Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

MGLCFC

Member
  • Posts

    3,748
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MGLCFC

  1. Is he injured. Got to allow Haaland if everyone else is available.
  2. And a dilly ding, dilly Dong
  3. Come on, Hamza has had more than one major issue whilst at LCFC. Liking contentious Palestinian Tweets, drunk driving, alleged tweets after Sheff U game. The COVID thing is hardly clutching at straws. Society were having to follow strict rules and because he's a well paid 'footballer' he thinks he can do as he pleases and rules don't apply to him. I honestly wanted to club to sack him, along with others, who broke the rules. Losing loved ones is a high price to pay and when footballers simply flout the rules because they can't restrain themselves like most others had to, it's a complete lack of thought and a 'couldn't care less' attitude.
  4. Probably worse - when everyone had to follow COVID rules, he decided to go out and party. That's sticking 2 fingers up at the club and supporters.
  5. Can't have dual standards though - I agree poor behaviour shouldn't be tolerated, so if that's the case why is Hamza still here?
  6. Two key elements of his success, along with KDH and Ndidi. Not sure Ricci P is the player he was two years ago and can't play 2 games a week (it looks like Choudhury is out for a while), who would partner Vestergaard now Faes has gone (perhaps Okoli) and unless Mavadidi finds some form that has been seriously lacking, half the team is missing from 2 years ago.
  7. Nay for a couple of reasons 1) He hasn't the time to make these players play his style effectively, particularly as we have no keeper who can play out from the back like Mads did. 2) There isn't the quality in the squad to play his style effectively Also I can't see him risking his reputation, which at present is quite high, coming to Leicester with the real possibility of relegation.
  8. Magic - Bring Holloway back and get us relegated. Reinstate Pearson for back to back promotions Sack Pearson after Thai trip scandal Reinstate Ranieri - win the league again. Simple
  9. Certainly hope so, but I remember hearing the same thing being said about Coady when we were chasing him.
  10. Yes shocking - but he was available for selection according to King.
  11. Yes, I do, but neither you or I know the details behind the problem. On the surface Winks' behaviour is totally unacceptable. This alleged behaviour happened whilst King was part of the management team. So for King to bring him back, maybe he feels the issue was more the previous managers rather than Winks. Saying Winks is a cancer is just an opinion, and for the record I tend to agree with you, but how many players have come out and said so. All I'm saying, is based on what I saw today, he improved the performance when he came on. Yes we conceded 2 goals (neither his fault) but we looked more threatening and had Ayew converted the penalty, I think we may have got something from the game.
  12. Just because someone has a different opinion to you they are happy clappers. This comment is typical of some on here. I'm not a HAPPY CLAPPER as you suggest. I think the club has been run into the ground by Top and Rudkin. I don't clap at the end of games. I've been vocal both home and away at how poorly our club has been run, but because I suggest Winks is one of our better midfielders and I will support the new managers decision to play him, it makes me a happy clapper. Absolutely pathetic.
  13. But he's much better than what we have available at present, isn't he?
  14. Look in the mirror, clown
  15. Poor argument - look at our XG once he was introduced - much more likely to score. He can hardly be blamed for the 2 goals conceded.
  16. You're missing the point. If the current manager feels he warrants a place in the match day squad, then I'm prepared to back his decision, as he, rather than you or me, have a greater insight into the internal issues surrounding the problem. Winks was good today, I can understand people feel he's let himself, the club and supporters down, but the crisis we are in, in particular in midfield, he is a better option than the others.
  17. Your entitled to your opinion, but if the manager wishes him to be part of the match day squad, then I'll support King's decision. You must be blind if you can't see we were significantly better when Winks on the field today. We actually looked like we might score.
  18. But could help still be in this division - he's better than what's available at present.
  19. So you know the exact reason behind the issues. If Kingy thinks he should be selected, surely we should get behind the interim manager?
  20. Even though we were better once he was introduced. With him playing we have a chance of survival. I take it you want us in this league.
  21. Everyone can have their opinions on what is right or wrong in regards Winks' situation, but for me we looked better today once he was introduced. Apart from James, he is our best midfielder IMO.
  22. Yet we were far better in an attacking sense when he was on the pitch.
  23. Did well, but not a centre back (lost too many aerial duals). Hope he gets a run of games at right back. Like how he gained confidence after his first run forward which drew a foul and a booking for Dykes.
  24. Disappointed he took a midfielder off instead of Mavadidi who did jack all game.
  25. Perhaps you're correct regarding his selection - but if if he were I'd take it you'd not be supportive of King's decision. Would you voice your anger by booing him? I'm not being judgemental as everyone has differing opinions, I'm just curious.
×
×
  • Create New...