WW3 On The Way - Sensationalist Alert!

[Reynard Bleu]

Everyone still got their white sheets and white paint to reflect the blast?

[Rincewind]

I'm not worried anyway. I'm too old to be called up for action and unless my house is targeted with a bomb then I am safe. Can any major countries afford a costly world wide war? Does any country have the manpower to engage in major conflicts? Transporting arms and men across the globe then keeping them there at a cost? Will the UN sanction a World war?

These are some of the questions I believe should be looked at before we start to panic.

[Zingari]

I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s far too late to prevent a war organised by globalist elite , because there are far too many people now that would rather believe in preposterous scientific explanations that are passed off as facts , than to believe in any possibility that they could be deceived .

It’s astonishing the amount of people even after nearly 50 years that are prepared to accept the ridiculous magic bullet theory and headshot from the rear killed JFK , rather than the plainly obvious explanation of 2 or more rifles with at least 1 of them to the front .

It’s just as astonishing that even after 10 years there are still people prepared to believe that a 47 storey steel frame building can just collapse into it’s own footprint at close to free fall speed , and display all the other characteristics of controlled demolition , and yet still be convinced it was random fires and external damage .

Scientists can do what priests and holy men used to do and that is to convince the masses that any old bullshit is provable ( butterflies wings causing hurricanes etc what a load of old shite )

All they have to do now is say they will change when proven wrong , and this gives them a great advantage over the intransigent holy men of history.

Have a nice day

edit;

I realise this is not strictly related to the thread , but I just wanted a bit of a rant

[Guest]

There were "world wars" before 1914.

[Rincewind]

Saw this a few years ago. There are about 8 parts. Can't seem to post the first part. Did have it on a VHS tape but don't use the player now.

http://www.liveleak....=151_1274968510

[OzFox]

It’s astonishing the amount of people even after nearly 50 years that are prepared to accept the ridiculous magic bullet theory and headshot from the rear killed JFK , rather than the plainly obvious explanation of 2 or more rifles with at least 1 of them to the front .

It’s just as astonishing that even after 10 years there are still people prepared to believe that a 47 storey steel frame building can just collapse into it’s own footprint at close to free fall speed , and display all the other characteristics of controlled demolition , and yet still be convinced it was random fires and external damage .

Just let it go, let it go.....breathe deeply, relax and come into the light. Think of little birds, pretty flowers, and butterfly wings...oh sorry no, not butterfly wings...

Are you and Empty on opposite shifts? It's quite simple. Most people believe those theories because they are a lot more believable than the alternatives. On the other hand I'm sure a lot of people believe conspiracy theories because they are a lot more interesting than the truth

[Guest]

It's a good job that Chicken's wings can't cause hurricanes (or can they? ) otherwise KFC would be in trouble.

[Zingari]

Just let it go, let it go.....breathe deeply, relax and come into the light. Think of little birds, pretty flowers, and butterfly wings...oh sorry no, not butterfly wings...

Are you and Empty on opposite shifts? It's quite simple. Most people believe those theories because they are a lot more believable than the alternatives. On the other hand I'm sure a lot of people believe conspiracy theories because they are a lot more interesting than the truth

ok right

something that's never happened before or since ie a steel building collapsing due to fire and damage

or something that's happened thousands of times ie a building collapsing due to contolled demolition

i'll stick to the boring obvious explanation

[Rincewind]

There was a trillienth (or more) chance of a few cells combining to form life on this planet but it happened. Or you can believe that an all powerful being waved a hand and crated everything.

[OzFox]

ok right

something that's never happened before or since ie a steel building collapsing due to fire and damage

or something that's happened thousands of times ie a building collapsing due to contolled demolition

i'll stick to the boring obvious explanation

yeah i'l

Well, the obvious boring explanation is that it collapsed because it was right next to two 110 story towers that also collapsed.

I'd say that makes it quite unique unless you know of any other similar circumstances?

[Guest]

Or you could believe that the all powerful being waved a hand and created the big bang.

Don't limit your options.

[breadandcheese]

Tupac's alive. I hear he's going to reveal himself after the war and lead the remainder of humanity into a post-war utopian society.

[m4DD0gg]

Well to be honest the tension between the west (US, UK and Isreal) and Syria, Iran and Russia is the highest its been for a long time.

I can see something kicking off sooner or later.

[Guest]

^{Russia have too much money in british football to side with Iran.}

[davieG]

I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s far too late to prevent a war organised by globalist elite , because there are far too many people now that would rather believe in preposterous scientific explanations that are passed off as facts , than to believe in any possibility that they could be deceived .

It’s astonishing the amount of people even after nearly 50 years that are prepared to accept the ridiculous magic bullet theory and headshot from the rear killed JFK , rather than the plainly obvious explanation of 2 or more rifles with at least 1 of them to the front .

