Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
rico

The Beatles

By rico, in Music and Gaming

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

May be an image of text

 

I can't vouch for it's accuracy, does it include every streaming option for a start.

  • Like 2
Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Dr Marco said:

nice to see twist & shout in the top 10

lennon's raucous vocals are class

John's voice was outstanding. Twist & Shout and there's a solo in This Boy which is also one of my favourites.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, davieG said:

608961708_1334823752016755_5789049427946

I always find their schedule amazing but not in a good way. No wonder they quit it all to stay in the studio!

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

May be an image of musical instrument

Magical Media Tour  ·

Follow
 
🍏 In February 1967, Paul McCartney read a small article in the Daily Mail about a 17-year-old girl who had run away from home.
That article became “She’s Leaving Home!"
Paul was struck by a quote from her father: “I can’t imagine why she should run away. She has everything here.”
But what happened next in the studio is just as interesting.
Paul asked George Martin to arrange the strings.
Martin couldn’t do it that day.
So Paul hired Mike Leander instead.
George Martin was deeply hurt.
He still conducted the session… but he didn’t orchestrate it.
And here’s something most people don’t realize...
None of The Beatles played instruments on this track!
Only: • Four violins
• Two violas
• Two cellos
• Double bass
• Harp
Paul sang lead. John sang the answering lines.
When Paul later played the finished song for Brian Wilson, he and his wife both cried.
All of that came from one short newspaper article!
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

https://bloggingplatform.org/terror-turned-into-lifelong-belief-the-moment-paul-mccartneys-first-words-quietly-shaped-mary-hopkins-future/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQH62RleHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeY-d19ucCYPL0rw-ACVINDbXi4vrbLeQxEun-bAiLxw_bGRUP_KmF2HKh8uI_aem_qtmWkcGt4UeVuRKIgmWwCQ

 

TERROR TURNED INTO LIFELONG BELIEF — The Moment Paul McCartney’s First Words Quietly Shaped Mary Hopkin’s Future

byJasmin

February 20, 2026

 

Fear arrived before confidence ever had a chance. In August 1968, inside the offices of Apple Records, Mary Hopkinwaited, certain she did not belong.

She was eighteen years old, newly discovered, carrying a voice that felt fragile in her own ears. Around her were names already etched into history. They were The Beatles. She was still deciding whether she deserved to be there at all.

The room felt larger than it was. Every sound seemed amplified by doubt. Mary later recalled feeling small, overwhelmed by the weight of reputation and expectation. Talent alone did not quiet that fear. At that age, belief from others mattered more than belief in oneself.

Then Paul McCartney walked in.

There was no dramatic entrance. No distance created by status. He smiled easily, spoke warmly, and closed the invisible gap she had built in her mind. He listened, not like a producer searching for a sound, but like a person meeting another person. The atmosphere shifted almost immediately.

 “You’re wonderful. I want to work with you.”

The sentence was simple. It carried no conditions, no warning, no test attached. Yet it rewrote everything. Fear did not argue. It dissolved. In its place, something steadier took hold. Paul did not only hear a voice worth recording. He saw a future worth trusting. Confidence entered the room quietly, without announcement, and stayed.

In the days that followed, the song Those Were the Days was recorded. Its melody felt timeless even then, carried by innocence rather than ambition. When it reached the public, the response was immediate. It rose to number one. Fame arrived swiftly, bright and overwhelming, just as it often does.

And then, as fame tends to do, it softened.

Charts changed. Attention moved elsewhere. But something far more durable remained. Mary’s sense of worth no longer depended on success or applause. It rested on a moment when someone she respected spoke belief into her life without hesitation.

Years later, Mary Hopkin would reflect that success came and went, as all careers do. What never faded was the value Paul McCartney gave her in that first meeting. It became a quiet foundation beneath every step she took afterward.

This story endures not because it produced a hit record, but because it revealed something essential about greatness. True influence does not always announce itself through sound or spectacle. Sometimes it appears in a single sentence, spoken at the right moment, to the right person, by someone willing to see potential before it proves itself.

In that Apple Records office, history did not begin with a song. It began with belief. And for Mary Hopkin, that belief lasted longer than any number-one record ever could.

