Get a grip.

[sylofox]

Funny how there's so many posters on here who appear to hate the board, slag off the mods, think the other posters are clueless arseholes and that they're the only ones who can see 'the truth'...

 

...Begs the question, why the **** do they stick around if they hate it so much?! Never seen such a bunch of pathetic, moaning martyrs in my whole life. There are plenty of other Leicester City forums chaps, if you don't like it here then you know what to do. Mayeb you could even start up your own forum, at your own expense, and dedicate your own time to moderating it? Oh, too much effort? Thought so. Better just stay here and slag everyone off instead.

I don't hate the board and for the most part enjoy it.

Also I have not slagged of the mods.

However I have made points  about issue's that do annoy me (removing post's thread's for no reason)

Why was the thread about odds on our nxt manager removed.

It was hurting no one and was being used cos people had an intrest in it and were posting in it.

 

Surely the board is here to talk about all things City and is not the bookies having odds for our nxt manager a City issue.

 

Or we could just have threads on the club not selling Balti pies any more.

[Dan]

Funny how there's so many posters on here who appear to hate the board, slag off the mods, think the other posters are clueless arseholes and that they're the only ones who can see 'the truth'...

 

...Begs the question, why the **** do they stick around if they hate it so much?! Never seen such a bunch of pathetic, moaning martyrs in my whole life. There are plenty of other Leicester City forums chaps, if you don't like it here then you know what to do. Mayeb you could even start up your own forum, at your own expense, and dedicate your own time to moderating it? Oh, too much effort? Thought so. Better just stay here and slag everyone off instead.

 

Banning someone for disagreeing with the majority opinion is absolutely ridiculous if that's what's actually happened in the past, and that's regardless of the debate. Completely defeats the object of having a forum in the first place.

[sylofox]

Banning someone for disagreeing with the majority opinion is absolutely ridiculous if that's what's actually happened in the past, and that's regardless of the debate. Completely defeats the object of having a forum in the first place.

As is deletting posts/Threads because you don't agree/like them.

 

If they are abusive or a legal implication fair enough.

[indierich06]

Banning someone for disagreeing with the majority opinion is absolutely ridiculous if that's what's actually happened in the past, and that's regardless of the debate. Completely defeats the object of having a forum in the first place.

 

Yeah. If that's what actually happened.

[Stadt]

I can't help but feel the people who get banned don't tell the full tale sometimes.

[Mark_w]

Banning someone for disagreeing with the majority opinion is absolutely ridiculous if that's what's actually happened in the past, and that's regardless of the debate. Completely defeats the object of having a forum in the first place.

 

Well the person who runs the board blatantly disagrees with the majority opinion surrounding Nigel Pearson. Which is basically the main talking point on this forum.

 

So I doubt that happens that often.

[Guest Col city fan]

As is deletting posts/Threads because you don't agree/like them.

If they are abusive or a legal implication fair enough.

Good job I aint a mod cos I'd delete ALL your posts.

[dynamark]

My issue is that Np doesn't seem to be too bothered in interviews.I would prefer him to be along the lines of 'we should have battered these'.

Not a bad position but if we cannot put teams away it could be shades of last year

[sylofox]

Good job I aint a mod cos I'd delete ALL your posts.

I'd just Delete you :xmastongue:    :xmastongue: