dave the caveman Posted 26 April 2012 Posted 26 April 2012 no it won't it will fall to one side try sawing off one leg of a table ,you can load the table with concrete slabs if you like then set fire to the legs . i bet it falls in the direction of the weakest point (the corner with no leg) this is because the legs even weakened by fire will offer at least some resistance to the fall actually this is too fookin ridiculous to answer because we're talking about a "steel framed" building and i'm annoyed that i've actually bothered to answer this That's because the legs are very strong relative to the weight of the table, even if loaded with some concrete slabs. You obviously know nothing about the construction of large buildings or the physical capabilities of steel, so why you feel qualified to call what I am saying "ridiculous", i really don't know. Regardless, you don't have to believe me. There are plenty of text books that you can read to learn about forces and loads if you want to. But I guess you won't because it seems you prefer the obviously incorrect but relatively exciting opinion over the boring truth.
Zingari Posted 26 April 2012 Posted 26 April 2012 That's because the legs are very strong relative to the weight of the table, even if loaded with some concrete slabs. You obviously know nothing about the construction of large buildings or the physical capabilities of steel, so why you feel qualified to call what I am saying "ridiculous", i really don't know. Regardless, you don't have to believe me. There are plenty of text books that you can read to learn about forces and loads if you want to. But I guess you won't because it seems you prefer the obviously incorrect but relatively exciting opinion over the boring truth. let's cut out the bricks on straw bullshit , show me another " steel framed building " that has collapsed due to fire , there are hundreds of examples of steel framed high rise buildings suffering much worse fire damage and the frame remains !! just show me one ok ?
dave the caveman Posted 26 April 2012 Posted 26 April 2012 let's cut out the bricks on straw bullshit , show me another " steel framed building " that has collapsed due to fire , there are hundreds of examples of steel framed high rise buildings suffering much worse fire damage and the frame remains !! just show me one ok ? Show me one that has fallen to the side.
Zingari Posted 26 April 2012 Posted 26 April 2012 Show me one that has fallen to the side. ffs that's my point !! they don't fookin fall down at all unless they are brought down by controlled demolition ,
Trav Le Bleu Posted 26 April 2012 Posted 26 April 2012 It's a moron who can't spell. He went shcool here.
BoneDog Posted 26 April 2012 Author Posted 26 April 2012 What's the Doomsday Clock at now then? Seriously you need to be more worried about the socio-economic situation and the possibility of a global spiral of economic depression, which of course could spark off wars here and there. I wouldn't say that World War 3 is impossible, but it certainly wouldn't be an apocalyptic nuclear armageddon. I agree with you that WW3 won't be an apocalyptic nuclear armageddon, although I do think that at least one nuclear weapon will be used somewhere in the Middle East or Asia. The whole thing is about shifting global power from the US to Israel, so there will still be a world to play in after it's all finished. And then, Israel will rule the world for about 20 - 40 years. It will be the shortest world ruler in history and then the golden age will return.* In the second video I posted on page 1 Tarpley briefly touches on the aftermath and what life will be like for Europeans, but he doesn't mention nuclear bombs in our neck of the woods. As for the Doomsday Clock, I won't take much notice of that because I think that something spectacular is going to happen to trigger WW3, so it will be totally out of the blue! The important thing is, that when this spectacular false flag event happens, that we don't blame who the government tells us we should blame. It will be a set up and if we trust them then we will see massive bloodshed in our streets. *They know it, I know it and The Pope knows it , that's why he's set up his super spy telescope down south near antarctica, so they can leg it into their mountain bunkers when they see the ships arriving Sadly, most of us won't be here to enjoy those events. Any of you who are still around in that time, will you shake hands with Jesus for me please and kiss his forehead and say I was one of his biggest fans. The above paragraph is just my interpretation on coming events from studying, so any of you haters who are mad because I have mentioned religion can go ****in spit.......SWIVVEL.
Parafox Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 As for the Doomsday Clock, I won't take much notice of that because I think that something spectacular is going to happen to trigger WW3, so it will be totally out of the blue! The important thing is, that when this spectacular false flag event happens, that we don't blame who the government tells us we should blame. It will be a set up and if we trust them then we will see massive bloodshed in our streets. Eurasia vs Eastasia (or maybe Oceania, if the government tell us so)
Rincewind Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 Re title to 2024? or any date after 2012 preferably after I have long departed from this world.
OzFox Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 Eurasia vs Eastasia (or maybe Oceania, if the government tell us so) Oceania? I recommend starting with the Kiwis.
breadandcheese Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 I agree with you that WW3 won't be an apocalyptic nuclear armageddon, although I do think that at least one nuclear weapon will be used somewhere in the Middle East or Asia. The whole thing is about shifting global power from the US to Israel, so there will still be a world to play in after it's all finished. And then, Israel will rule the world for about 20 - 40 years. It will be the shortest world ruler in history and then the golden age will return. * The above paragraph is just my interpretation on coming events from studying, so any of you haters who are mad because I have mentioned religion can go ****in spit....... SWIVVEL. "The Jew seeks domination not only among the German people but among all peoples." - Julius Streicher (founder of Der Sturmer a anti-semitic Nazi propaganda newspaper). The quote is from a speech he made in Germany in 1924. "And then Israel (the Jewish state) will rule the world" - El Empty, from his quote above. Spot the difference? El Empty, in the past, I've thought you've scraped close to anti-semitism with your comments, but your comment above is not scraping close to the bone, it is firmly anti-semitic and should be called out as such. I'm not even sure why you're anti-semitic as racism in any form is abhorrent.
adam1 Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 The comments made by El Empty are not anti semetic. He is merely attacking zionism. This is a dangerous and racist ideology.
