lestajigs Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 Up till this moment I was convinced that Magnum P.I. was the greatest ever detective. Now you'd better have a good tache and a fast car or you can fvck right off for ruining my world.
lestajigs Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 More like the pink fooking panther!!!!! Ha ha ha
The Doctor Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 1. He used attacking tactics with a team whom the majority were used to playing a more cautious style of play over the previous two years under Nigel Pearson.2. In his previous two jobs at Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City, he used defensive tactics and then joined a team who had played similar tactics for two years, and completely changed the style of play - which is extremely rare for a manager to do. 3. He did not bring in many players to suit his attack minded approach. 4. On the touchline and in interviews, he never showed much passion, enthusiasm and frustration when things were going wrong. 5. Comparing his post match interviews, he often replied in a similar manor and said similar things after each game. 1 - And? New managers often bring a fresh style of play to the club 2 - As i remember his previous clubs did tend to attack, they were just incapable of scoring. 3 - Waghorn, Moussa? 4 - That's because he's one cool customer, or he was pre-occupied deciding his outfit for hitting the town later on. Take your pick. 5 - Maybe he was just vocally/intellectually challenged, like a portugese George W Bush?
Fox You Forest Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 I'm not sure which is worse, the shit he came out with or you taking the time to answer him.
Uncle Monty Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 Ever since ex Portuguese International Paulo Sousa left the Club I have often wandered whether he was bribed by an outside source - offering him money to ensure games were purposely lost. Here are five factors that support my suspicions: 1. He used attacking tactics with a team whom the majority were used to playing a more cautious style of play over the previous two years under Nigel Pearson. 2. In his previous two jobs at Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City, he used defensive tactics and then joined a team who had played similar tactics for two years, and completely changed the style of play - which is extremely rare for a manager to do. 3. He did not bring in many players to suit his attack minded approach. 4. On the touchline and in interviews, he never showed much passion, enthusiasm and frustration when things were going wrong. 5. Comparing his post match interviews, he often replied in a similar manor and said similar things after each game. Now as much as I am a great admirer of Sousa and feel he wasn't given enough time to work his magic, it does raise the question. People love their crazy conspiracies.
Guest Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 To be fair, I reckon Tom Selleck would've got us more points
5waller5 Posted 25 November 2010 Posted 25 November 2010 Where's El Empty when you need him? And I just realised what WUM stands for The penny just isn't dropping for me on the WUM thing!!!!
Conscript Fox Posted 26 November 2010 Posted 26 November 2010 Ever since ex Portuguese International Paulo Sousa left the Club I have often wandered whether he was bribed by an outside source - offering him money to ensure games were purposely lost. Here are five factors that support my suspicions: 1. He used attacking tactics with a team whom the majority were used to playing a more cautious style of play over the previous two years under Nigel Pearson. 2. In his previous two jobs at Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City, he used defensive tactics and then joined a team who had played similar tactics for two years, and completely changed the style of play - which is extremely rare for a manager to do. 3. He did not bring in many players to suit his attack minded approach. 4. On the touchline and in interviews, he never showed much passion, enthusiasm and frustration when things were going wrong. 5. Comparing his post match interviews, he often replied in a similar manor and said similar things after each game. Now as much as I am a great admirer of Sousa and feel he wasn't given enough time to work his magic, it does raise the question. You are onto something here Philbert, without doubt. Where do you intend taking it to next? the truth must out, its your duty to see this through, good luck.
The Doctor Posted 26 November 2010 Posted 26 November 2010 To be fair, I reckon Tom Selleck would've got us more points who is tom selleck?
Alexikokopops Posted 26 November 2010 Posted 26 November 2010 who is tom selleck? The guy in these pictures Up till this moment I was convinced that Magnum P.I. was the greatest ever detective. Now you'd better have a good tache and a fast car or you can fvck right off for ruining my world.
Leicester_Loyal Posted 26 November 2010 Posted 26 November 2010 Or maybe, just maybe, he was a shit manager.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.