Babylon Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 psst want some man-made global warming scientific data ? got some to prove it or disprove it ,and nobody will ask questions cos it's good stuff how much do you want ? I'd rather have a massive bag of 100% pure Columbian coke to blot out the 6 hours of my life spent in this thread!!!
Zingari Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 I'd rather have a massive bag of 100% pure Columbian coke to blot out the 6 hours of my life spent in this thread!!! only six hours ? you lucky b*stard , i reckon it's cost me at least thrice that and most of it on me own fookin time i really really really mean it this time
Babylon Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 only six hours ? you lucky b*stard , i reckon it's cost me at least thrice that and most of it on me own fookin time i really really really mean it this time On the bright side I'm getting paid to be on here!!... Right I'm off now, where did I put that coke!
Zingari Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 On the bright side I'm getting paid to be on here!!... Right I'm off now, where did I put that coke! so thats it , you're working for them are you ?
easilee Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 If building 7 collapsed due to fire, then it would be the first steel structure to have done so in history. The fire was mainly on the corner of the building so presumably the steel would have melted there first, and caused it to tip over rather than collapse straight down. If the order was made to demolish the building to avoid this happening, how did they prepare for such a perfect demolition in a few hours if it normally takes weeks to prepare? There are videos which show the damage to buildings 3,4,5, which are all much more damaged than bulding 7 but are still standing. Also (just heard, that's all), wasn't the person in charge of the WTC complex Dubya's cousin? Long live the conspircy thread!
Edmund Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 WTF? = I believe that a few ancient civilizations had technology perhaps more advanced than ours. Under the antarctic now I think there are cities that have been long covered. There are people there now doing digs on the downlow so they're after something.Also if we look at the nazca lines, I've read that it would be impossible to make them without being able to fly, so they probably had machines that could fly like we have. And I have seen pictures in pyramids of helicopters. In the hieroglyphics. One quick look on the net and it turned out it was erosion of the stones over time which some people interpreted as a helicopter, a submarine, some form of flying saucer, and a jet plane. A submarine in ancient Egypt :laugh:
davieG Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 =One quick look on the net and it turned out it was erosion of the stones over time which some people interpreted as a helicopter, a submarine, some form of flying saucer, and a jet plane. A submarine in ancient Egypt :laugh: Well the Nile was apt to flood regularly then.
Zingari Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 =One quick look on the net and it turned out it was erosion of the stones over time which some people interpreted as a helicopter, a submarine, some form of flying saucer, and a jet plane. A submarine in ancient Egypt :laugh: you don't believe it ? have you never seen the film Cleopatra , with Liz Taylor in the title role ? you can quite clearly see a jet aeroplane cross the sky and here's the proof , oh ye of little faith http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056937/goofs
breadandcheese Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 1. The fire was supposedly so hot (in reality it wasn't, the evidence and science prove that, beyond doubt) that it could melt steel and create molten metal! There were many people walking about up there and some even got out who were in above floors.The fact of the matter is that no fire could cause any of the metal to get anywhere near melting. Not just content with taking down the Twin Towers, looks like those crazy zionists took down a random freeway bridge in San Francisco in 2007. Apparently, the gasoline fire heated the steel in the joints and caused them to fail. ttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/29/us/29cnd-collapse.html A quote from the article: "He was not the only one wondering how the overpass, which dates to the 1950’s, had failed. At a noontime press conference held at a toll plaza near the collapse, Mr. Kempton said the heat from the fireball had likely melted the steel girders and bolts that support the concrete roadway. “If you have that kind of heat, you’re going to have this kind of reaction,” he said. “We’re not surprised this happened.” I think it more likely that the steel suffered a failure under the heat, thus showing that it can indeed happen, similar to the twin towers.
Zingari Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 there's a rumour going around Frisco that the local university wants to build a swimming pool on the site of the bridge ( and its got a preservation order on it ) , so loads of stoodents have been sneaking out at night and weakening it
l444ry Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 How many conspirators does it take to pull off 9/11? What is the total? It's hard to say, not least because some people could have more than one conspiracy or coverup-related task. Still, here are some of the people who have very useful knowledge about 9/11 events (assuming you accept all the 9/11 conspiracy theories; cross off names here for the ones you don’t) CIA agent Larry Mitchell for meeting with bin Laden in the months before 9/11, and everyone else in the CIA who knows they're not actually trying to capture him after all GW Bush and various family members (if you're to believe the relevance of Bush family members being involved with the WTC security company Stratesec) Condoleezza Rice (if you believe she had enough knowledge to warn Willie Brown that he might be in danger) John Ashcroft (if you believe he had enough knowledge to decide not to fly commercial flights) Larry Silverstein (if you believe he knew 9/11 was coming and that there were explosives in WTC7) The 19 people who played the part of the hijackers, if you believe they were just their to play a role and were never on the planes Enough senior people at the FBI to block progress in the Moussaoui case, ensure the Phoenix memo was ignored, and more Ahmad Umar Sheikh for funding the hijackers, General Mahmoud Ahmad for ordering him to do so, and enough of the ISI to get the money and cover up that they were doing this for the US Everyone who found out about the attacks in advance, and chose not to go into work rather than warn anyone else, and didn't mention this after the fact (thousands of Israelis in the towers, and so on), and everyone who warned them Everyone responsible for the insider trading before the attacks, the CIA for supposedly monitoring these transactions but doing nothing about them, and enough of the SEC