It’s just as astonishing that even after 10 years there are still people prepared to believe that a 47 storey steel frame building can just collapse into it’s own footprint at close to free fall speed , and display all the other characteristics of controlled demolition , and yet still be convinced it was random fires and external damage .

Scientists can do what priests and holy men used to do and that is to convince the masses that any old bullshit is provable ( butterflies wings causing hurricanes etc what a load of old shite )

All they have to do now is say they will change when proven wrong , and this gives them a great advantage over the intransigent holy men of history.

Have a nice day

edit;

I realise this is not strictly related to the thread , but I just wanted a bit of a rant

Rants like that could start a World War.

[Zingari]

Rants like that could start a World War.

no fecker listens to my rants

[Zingari]

Well, the obvious boring explanation is that it collapsed because it was right next to two 110 story towers that also collapsed.

I'd say that makes it quite unique unless you know of any other similar circumstances?

This is a very short video of wtc 7 collapse .

Watch it over and over , because it should eventually dawn on you that the official explanation of collapse due to fire and damage is not possible .

Any damage caused to the building would have been asymmetric and any collapse would have been asymmetric too.

This is a perfect example of a controlled demolition with all of the characteristics displayed, including the huge pyroclastic clouds rolling away .

There was another building that stood between wtc 1 and 7 , and this would have absorbed the worst of the debris and it remained standing .

[OzFox]

This is a very short video of wtc 7 collapse .

Watch it over and over , because it should eventually dawn on you that the official explanation of collapse due to fire and damage is not possible .

Any damage caused to the building would have been asymmetric and any collapse would have been asymmetric too.

This is a perfect example of a controlled demolition with all of the characteristics displayed, including the huge pyroclastic clouds rolling away .

There was another building that stood between wtc 1 and 7 , and this would have absorbed the worst of the debris and it remained standing .

I've got a strong sensation of deja vu here.

OK you win. They blew it up. And "they" were probably the same people that shot Kennedy from the front, faked the moon landings and told Anders what to do. I'm just glad they didn't blow up the Century 21 discount store across the road. You can buy some really good stuff in there

[Zingari]

I've got a strong sensation of deja vu here.

OK you win. They blew it up. And "they" were probably the same people that shot Kennedy from the front, faked the moon landings and told Anders what to do. I'm just glad they didn't blow up the Century 21 discount store across the road. You can buy some really good stuff in there

Yeah right anyone who questions the government must be a lunatic who believes anything .

Just ask yourself this, if you were totally unaware of the events of the day, which explanation would you believe?

Collapse due to random fire/damage?

Collapse due to expert demolition?

I really believe the events of the day have seriously clouded people’s minds and logical thought process.

But as you say it is a bit deja vu, so i'm blaming the fookin French

[Trav Le Bleu]

What's the Doomsday Clock at now then? Seriously you need to be more worried about the socio-economic situation and the possibility of a global spiral of economic depression, which of course could spark off wars here and there. I wouldn't say that World War 3 is impossible, but it certainly wouldn't be an apocalyptic nuclear armageddon.

[Rincewind]

Is there video footage of the WT7 collapse from other sides of the building?

[James.]

Conspiracy theories often fail to explain WHY "they" did it and instead focus on HOW.

With regards 9/11 WHY would they demolish these buildings? Surely there are slightly more life-friendly ways of instigating a war on terror without killing shitloads of your own citizens.

[Rincewind]

Always been my view. The how. The other buildings were hit by planes and the WTC was damaged so it would be a sensationally gifted bomb expert to know where to place the explosives and knowing what damage has been caused in order to make it look like a controlled explosion.

[OzFox]

Yeah right anyone who questions the government must be a lunatic who believes anything .

Just ask yourself this, if you were totally unaware of the events of the day, which explanation would you believe?

Collapse due to random fire/damage?

Collapse due to expert demolition?

I really believe the events of the day have seriously clouded people’s minds and logical thought process.

But as you say it is a bit deja vu, so i'm blaming the fookin French

As it happens, I was unaware of the events of that day. I didn't know anything had happened until the 13th. Must have been the last person on the planet to find out

If I was still unaware I would trust the majority of witness reports, especially the emergency services. Many of them predicted it would collapse because it had a bloody great hole in it, and lo and behold, it did.

I reckon the world will end when you finally admit I'm right and you're wrong. With that in mind, I'm pretty sure we're safe as houses

[OzFox]

Is there video footage of the WT7 collapse from other sides of the building?

There's a couple of videos from another angle showing a big hole in the building. Pretty sure they'd be somewhere on last years 9/11 thread....if it hasn't imploded under the weight of weird and wonderful Youtube videos