Video

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

May be an image of saxophone and guitar

Fifteen year old Paul McCartney and seventeen year old John Lennon were captured together on camera for the very first time in a photograph that would later become historic. For years, many believed the image had been taken at Liverpool’s New Clubmoor Hall in Norris Green. In truth, the moment was preserved at Wilson Hall in Garston, quietly marking the beginning of a partnership that would change music forever.
Also standing in the frame were Colin Hanton on drums, Len Garry playing tea chest bass, and guitarist Eric Griffiths. They were still just teenagers, filled with raw energy and ambition, unaware that the small local performances they were giving would one day echo across the world. The photograph freezes them in that fragile, hopeful stage before fame, when everything still felt possible.
Because Len Garry stopped playing with The Quarrymen in late October 1957, Leslie Kearney’s photograph was most likely taken earlier that month or perhaps in September. It captured not legends, but boys on the edge of something extraordinary. In that simple image lies the quiet birth of a story that would reshape modern music and bind Paul and John together in history.
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Fox92

Fox92

Posted
Posted
On 03/03/2026 at 13:42, Dr Marco said:

Great stuff!

 

646098463_3334574096699145_6150584087756

 

 

Not watched it yet but Mull Of Kintyre is one of my favourites. 

 

What a career he has had. Two great bands and a good solo career.

 

I don't think he will ever be matched, McCartney, we will probably look back on him years later to appreciate how good he actually is.

  • Thanks 1
  • 2 weeks later...
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
 
As a dedicated Beatles fan, delving into the peak years of Beatlemania always unearths fascinating intersections between rock and roll and classic Hollywood glamour. One of the most intriguing, yet often overlooked, footnotes in the band’s history is the brief flurry of rumors surrounding Ringo Starr and the iconic 1960s sex symbol, Ann-Margret. To understand the gravity of this rumor, one must first recognize the sheer magnitude of Ringo’s popularity in the United States. While John and Paul were the primary songwriters, 1964 America was fully in the grip of "Ringo-mania." He received the most fan mail, and his unassuming, sad-eyed charm made him incredibly magnetic.
During this era, Ann-Margret was the undisputed "It Girl" of Hollywood. Fresh off her electrifying performance opposite Elvis Presley in Viva Las Vegas, she was a captivating blend of immense talent and breathtaking beauty. When The Beatles conquered America and began brushing shoulders with Hollywood’s elite, the press was desperate to link the biggest rock stars in the world with the silver screen's most desirable women. Rumors began to circulate that Ringo and Ann-Margret had caught each other's eye, sparking whispers of a secret date and a fleeting, flirtatious romance.
For us fans, this rumor is less about scandalous gossip and more about what it represented. It highlighted Ringo’s often-underestimated appeal. He was not just the quirky drummer in the back; he possessed a genuine, understated charisma that could reportedly capture the attention of a woman who had the biggest stars in the world knocking at her door. While neither party ever confirmed a deeply serious relationship—often laughing it off as media exaggeration or a brief, friendly encounter—the visual of the working-class lad from the Dingle charming Hollywood’s ultimate golden girl remains a brilliant snapshot of the 1960s. It represents a brief, magical moment when the British Invasion and classical Hollywood royalty collided, leaving fans forever curious about what really happened behind closed doors.
 
May be an image of one or more people
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
In February 2026, the new documentary from Beatles author and historian, Mark Lewisohn, called Evolver 62 was released.
As someone who studies The Beatles' history, this was an intriguing movie to watch. I remember seeing these lectures advertised in the past in the UK, and wished he would bring them to the US.
Of course, Mark is the renowned Beatles historian and author who has written a number of Beatles' books. The most well-known is his 2013 book, Tune In: The Beatles: All These Years, Volume 1, which covered in great detail the history of The Fab Four from birth through 1962.
Evolver 62 (the title is a clever play on words of the Revolver album suggesting the evolution of the Beatles in 1962) is a 108-minute university-style lecture interspersed with Lewisohn visiting famous Beatles locations, or showcasing the rarest of rare Beatles memorabilia (which he happens to own).
Continue reading Daytrippin's review of Evolver 62 on our new Patreon page (it's free to read) (link in comment below)
SpacedX

SpacedX

Posted
Posted
On 12/02/2026 at 19:52, davieG said:

 

And here’s something most people don’t realize...
None of The Beatles played instruments on this track!
 

Strange comment given that most with even a passing interest in the Beatles would be aware of this. The previous year, none of them played instruments on Eleanor Rigby either. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...