Katy Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 Freund went a bit wappy the other night didnt he? I guess thats when he was banned. Is this for good or just a Daniel (before he was totally deleted)/Nathan Ellington/Chandler style banning?
Anish Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 yep he has. 135810[/snapback] If you saw what he sent me via PM you'd realise that his ban is fully justified. The guy was a moron, end of.
Mark Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 Freund went a bit wappy the other night didnt he? I guess thats when he was banned. Is this for good or just a Daniel (before he was totally deleted)/Nathan Ellington/Chandler style banning? 135818[/snapback] Not decided. What he did was very harsh.
Knighton Matt Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 yep he has. 135810[/snapback] If you saw what he sent me via PM you'd realise that his ban is fully justified. The guy was a moron, end of. 135828[/snapback] to be fair I didn't say it wasn't justified as I have no knowledge of the goings on and will not pass comment on them. The crying smilie was my way of expressing my sadness that a big asset to this forum (which I appreciate not everyone will agree with) is now no longer here.
Anish Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 Fair enough Matt, but he broke the forum rules and was completely out of order, so he deserved the consequences.
john_lcfc Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 Freund went a bit wappy the other night didnt he? I guess thats when he was banned. Is this for good or just a Daniel (before he was totally deleted)/Nathan Ellington/Chandler style banning? 135818[/snapback] Not decided. What he did was very harsh. 135834[/snapback] may i ask what he did? or what he said too anish ? only say if you want to on the board
Knighton Matt Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 Fair enough Matt, but he broke the forum rules and was completely out of order, so he deserved the consequences. 135839[/snapback] So I hear and I completely agree Anish there is no need for unprovoked, personal attacks. My involvement in this thread was not a defence of his actions but an expression of sadness that freund went too far and now is not part of the forum anymore.
Katy Posted 10 July 2005 Posted 10 July 2005 Oh dear, It was always difficult to work out whether he was joking or not. I guess this time he wasnt
Matt Posted 11 July 2005 Posted 11 July 2005 WOOHOO! Freund! And on the subject of Daniel he had his ban took of so he could use the boards again and then pissed off an doesn't use the boards anymore anyway, so what was the point in him trying so hard to want to come back on to these boards?!?
Katy Posted 11 July 2005 Posted 11 July 2005 WOOHOO! Freund!And on the subject of Daniel he had his ban took of so he could use the boards again and then pissed off an doesn't use the boards anymore anyway, so what was the point in him trying so hard to want to come back on to these boards?!? 136256[/snapback] Theres more to it than that I believe and also its because hes an attention seeker
Guest Posted 11 July 2005 Posted 11 July 2005 also its because hes an attention seeker 136262[/snapback] You jest, surely!!
Hitesh Posted 11 July 2005 Posted 11 July 2005 i wondered where he had disappeared to 135967[/snapback] Same, i just thought he was on holiday or something. Although i did find it strange when he came on under some wierd name.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.