and FBI to ensure that the report was a whitewash The members of Bush’s secret service team on 9/11 (who presumably either knew in advance that he was safe, or haven’t spoken out about their surprise about what happened subsequently) The five "dancing Israelis" who filmed the attack "as it happened", and presumably many others in Israeli Intelligence, and enough people in the police or FBI to cover up the details of the case and get them shipped out Everyone responsible for planting evidence in the hijackers cars, bags and so on Everyone responsible for planting evidence in the WTC wreckage (passports etc), or removing it (WTC black boxes) Air Traffic Control and flight schedulers at the takeoff airports (to cope with the double flights), and to make sure they didn't follow procedure in reporting the hijackings promptly Whoever prepared the "special" planes swapped for the real flights, complete with "missile pod" for firing into the towers just before impact, and the ATC and Norad staff who didn't mention the swap Norad and senior officers working at the day (so they could lie about the war games and their lack of response) Fighter pilots who deliberately flew too slowly so they wouldn't reach the aircraft in time Whoever shot down Flight 93, and the senior officers who helped cover it up Everyone who researched the passengers, then all the actors who used that research to make fake mobile calls to their relatives, and either the phone company or the FBI for covering up the phone records Everyone involved in killing hundreds of passengers, assuming they didn't die in the crashes and were killed later Everyone involved in transporting their bodies to the various scenes if they did, or faking the DNA evidence if they didn't The people who researched the WTC to find out the best place to place explosives The people who planted the explosives through the WTC towers and WTC7 Whoever detonated the WTC explosives at various different times of the day Enough of the New York Fire and Police Departments to shut up everyone else and make sure they didn't try to investigate why all their friends and colleagues died Everyone who prepared the remote control plane that really flew into the Pentagon, and whoever remote-controlled it, and the Washington Air Traffic Controllers who aren't allowed to talk about the extra radar blip they saw over the Pentagon (if Flight 77 really flew over it) The Sheraton hotel staff who reportedly saw the video of the plane as it flew past to the Pentagon, but have never said that it wasn't the "official" flight The people who ensured the Pentagon missile defence systems were disabled to the plane could hit The people who planted the fake Pentagon evidence, from body parts to black boxes, and those who prepared it The people who faked additional evidence around the Pentagon, bringing down lampposts etc in an effort to make it look like a large winged plane carried out the attack Rudolph Giuliani for having advance knowledge that the WTC was going to collapse, and for helping to ensure that the steel was disposed of quickly Enough people at American and United Airlines to keep quiet about the absence of the hijackers names from the passenger manifests Enough people at CNN not to question the absence of the hijackers names from the flight manifests, if you believe that's what their victims lists really are Enough people at FEMA and NIST to ensure any reports and analyses produced were whitewashes Enough senior officials at the many WTC insurance companies to ensure the doubts were ignored and claims were paid Everyone involved in producing the fake bin Laden "confession" video(s) Khalid Al-Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi Bin Al-Sheeba for discussing how they planned 9/11 on audio tape even though this didn’t happen, and perhaps al Jazeera reporter Yosri Fouda for getting the interview (if we assume he knows it isn't true) All the other Al Qaeda members who've either implicitly or explicitly accepted responsibility for 9/11, even when they know it was carried out by someone else The staff of the 9/11 Commission for deliberately obscuring the truth Sounds reasonable, I think, but this is only the start....
l444ry Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 Titanic Conspiracy Theory Sunk A long held conspiracy theory, held by El Empty and Zingari, regarding the sinking of the Titanic was dispelled yesterday when a submersible helicopter, previously used by Egyptians, took underwater photographs of the Titanic on the sea bed. They have long claimed that the iceberg was not responsible for the sinking of the Titanic but that, prior to her maiden voyage, parties involved in a major insurance scam had arranged for the seams of the first class, second class and staff swimming pools to be deliberately weakened. The first class swimming pool was situated directly above the ships boiler room and when the ship hit the icebergs the resulting judder split the weakened seams sending thousands of gallons of water through the intervening decks onto the ships boiler ...putting out the fires ..and leaving the ship dead in the water. In a domino effect the other swimming pools, situated aft, also split their seams sending thousands of gallons of water pouring into the stern of the ship ...with the boilers out of action the pumps were not operational with the result that the ship began to settle by the stern A decision was taken that a hole be cut into the bottom of the ship for the water to drain away....sadly, as we now know, the ship sank before the water could be drained away. However the recent underwater photos now discount this theory as they show that all three swimming pools on the Titanic are still full.
Edmund Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 Brilliant, especially : However the recent underwater photos now discount this theory as they show that all three swimming pools on the Titanic are still full.
Zingari Posted 5 February 2010 Posted 5 February 2010 oi ; larry you cheeky booger once again , not that many people need to know the "whole picture" compartmentalization: an organizational strategy analogous to the old parable of the blind men and an elephant -- each of the men is asked to describe what the elephant is, and all accurately describe their perception (trunk, tusk, legs, ears, tail, body), but none of them understand what the entire elephant is. Covert operations succeed by keeping most of the participants focused on their particular task, unaware of the full situation. Compartmentalization means that only key people in key places need to know what their role in a covert operation is -- others nearby might not be aware of those ensuring the success of the operation. This practice refutes the claim that too many people would have had to know about 9/11 for a conspiracy to allow it to have been possible. http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_20.htm the rest is caused by mass confusion and disbelief , but you write some cracking stuff do you write for private eye or something ?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.