Webbo Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 The comments made by El Empty are not anti semetic. He is merely attacking zionism. This is a dangerous and racist ideology. It is if you say there is a secret Jewish conspiracy that is running the world for the benefit of Israel.
adam1 Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 If this was about a catholic state and the comments made were considerably worse, would you or others be attacking el empty in a way you have just done? No. So why do you jump on the anti semetic bandwagon? Its not like judaism is more important then any other religion. All religions have dangerous ideologies contained within. Christianity, Islam and Judaism. Judaism has zionism. The problem is that zionism has a form of protection which other ideologies do not. The words anti semetic. Any criticism and its labelled as anti semetic.
breadandcheese Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 If this was about a catholic state and the comments made were considerably worse, would you or others be attacking el empty in a way you have just done? No. So why do you jump on the anti semetic bandwagon? Its not like judaism is more important then any other religion. All religions have dangerous ideologies contained within. Christianity, Islam and Judaism. Judaism has zionism. The problem is that zionism has a form of protection which other ideologies do not. The words anti semetic. Any criticism and its labelled as anti semetic. If somebody started talking about global conspiracies involving other faiths, then yes i would question the person posting. Judaism is not more important than Christianity or Islam. However, El Empty's comments cannot be described as anything but anti-semitic. He has spoken about a plan for Israel to conquer and rule the world. He has no evidence at all, just a prejudicial belief that the Jewish country wants to takeover and rule the world. So it's not that the Jews want to takeover the world, it's that the country of the Jews wants to. If somebody claimed there was a secret plot involving Britain looking to re-conquer the empire and enslave the rest of the world, based on nothing more than a couple of made up stories and a prejudicial belief that the British are always involved in shady dealings, that would be racism. There is no difference. Of course it's not wrong to criticise Israel, but the question is how you criticise? If you're criticising Israeli policy, such as settlement building, then yes, that is sensible and not remotely anti-semitic. When you start criticising Israel on the basis that there is a secret plot to conquer the world and form an empire, then yes, that is anti-semitic.
Webbo Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 If this was about a catholic state and the comments made were considerably worse, would you or others be attacking el empty in a way you have just done? No. So why do you jump on the anti semetic bandwagon? Its not like judaism is more important then any other religion. All religions have dangerous ideologies contained within. Christianity, Islam and Judaism. Judaism has zionism. The problem is that zionism has a form of protection which other ideologies do not. The words anti semetic. Any criticism and its labelled as anti semetic. I'm not anti any religion and I have stood up for religion on here many times.
Reynard Bleu Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 I think a continued series of bush-fire type wars, where the indiginous population are the catlyst and much of the resource for war is more likley than a cross-continent conflagration, it suits the major powers this way. As I said before, Israel can change all that with pre-emptive strikes on anything it sees as a threat to its security, nothing would unite the arab/muslim world more than and Israeli first strike on a brother state.
Raw Dykes Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 I agree with you that WW3 won't be an apocalyptic nuclear armageddon, although I do think that at least one nuclear weapon will be used somewhere in the Middle East or Asia. The whole thing is about shifting global power from the US to Israel, so there will still be a world to play in after it's all finished. And then, Israel will rule the world for about 20 - 40 years. It will be the shortest world ruler in history and then the golden age will return.* Why do you think this? Who wants this? Why? How do you think this could possibly happen? What golden age do you mean?
Rincewind Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 Isn't America on Israels side? And if they are Britain will follow suit. They have already put the thought into a lot of peoples minds that Islam is evil. The OT is full of passages that tell the people of Israel to drive enemies away stop them marrying foreigners or kill anyone that follows another religion. I don't want to be around to take a side or get into an argument about sides. I don't want to see any country take on any other country. Never knew what Zionists were before the subject came up in this thread. I may have heard of them but to me there were just another crackpot religious group
adam1 Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 The OT is full of passages that tell the people of Israel to drive enemies away stop them marrying foreigners or kill anyone that follows another religion. That is why I am highly critical of Israel. Yet no-one else realises this. I do hope that Palestine becomes a member of the UN as it would cause a shit storm . USA will in no doubt throw its dummy out of the pram. Oh and the reason why all US administration supports Israel is the same reason its anti Castro. Funding and votes.
Bert Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 Is there video footage of the WT7 collapse from other sides of the building? And why was someone recording the buildings?
adam1 Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 And why was someone recording the buildings? Wrong thread? It is confusing when everyone is posting in TWO 'theory' threads at the same time.
OzFox Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 And why was someone recording the buildings? Because it had been burning for hours and stood next to two big buildings that had already collapsed
Rincewind Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 I think zingari dug out the ancient thread to avoid confusion.
OzFox Posted 27 April 2012 Posted 27 April 2012 I think zingari dug out the ancient thread to avoid confusion. Just need a JFK one now and he'll have the set
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.