Bryn Posted 12 May 2012 Posted 12 May 2012 Was chatting to another team's supporter a bit ago and we were talking about how Pearson is unlikely to splash cash like Sven. It got me onto thinking about what is the most he would spend. I'm under the impression he probably hasn't spent more than a million on a player in his career? As far as I can think, we've got players like Marshall, Morgan, Gallagher, Wellens who all cost about a million. Big Steve was about £1.5m but was before Pearson, and Waghorn and those who followed under the Thais were after Pearson. Am I wrong? Can anyone list, say, Pearson's top 5/10 most expensive transfers? At any of his clubs.
Dan Posted 12 May 2012 Posted 12 May 2012 I personally make it; Wellens, McLean, Fryatt, Morgan, Marshall. In that order.
Bryn Posted 12 May 2012 Author Posted 12 May 2012 I think Levein bought Fryatt. He means when Fryatt went to Hull for about £1.2m. Same fee as Wellens and McLean I make it, must be his ceiling!
ian the fox Posted 12 May 2012 Posted 12 May 2012 sven signings relied upon which agents rang up on the day ,
Bryn Posted 12 May 2012 Author Posted 12 May 2012 I think Pearson would spend £3million + on Chester You see, I don't. I think he'd chance his arm at finding another James Chester, rather than buy the same guy he's already bought once for a bigger fee.
Dan Posted 13 May 2012 Posted 13 May 2012 I thought the same Burnham, swear all three were £1.2mil. Just a thought, isn't that the quoted fee for De Laet too?
Jakemoore Posted 13 May 2012 Posted 13 May 2012 This is the first time he's ever had a lot of money to work with! Watch this space, he'll splash some cash I'm certain!
Tielemans63 Posted 13 May 2012 Posted 13 May 2012 Pretty sure Gally cost us £1.2 million as well didn't he?
FrankieADZ Posted 13 May 2012 Posted 13 May 2012 Pretty sure Gally cost us £1.2 million as well didn't he? thought he cost around the 750K-£1million mark. honestly cant remember....dont think hes spent over £2million on anyone here.
stourbridgefox Posted 13 May 2012 Posted 13 May 2012 Anyone remember when we broke our transfer record by signing Mark Blake for £360 000? This beat our long-standing record of £350 000 for Tommy Wright. My point is, £1 million seems almost like the minimum figure we would pay on a player these days. Fees below this seem like small change. Now I don't think it is progress necessarily in football in general, but it definitely is better supporting a club which spends money rather than one which doesn't. There is a big difference between spending what is needed, being tight-arsed and splashing a wad on anything with two feet. I think Pearson will do the former.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.