistan to do a clip for a CIA/Al Qaeda video or to gee up the mujahideen whom he is decieving. i doubt osama can get a signal in the cave he lives in He doesn't live in the caves, he only makes a fleeting visit now and then. I'll bet he lives in luxury somewhere. In the first few days of bombing Afghanistan whoever was in charge of the operation allowed Bin's massive convoy (which included many of the top Taliban*) to travel all the way through the mountains and into Pakistan and away. I can see no other reason of allowing them to leave apart from the fact that his group is in collusion with some powerful people in the West. * These same top Taliban men had recently been to the US to meet Clinton when he was Pres and had also been given $41million by Bill's administration in one year.
MPH Posted 15 January 2010 Posted 15 January 2010 He's got one (or 10) of them satelleite phone thingy-ma-bobs that he uses on the very rare occasion that he's in Afghanistan to do a clip for a CIA/Al Qaeda video or to gee up the mujahideen whom he is decieving.He doesn't live in the caves, he only makes a fleeting visit now and then. I'll bet he lives in luxury somewhere. In the first few days of bombing Afghanistan whoever was in charge of the operation allowed Bin's massive convoy (which included many of the top Taliban*) to travel all the way through the mountains and into Pakistan and away. I can see no other reason of allowing them to leave apart from the fact that his group is in collusion with some powerful people in the West. * These same top Taliban men had recently been to the US to meet Clinton when he was Pres and had also been given $41million by Bill's administration in one year. They'll never catch him as i am sure he goes under cover in one of those burka's the women usually wear. Infact, here is a photo of him on holiday with some friends..... Think its pretty obvious which one is him....
coale39 Posted 16 January 2010 Posted 16 January 2010 They'll never catch him as i am sure he goes under cover in one of those burka's the women usually wear.Infact, here is a photo of him on holiday with some friends..... Think its pretty obvious which one is him.... Haha that pictures awesome!
Matty_89 Posted 17 January 2010 Posted 17 January 2010 These people are massive wankers, that's undeniable, but I get more cross about the willingness of the mainstream media to give what is essentially a miniscule group of extremists coverage that is grossly disproportionate to their size and influence - a platform for the shite they spout. The Muslim Council of Britain's stance, "to ensure we do not grant them the oxygen of publicity", is spot on in my view.After that 'demonstration' by Muslim extremists in Luton, I think it was, where it kicked off last year, Charlie Brooker pointed out that there were about 15 of them being daft bastards, which was splattered all over the news, and in Belfast on the same day or day after or something, 10,000 odd went on a peace march that the media didn't give a shit about. Rather than give a balanced view of what's happening in the world the media seems to be ever more obsessed with invoking our sense of outrage Couldn't agree more with what you've said, and of course the media want to show the silly buggers. . . it's the same with everything. For them, people will react more to news about the 15 kicking off, than they would do to the 10'000 peacefully protesting. Which makes the better news from their point of view?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.