Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
lcfcbradyboy

Team For Burnley

By lcfcbradyboy, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

lcfcbradyboy

lcfcbradyboy

Posted
Posted

this is the team i would love to see if we play like we did against boro ;)

GK) Weale

RB) Lamey

CB) Hobbs

CB) Moreno

LB) Berner

CM) Wellens

CM) Oakley

CM) King

RW) Campbell

ST) Howard

LW) Dyer ( Or gallagher as i think he only lasts 30mins at the most)

Sub1: Logan

Sub2: Neilson

Sub3: Vitor (if fit)

Sub4: Gallagher

Sub5: Moussa

Sub6: Fryatt

Sub7: Crnic (sorry if spelt the name rong)

i want to see how some of the new boys play but i think crnic , moussa and vitor will get to start against leeds so we will have to wait and see)

:scarf:

iBleedLeicesterColours

iBleedLeicesterColours

Posted
Posted

this is the team i would love to see if we play like we did against boro ;)

GK) Weale

RB) Lamey

CB) Hobbs

CB) Moreno

LB) Berner

CM) Wellens

CM) Oakley

CM) King

RW) Campbell

ST) Howard

LW) Dyer ( Or gallagher as i think he only lasts 30mins at the most)

Sub1: Logan

Sub2: Neilson

Sub3: Vitor (if fit)

Sub4: Gallagher

Sub5: Moussa

Sub6: Fryatt

Sub7: Crnic (sorry if spelt the name rong)

i want to see how some of the new boys play but i think crnic , moussa and vitor will get to start against leeds so we will have to wait and see)

:scarf:

Completely agree. Oakley looks comfortable in that DM role. Not got the legs anymore but I am one that has always rated him, breaks up play and a very good passer and therefore deserves to keep his place. I didnt think dyer did much yesterday so id play gally instead but otherwise spot on.

dandannieldanok

dandannieldanok

Posted
Posted

Yep same team as Boro for me too. The only change I'd consider is Fryatt for Howard but that might be a bit hasty. Howard simply came up against a monster in Wheater yesterday, hopefully he'll get more change off the Burnley centre-halves.

lcfcbradyboy

lcfcbradyboy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

i thought neilson play good the first 2 games but against boro i felt he was going back to hitting the balls into the air and went to no one and when lamey came on i thought he looked great

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

i thought neilson play good the first 2 games but against boro i felt he was going back to hitting the balls into the air and went to no one and when lamey came on i thought he looked great

Lamey's first 3 passes were misplaced, I'm assuming it was nerves. As for Neilson most of the time he had no winger in front of him as an outlet and the midfield was covered / stood off from him so I'm not surprised he was hitting aimless balls forward.

dandannieldanok

dandannieldanok

Posted
Posted

Lamey's first 3 passes were misplaced, I'm assuming it was nerves. As for Neilson most of the time he had no winger in front of him as an outlet and the midfield was covered / stood off from him so I'm not surprised he was hitting aimless balls forward.

Agreed, I personally can't understand how everyone on here and on RL came to the conclusion that Lamey was awesome......but oh well.

Edmund

Edmund

Posted
Posted

Lamey's first 3 passes were misplaced, I'm assuming it was nerves. As for Neilson most of the time he had no winger in front of him as an outlet and the midfield was covered / stood off from him so I'm not surprised he was hitting aimless balls forward.

Are you sure?

He hit one dodgy one but they all reached Leicester shirts. He also bombed forward at electric speed. Obviously he didn't have enough time to really show what he can do but I thought he looked exciting when he came on. Looked anything but nervous if you ask me.

Simmo86

Simmo86

Posted
Posted

Imo Lamey was average when he came on yesterday, but in future I think he'll probably be a better option a right back for us playing 4-3-3. Impressed with Robbie yesterday though.

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

Are you sure?

He hit one dodgy one but they all reached Leicester shirts. He also bombed forward at electric speed. Obviously he didn't have enough time to really show what he can do but I thought he looked exciting when he came on. Looked anything but nervous if you ask me.

99.99% I commented on it at the time adding them up as he produced them. I guess at best it could have been 3 from his first 4 but hey let's not make a big issue of it, it wasn't a condemnation of him just an observation to balance the he was 'perfect' view.

Unabomber

Unabomber

Posted
Posted

GK: Weale

RB: Neilson (first name on the team sheet)

CB: Moreno

CB: Hobbs

LB: Berner

DM: Wellens

CM: King

AM: Gallagher

RWF: Dyer

CF: Howard

LWF: DJ

ibbosuk

ibbosuk

Posted
Posted

Hopefully the team for the Burnley game will have a couple of "Quality additions".

We definately need to have more options going forward or we are going to be "Another Swansea"

More firepower from midfield, more match winners in the team..

££££££££££££££££:please:££££££££££££:please:££££££££££££:please:£££££££££££££

Dylan

Dylan

Posted
Posted

Not been to any of the games so far, so this is going on commentary.

Weale



Neilson - Hobbs - Moreno - Berner

Oakley - Wellens

King

Dyer - - - - - - - - - - - - - Campbell

Fryatt

Think Neilson deserves to start. Fryatt should start, use Howard as an impact sub. And Dyer and Campbell on the wings.

lcfcbradyboy

lcfcbradyboy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

3 reasons y i wanted lamey to start

1. Much Quciker

2. Good at getting forward

3. Better Passer

but fair play to neilson good assist to andy king vs palace and a goal vs macclesfield but i do think lamey should start

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

3 reasons y i wanted lamey to start

1. Much Quciker

2. Good at getting forward

3. Better Passer

but fair play to neilson good assist to andy king vs palace and a goal vs macclesfield but i do think lamey should start

In al fairness, Robbie seems to have picked up the knack for getting forward so that's not really valid. I've only seem Lamey play on Saturday so not nearly enough to judge on properly.

Simmo86

Simmo86

Posted
Posted

Hopefully this week Sousa will be able to bring in some players so we never have to rely on the dithering Howard or shambolic Dyer unless it is an emergency.

Really?? Been one of our best players for me :dunno:

ibbosuk

ibbosuk

Posted
Posted

Hopefully this week Sousa will be able to bring in some players so we never have to rely on the dithering Howard or shambolic Dyer unless it is an emergency.

Except the Howard comment..............But Dyer is, and has always been, a quality player for Leicester.:yesyes:

lcfc"weasel"

lcfc"weasel"

Posted
Posted

Same team as 'Boro for me. Neilson has improved a 100-fold on his performances from last season. Don't see the need to drop Howard as he was quality when he came on against Palace and against Macclesfield in the cup. I think he struggled in the air yesterday but he still held the ball up well when it came into his feet.

Heskey2011

Heskey2011

Posted
Posted

3 reasons y i wanted lamey to start

1. Much Quciker

2. Good at getting forward

3. Better Passer

but fair play to neilson good assist to andy king vs palace and a goal vs macclesfield but i do think lamey should start

Yeah agree with this, got to give lamey a good go, Nielson's had plenty of chances and tbh not taken them, Lamey = future

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Yeah agree with this, got to give lamey a good go, Nielson's had plenty of chances and tbh not taken them, Lamey = future

At 30 years old? Hardly a long future is it?

Bugg

Bugg

Posted
Posted

Yeah agree with this, got to give lamey a good go, Nielson's had plenty of chances and tbh not taken them, Lamey = future

What? lol

He's been quality so far this season and dropping him is unfair.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...