CosbehFox

The Trust actually have a chap who's consulted within the FSA regards VAR. They don't shout about it enough and the bloke who does that role is very decent and I am sure would push for the best outcome. Think Whelan is too harshly judged on here. There's certainly more humility to hear than a number of others elsewhere at the club.

Race across the world went up a notch this week. Going to be good viewing this Indonesia section

Thetford lost the semi-final last night. Tbf having heard what the suspended player did - I am happy to side with Daggers point of view.

Points totals badly skewed this season as the division is utter dog muck at the bottom

We defended deeper than our norm for certain

You can get away with him in a deep block scenario v Bournemouth but you’ll consistently get teams put the ball in the channels on transition and expose his lack of pace there as Chelsea did. I don’t think you need to be a particularly great team to do that either. We were street smart v Bournemouth but silly collectively v Chelsea Id say no - the telegraph article worries me slightly but equally it might be realistically where we are financially

Potter & Enzo - same agency/agent

It sounds like you suffer from similar symptoms to me which often manifest in a migraine. I am a big 'sweater'. Running 5K on the average day makes it look like I have running it in the Amazon. Similar salt deposits on my skin. Now I combat that with fluids whilst running - I am trying to introduce a bit of food on the longer stuff. Straight after - I have a bottle of water with salt in it or a lucozade sport - I try to get sugar and salt in the system. Cheap ice lollies work well too. I have got more resistant now as my performance and endurance has increased substantially.

Some superb achievements in here lately.

I don’t think they will do it but they do have probably the richest owners in Serie A. 58th richest person in the world connected with Tabacco

Man City’s case is because of a complete different set of rules within FFP. There’s no ability to be consistent if it’s for breaking different rules.

What does that have to do Leicester City’s failure to keep up with FFP sustainability rules?

No. I’m looking it from the prism of a minor knowledge in certain areas of law. Man City’s charges are incredibly complex. Largely through confidential information rather than public accounts. Some of it relates to off the book payments through third party companies, some of it relates to the illegal signing of under 16s. Effectively stuff that borders actual theft and therefore the PL need to get their evidence absolutely spot on. In case of Everton and Nottingham Forest, they had provisional copies of their accounts as early as December 2023 and therefore they have the evidence to charge quite quickly. The rule breaking is pretty damn clear hence both clubs admitted error (quickens things up) and the contention was the degree of punishment. It’s like trying to compare a case of a mafioso network which involves murder to a single case of murder.

He has done a while - his Missus was on the Jungle with the hair transplant whopper

So how we getting the Manchester City situation out in the open? Are Leicester City privy to this information? The reason other points deducted clubs haven’t kicked off is because the cases of Man City and FFP failure are vastly different.

In what forum can you threaten to make a nuisance of yourself ? PL just call your bluff and let you run off to the media. Smaller clubs don’t give a **** cos you are their rivals and you’ve cheated. Bigger clubs brush it offish They are held in the same format as legal cases in case they have to escalate. Bit like adjudication or employment hearings. Hence why we have KC’s involved. You can’t have your own case heard and start waffling on about another case. Using other examples can’t be used as a defence. It would be like a murderer saying ‘yeah but don’t go too harsh on me because you haven’t punished the serial killer yet.’ You can only use precedent as a way of debating punishment

Also Nick De Marco isn’t going to undermine his biggest client (by some distance - to the point he’s regularly in Dubai)

In which case then you can’t use a non concluded legal case as a precedent. Currently as it stands it’s only alleged Man City denied us CL money rather than proved. Their case isn’t defined by public information such as accounts/FFP cals.

Luton would have been nowhere in a traditional season. Haven’t claimed 30 points

Man City’s lack of punishment in that season has nothing to do with the Premier League. It was an UEFA charge which was appealed successfully via CAS. So it can’t form any part of a defence. Also the person representing us also has represented or is representing Man City, Forest, Newcastle. So don’t expect any criticism thrown towards his clients.

Couldn’t think of anywhere more ill suiting to his family than moving to Como. It’s gotta be US or UAE/Saudi you’d think

I hope they have more brains than money. The 100 is an attempt at recreating IPL and it just don’t work. ECB from the very beginning of the 100 thought they could apply something which worked elsewhere to the UK cricketing ‘aware’ public.

Interested to see the PFA team of the year.

Contract Has an option to further extend by a year supposedly.

With the new EFL TV scheduling Bromley might be easier than previously to tie in with a LCFC visit in London