Out Foxed Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Five years after she was gutted by fire, London's famous 19th century tea clipper the Cutty Sark will reopen to the public this week. Many feared a unique piece of maritime history had been lost but on Wednesday the Queen will officially reopen the ship, following a £50 million conservation project. Tim Muffett joined Richard Doughty of the Cutty Sark Trust on board for a special preview. looks great, that guy is great too. they should keep him there to show everyone around. i look forward to being able to see it. video in the link http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17819755
Trav Le Bleu Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 I've always wanted to see the Cutty Sark, can't think why though, above any other ship. It is kind of a shame though that much of what you see now won't actually be the The Cutty Sark, but a replica (though of course you could argue that with any historical building or engineering achievement, a lot of the parts would have been replaced from the very first outfitting.)
Lamby Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 It looks nice now, and you can visit when you come here next season
Guest Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Should I post: Cutty sark isn't that a type of dress? or £50m and mostly from the lottery money. How ridiculous!!!!!!! Heard it cost twice as much as promised too.
OzFox Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Don't suppose they ever busted anyone for setting fire to it in the first place?
James. Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Don't suppose they ever busted anyone for setting fire to it in the first place? Heard on BBC Breakfast this morning that it was caused by someone accidentally leaving an industrial vacuum on overnight which overheated. That sucks but at least it wasn't arson.
OzFox Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Heard on BBC Breakfast this morning that it was caused by someone accidentally leaving an industrial vacuum on overnight which overheated. That sucks but at least it wasn't arson. Whoops! Was just reading that they only lost 2% of the ship as most of it was off site being renovated. Amazing considering the size of the fire
Guest Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Heard on BBC Breakfast this morning that it was caused by someone accidentally leaving an industrial vacuum on overnight which overheated. That sucks but at least it wasn't arson. a vacuum sucks.
Lamby Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 It's annoying though cos I'm in Greenwich tomorrow so I gotta go through all the traffic jams and what not is caused by everyone wanting to see the Queen <_<
Guest Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 It's annoying though cos I'm in Greenwich tomorrow so I gotta go through all the traffic jams and what not is caused by everyone wanting to see the Queen <_< Bloody royalists (no really I like the queen).
I am Rod Hull Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 It's annoying though cos I'm in Greenwich tomorrow so I gotta go through all the traffic jams and what not is caused by everyone wanting to see the Queen <_<
Lamby Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Doesn't go to Greenwich...North Greenwich yes, but thats miles away from main Greenwich
I am Rod Hull Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Doesn't go to Greenwich...North Greenwich yes, but thats miles away from main Greenwich Ummm!
Lamby Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Spose I just have to bare the traffic then. Despite being a South Londoner I've never actually been inside the Cutty Sark
Out Foxed Posted 24 April 2012 Author Posted 24 April 2012 Spose I just have to bare the traffic then. Despite being a South Londoner I've never actually been inside the Cutty Sark just get the insides of this instead
Lamby Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 So its essentially a brand new 'replica'? Nope, its the same one. well about 90% is
purpleronnie Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Nope, its the same one. well about 90% is Blimey that's impressive.
Lamby Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Blimey that's impressive. I don't know the exact figure, but if only 2% of it was destroyed and most of it was at a depot then it should be 90%+ real
I am Rod Hull Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 I don't know the exact figure, but if only 2% of it was destroyed and most of it was at a depot then it should be 90%+ real Was the Hoover a write off?
Webbo Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Was the Hoover a write off? Wouldn't be a blow if it was.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 Spose I just have to bare the traffic then. Despite being a South Londoner I've never actually been inside the Cutty Sark You probably suffer from the same "I'll-Get-Round-To-It-One-Day" syndrome that I have and I think afflicts many people, where, when something is just on your doorstep, you keep putting it off. I'm the same with the National Space Centre. I'm pretty sure that if it were in Nottingham or Birmingham I'd have visited it by now.
Guest Posted 24 April 2012 Posted 24 April 2012 I don't know the exact figure, but if only 2% of it was destroyed and most of it was at a depot then it should be 90%+ real and if 2% cost £50m, we're lucky it wasn't 80%
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.